I'm trying to lock an entry widget in tool mode like this:
tool
extends Node
export(bool) var locked=false
export(String) var entry="" setget set_entry
func set_entry(new_val):
if!(locked):
entry=new_val
In theory, this should prevent any changes made to the entry widget
as It would rapidly change back to the previous value hence giving the illusion of being disabled
but in reality, you can type freely and after you select another node and then reselect the original node then the value returns to what it was before locking
How do I disable it completely? (perhaps using _set()?)
Edit
This is the problem I'm facing
To disable it completely, I think you need an Inspector Plugin (I talked a little about creating one elsewhere). You could make one that handles the property you are interested in and displays its value, but does not allow to edit it, or only allows to edit it conditionally.
However, for a quick and dirty approach you can do is tell the inspector that the properties changed:
func set_entry(new_val):
if!(locked):
entry=new_val
property_list_changed_notify()
This will cause the inspector to re-read the values of the properties. It can be a bit annoying, depending on the case. By the way, it seems to be ignored in sub-resources, which I find frustrating.
By the way, Godot 4 has PROPERTY_USAGE_READ_ONLY.
Addendum: We can be a little more aggressive than property_list_changed_notify, by using EditorInterface.inspect_object (we can get an instance of EditorInterface from an instance of EditorPlugin). Godot would reload the inspector (which also results in losing the keyboard focus).
Related
I come from Unity, and there you can use ContextMenu method attribute. It will add a button in the editor you can click and the method in your script will be invoked.
This is very helpful for testing/debugging purposes. When you are testing a functionality and you want an easy way to trigger it.
Is there something similar in Godot, or any workaround I can use?
(Godot 3.5 here)
There are multiple ways to run code in the editor.
In fact, Godot games and the Godot editor are built on the same core. One way to say is that Godot is build on Godot… But a more accurate way to say it is that your games are Godot without the editor, plus whatever you built on top.
As a consequence, you have a lot of freedom when extending the Godot editor.
For starters you will be making a tool script. To do that you the tool keyword on the top of the script file. This allows the script to run in the editor.
Warning: Remember that in Godot the Game is not running inside the Editor. Anything that your script moves while running in the Editor would be a modification to the project, for good or ill. And it does not come with build-in undo functionality. It is possible to add undo functionality (with the UndoRedo class), but that is also something you would have to program.
By the way, you might want to know if your code is running on the editor or not. For that, you can check Engine.editor_hint which will be true in the editor.
Read more on the article Running code in the editor.
Since the tool script modify the project. What I present below is more often used to setup parts of the scene or to automate parts of the development workflow. Not for testing features. However since the linked documentation about ContextMenu mentions that it is useful for…
automatically setting up Scene data from the script
I believe what present below is not out of place.
With that said, some modifications of the editor are harder than others. I believe you don't really want to go into the trouble of adding a button to the editor (which is perfectly possible) or an option to the menus (which is also possible, but not everywhere, at least not easily). Instead, I'll stay with the easy options for this answer:
You can make an EditorScript. That is a script that extends the EditorScript class and overrides the _run method. For example:
tool
extends EditorScript
func _run():
print("Hello from the Godot Editor!")
To execute it, have it open in the Script Editor, and to the File menu, and select Run. You can also use secondary click on the script on the "Scripts Panel (on the left of the Script Editor) and select Run in the contextual menu.
The drawback is that is script does not work in the game. It is only for the editor.
Although Godot 3.x does not have official (there is a plugin) support for inspector actions (it might land in Godot 4), we can workaround that. What we will do is export a bool property, and handle (with a setter, which we specify with setget) what happens when you set it. Like this:
tool
extends Node # or whatever
export var do_something:bool setget on_do_something
func on_do_something(_mod_value:bool) -> void:
# do whatever you want
pass
The property should show up as a checkbox in the Inspector panel when the node is selected. And clicking the checkbox will trigger the setter method on_do_something… Which will do whatever you want it to do. Notice also that I'm discarding the value that Godot is trying to set to the property (_mod_value) so it will remain false.
This pattern has got popularity among Godot developers.
If you want to add elements to the Godot UI you would have to make an EditorPlugin (see the Editor Plugins section in the documentation).
Alright but, since the tool script could cause modifications to the project, which might be a problem for testing… What do we do for testing?
Well, I will remind you that you can tell Godot to execute specific scenes (it does not have to run the main scene), and that can another way to test your code.
Furthermore, when your game is running you can go to the Scene panel and select the Remote tab to see the Nodes that exist in the game. Which will allow you to select them, which shows their properties in the Inspector, which would be able to modify (having an effect in real time on the executing game).
… And thus something similar to what I described above about using a setter would work. Except it does not need the tool keyword since it won't be running in the editor:
# No tool
extends Node # or whatever
export var do_something:bool setget on_do_something
func on_do_something(_mod_value:bool) -> void:
# do whatever you want
pass
By the way, in the inspector, when the game is executing and you have the relevant Node selected, you will see your property twice. The first one will trigger the setter, while the second one bypasses it. So pay attention which one you are using.
You might also be interested in the "Project Camera Override" feature, which allows you to freely move the game camera from the editor. You access the feature via the top bar in the editor.
You will also find that it is possible to modify Resources in the editor and see the effect in real time while the game is running. And a Script is a Resource… However pause the game from the Debugger panel (or use a breakpoint) and make sure the script you want to modify is not being executed before you modify it.
Some context
I've recently switched to ubuntu budgie (from unity), and I am really tired of the Plank/panel menu combo. I cannot find a setting that suits me, because depending on my screen setup, there's always something in the wrong place.
I am literally unable to show the menu on certain edges if I activate auto-hide, and if I don't activate it, it's not nice at all, to the point that I have removed the plank thing altogether. (Am I having strange bugs on this OS, or is it really messy?)
My idea
With great frustrations come new ideas. I thought again about one I had in the past. I would like to have a circle menu that pops around my mouse cursor when I press a given key combination (very much the kind of thing you would find in some games).
The main use case is to get "pined" application shortcuts easily when I need them, but perhaps other things would fit well with them (commands ...).
Questions
So my questions are:
Does such a thing already exist?
If it doesn't, is it difficult to realize? (How much time, complexity, ...)
What tools/libraries are needed for such a project? I know I'll find plenty of explanations on the gnome developer website but I could really use some more help.
Since you mention a buggy behaviour on Plank, depending on the screen configuration, I suspect you are suffering from this bug. In short: Plank's returned values for the space it needs are not always correct in multi monitor setup.
A neat option to replace at least part of the functionality is Ulauncher, by default called from a shortcut, but you could trigger it from anything that is capable of running its command.
Since Ulauncher's window simply identifies in the window list, you can easily write a script to move it to the current mouse position.
In case you'd need any help in that, just leave a comment.
Not sure if you are also referring to quick access of the window list, but for that you could use the Window Previews applet, or even the Workspace Overview applet, so life without Plank is possible.
Let me say at outset that I'm using old technology by today's standards! This happens in MFC on Visual Studio 2005 and running under WinXP. (If it 'aint broke.... ;-) )
I have a dialog based app which has a CTabCtrl with two tabs. Each contains a CListCtrl. These work perfectly under normal circumstances. They populate correctly and show and hide as they should. When I first open the application the display selection is correct. If I then minimize the dialog and restore, the CList Ctrl does not show, the tab is blank. It is the only control which has this problem. Another CListCtrl outside of the CTabCtrl does show up correctly. If I then swap tabs and back again, the other tab shows up then the first appears as normal.
This does not happen if I access any other part of the dialog before minimising, it is only when minimising is the absolute first action I take. It also happens with the CListCtrl I have in the other tab if I set this tab to be selected on startup in OnInitDialog where I set up the CTabCtrl.
I have actually solved the effect of this problem by adding into my OnSysCommand(...) the following:
if ((nID & 0xFFF0) == SC_RESTORE)
{
m_ctrlReadList.Invalidate();
}
but it bugs me that I'm adding code to solve a problem which only happens in such odd circumstances. I can't help thinking that there is something I have missed in the setup which is leading to this behaviour. Can anyone offer any explanation as to what is causing it in the first place?
My explanation is based on the facts of what I have found but this has been a learning experience for me so apologies if I get some of it a little confused, I'm still letting it settle in my mind.
Along with this problem I found another which turned out to be relevant. From the nature of the program I'm writing, my CListCtrls needed fixed width headers. Now that turned out to be another thing I couldn't set up! I just needed to prevent the user from grabbing and resizing the header's dividers or double clicking them to autosize, and of course there is functionality in the CListCtrl based on its child CHeaderCtrl to set this up isn't there? Well apparently not. LVS_EX_HEADERDRAGDROP for example isn't the way.
So I explored trying to capture messages which would allow me to myself, and what do you know, I couldn't! I could trap a few but not the ones I needed. I was looking for HDN_BEGINTRACK and HDN_DIVIDERDBLCLICK. (We won't go into the fact that you HAVE TO deal with both A and W versions of those separately!) The CHeaderCtrl is a child of the CListCtrl but it sends its messages back to the CDialog as the CListCtrl's parent. I tried there using both my list's and 0 as ID which headers apparently use. Many of them just plain didn't appear there at all.
So I created my own CListCtrl class inheriting from CListCtrl, overrode OnNotify and they turned up there. I simply prevented CListCtrl::On Notify from being called for those messages and it worked, no resize functionality at all.
I also played with the Z-order too which could have been relevant. I didn't explain earlier but this and another list are on two tabs, exactly aligned over each other. Selecting the tabs HIDEs and SHOWs each of the lists in turn. The other list had no display problems even when I changed the default display in OnInitDialog to show it at start up.
It was under the problematic one. So changing the Z-order in OnInitDialog where I set them up - did nothing! And to rub it in that second list was also unresizeable by default just as I wanted and I couldn't find out why. Their Properties listed exactly the same and there was nowhere in the code where any different aspect was set manually for either, they were effectively theoretically identical, but practically not so. So frustrating!!!
And the upshot of it is that now that the header resize issue is solved my display problem has vanished too! It looks to me and to a few others out there too who report similar symptoms as myself as though the CListCtrl is another one of the slightly flaky ones and needs a little massaging to get the best out of it.
I hope that makes sense to those of you out there who know this control well. I was surprised how simple the solution was, but it also surprised me that the diagnostic process was so difficult. It may of course come down to the ageing system I work within. Nowadays I do this only for fun and the expense of updating VS from 2005 for occasional use is not a high priority. I am sure that some of the symptoms will not show under other build and run environments but it may be worth having the issue and my solution on record somewhere for Google to find for others.
Do anyone know why FocusOut event is not working on linux?
I have 1 enabled textbox and 3 disabled combobox.
I bind the textbox with FocusOut event where it will call a proc that enables or disables the 3 combobox.
It works perfectly on Windows. However, it doesn't seem to trigger the FocusOut event when this action is done on Linux. One weird thing is that if I click on buttons, FocusOut event seems to be triggered.
Could it be because my combobox are disabled?
But why does it work on Windows?
I really hope someone can help me please.
Thanks in advance.
I have observed in the past that some window managers steal the focus temporarily from Tk on each button click before setting it back; I suspect that this has to do with the way that key event handling works, but I am unable to check at the moment (due to being on OSX, where things are different). Because of the complexities involved, I'd suggest that if you bind to <FocusOut>, you should also check whether you get a <FocusIn> event shortly after; a little extra delay (e.g., 0.1s) before doing the update of the buttons' disabled status will not hurt.
Or you could hang the code to do the disabling off the entry widget validation engine, perhaps like this:
.e configure -validation focusout -validatecommand doButtonEnableDisable
The validation interface is the same for both the old style entry and the new style ttk::entry widgets. It's also supported by spinboxes. Just be aware that you need to return a boolean true from doButtonEnableDisable or you'll reject the change to the entry, and you should take care to ensure that your code does not produce an error or it will disable itself; the docs list the things to watch out for.
I'm working on a I/O verification tool based on Linux in a game project. It is written in C++, and,since using the same I/O module as our game, it's based on OIS 1.2. Thus, though all I need is to print users' inputs on the console, I still need to create a window for OIS.
So here comes my question: How can I create a mapped window while it is still invisible and processes keyboard events?
I can't unmapped the window in that it won't process any keyboard event anymore. I also can't find function for show/hide a window.(maybe I search through a wrong diretion...)
My little tool works fine now except there is a stupid top-level empty window which needs to be focused for processing keyboard events...
Any advise is welcomed.
Thanks!!!
After reading this post: Linux/X11 input library without creating a window,
I realized my problem was that I misunderstood the philosophy of X11. All I need to do is simply pass the root window handle to OIS, and set the x11_grabkeyboard flag as true. The only drawback is maybe I can hardly debug my program with gdb since the keyboard is grabbed...
Though my situation is solved, there is one thing left.
Every article I read said an InputOnly window won't be visible and is capable for handling input events, while my InputOnly window is absolutely visible after mapped...
Maybe it's my Linux, or again, a misunderstanding...