This question already exists:
RISCV64 suport for KONG [closed]
Closed 2 months ago.
Does RISCV64 support KONG [API gateway] ? Does RISCV64 support luaJIT and openresty [dependencies of KONG] ?
I am using EdgeX with security on RISCV architecture and for that I need to use KONG as an API gateway. please let me know if riscv64 support kong or do we have any alternative for that.
Related
Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 2 years ago.
Improve this question
I am beginner to learning ML and DL. I already have faced some problems in windows operating system that's why I want moved on Linux operating system but I am confused which one is better to learn ML and DL.
Which problems I have faced in windows OS,
I can't install tensorflow with keras
After trying about 5 or more days when I failed to Install tensorflow and keras in anaconda
Although finally I successed to install tensorflow and kears to create the new environment in anaconda navigator but some of packages are installed step by step
Related to point-3: Again I had faced problems for specific packages
Then I decided to use google colab
In google colab, It takes more time to load the datasets and for every entre time I should load datasets, it takes more time
And for these above reason and some more , I further have decided to Linux OS. But I am confused about Ubuntu and Kali. I have listen that Kali is better for Hacking and Ubuntu is for Development.
My laptop details are below,
8 GB RAM
1TB hard disk
7th Gen
Core i5
Kali is a distro designed specifically for penetration testing. It's not very safe out of the box compare to other mainstream Linux distro. Kali also comes bundled with lots of tools that are not suitable for your use. It is recommended that you go with Ubuntu for your purpose.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 4 years ago.
Improve this question
I need to create a reliable and accurate synchronization between two CentOS 6 machines connected through a direct Ethernet connection.
I've seen that on Linux several implementation of the IEEE 1588 Precision Time Protocol (PTP) exist:
PTPd:
Apparently, this is the original implentation
Source code available on GitHub (appparently, still maintained almost unmaintained)
PTPd2:
A new version meant to supersede the previous implementation
Apparently unmaintained
For CentOS 6, available only in the EPEL repositories
PTPv2d:
A further implementation
Unmaintained as well
linuxptp:
A specific implementation for Linux
Maintained
Available on the CentOS repositories
Suggested by the RedHat documentation for both RedHat 6 and RedHat 7
My questions follow:
Why does the RedHat documentation suggest the use of linuxptp for RedHat 6 (based on Linux kernel 2.6) despite the linuxptp documentation says that a Linux kernel version 3.0 or newer is needed ?
Which are differences between PTPd2 and Linuxptp in terms of reliability and timing accuracy ?
Which one should I prefer on CentOS 6 and on CentOS 7, respectively ?
Why either PTPd2 and Linuxptp do not synchronize immediately and often need me to start/stop the service several times or manually change system time through date to make the machine synchronize ?
Linuxptp works on RH6 thanks to RedHat backporting PTP support, as explained here. Indeed, it is the only choice, as the other packages have not been maintained.
Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
Would it be any less secure to use Grails 2.4.4 instead of the latest version? (2.4.4 is the latest version I can currently download with Brew). GGTS for eclipse doesn't (currently) support Grails 3 so I'm wondering if I need to buy Intellij to develop a secure app.
I can't see why it would be less secure but I figured I should ask to make sure.
Your application is more likely to be the source of vulnerability than the platform you're using.
That being said, using outdated versions of a platform is asking for trouble. Unless 2.4.4 is actively being developed and supported, it is potentially less secure than new versions.
Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow.
Closed 10 years ago.
Improve this question
Know anybody, how i can install NodeJS on dd-wrt, openwrt or freewrt system?
Or Maybe on any Router with one on these systems: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_router_or_firewall_distributions
I stumbled across one fellow on Twitter who claimed to have done so back in 2011 April and offered a high-level overview of the process. My research indicates that this will only be possible on little-endian chipsets (e.g. "mipsel", as on the ASUS RT-N16) as even the MIPS version of v8 does not support big-endian implementations of that architecture (e.g. as the Atheros chipset on the Buffalo WZR-HP-AG300H is using).
Sorry, couldn't find any references that indicate it's been done. I suggest checking out the dependencies for Node.
You will need at least the following:
gcc4-g++
git
make
pkg-config
zlib-devel
openssl-devel
openssl
python
Note, that is from the older Cygwin compile instructions so they might not be exactly right.
If you can find all of those for your router OS then it should be possible. Just note that it will take a LONG time to compile.
You may also struggle with memory as most routers are severely lacking. This question on Google has a bit of information.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about programming within the scope defined in the help center.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
Can I access the content of a DocuShare repository using the CMIS protocol?
CMIS is a recently-released standard to access ECM repositories. It is already usable with Alfresco and Nuxeo, and many other ECM vendors are implementing it, but I can't find any information for DocuShare.
Thanks!
Apparently yes, Xerox DocuShare (at least 6.6.1) supports CMIS.
Reference: I have found this presentation file written by Xerox which contains this graph:
After talking with a DocuShare expert, it appears that Xerox Mobile Client for DocuShare is a CMIS client, so Mobile Client Connecter seems to be a DocuShare-to-CMIS gateway.
The CMIS URL has a pattern like this http://yourserver/<something>/ds_mobile_connector/atom, with notably the 2 following patterns seen in the wild:
http://yourserver/docushare/ds_mobile_connector/atom
http://yourserver/documents/ds_mobile_connector/atom
Apparently, the CMIS features:
does not exist in all versions of DocuShare (meaning not on old versions I guess),
is off by default and has to be enabled manually.