I have created the following Vnets
vnet-hub-poc-hubspoke is the Hub Vnet
and both the Vnets are peered as per the HUB-SPOKE model
vnet-hub-poc-hubspoke being a Hub Vnet, it has Azure firewall configured
both the Vnets are connected to Azure Private DNS
Azure Private DNS has a record pointing to the VM deployed on the vnet-prod-poc-hubspoke Vnet
and I could access the FQDN within the internal network
after adding the below rule in Azure Firewall, I could access the website using the firewall public IP
Now, instead of firewall public IP I want to use the domain name like
http://myfirstweb.private.landingzonedomain.com/ (for now, I have updated the hosts file in the client machine pointing to firewall public IP)
what should I do at the azure firewall level so that it would translate Internet URL to Internal/Intranet URL like
http://myfirstweb.private.landingzonedomain.local/
What you want is not possible, because you cannot assign a domain name to your Azure Firewall. What you could do is to create a DNS record at a domain name provider that translates a custom domain to your Azure firewall public IP.
Although I have seen people routing inbound traffic in their vnet, Azure firewall is mainly designed for controlling outbound traffic and traffic flowing between (peered) vnets. When you want to direct inbound traffic to a website or service inside your vnet, you can choose between:
Application Gateway
Frontdoor
Combination of both
All the options above allow you to add custom domains and certificates. On the other hand, when you want to access a virtual machine through rdp or ssh, your main options are:
Bastion host (i.e. jumpbox)
VPN
Cloud Shell
Related
I have the following situation:
If I deploy an application (Deployment, Service and Ingress) in my kubernetes cluster, my ingress deployment is being automatically added to my application gateway (I am using the Azure Application Gateway Ingress Controller; https://azure.github.io/application-gateway-kubernetes-ingress/annotations/ ). So far so good.
That means that my application can be reached via my application gateway via https://my-app-gateway-public-ip/myAppPath/. Also, I have an additional private DNS zone which makes my app accessible via https://dns-name/myAppPath.
Additionally, we have an AADDS in combination with a Bastion Service. Deployed some virtual machines and the virtual machines use the DNS resolver of the AADDS (for authentication against the AAD).
The problem is: If I am outside of the cloud, I can nslookup the dns or can access the site via the ip, but I cannot do that with my virtual machines. My DNS server (within the AADDS) is unable to resolve the dns or accessing the ip. I am wondering what the issue is.
The bastion and AADDS are in different subscriptions and therefore different virtual networks. I established already a peering between those virtual networks (or the authentication between the AADDS and the VMs wouldn't work).
The kubernetes cluster and the application gateway are also in a different subscription, but no peering has been done so far.
Are there any hints what I could be missing?
Kind regards
• Since, you are using a Bastion gateway server to connect to the VMs hosted in your subscription, the Bastion gateway server must be having a public IP address through which then the registered underlying VMs can be connected to via private links created in the private DNS zones associated with a particular virtual network in a subnet and an assigned private IP address and a FQDN accordingly. Thus, if you want to access the application website hosted behind the application gateway, then you will have to create a conditional forwarder in the DNS zone in AADDS to redirect the internal requests from the VMs hosted within a virtual network to the public IP address of the website hosted behind the application gateway
• Thus, a conditional forwarder forwards the DNS resolution requests for a particular resource hosted on the public internet for which the DNS host resolution is not found or done in that DNS zone which usually serves or fulfils the requests related to internal environment. As a result, when a VM configured with a private IP is registered as a host in the internal DNS zone queries the public IP or FQDN associated with the application’s website, the DNS requests are forwarded to the public internet through the conditional forwarder and then the results are displayed in the VM’s browser for the application’s webpage. Thus, the VMs don’t need to have internet access but the DNS server should have or should forward the requests through the Internet proxy server accordingly to reach the internet.
For more information on creating conditional forwarder in AADDS, kindly refer to the below link: -
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/active-directory-domain-services/manage-dns#create-conditional-forwarders
Is there a VPN solution in Azure that can assign a static public IP to the clients connected for me to achieve full tunnelling? may be in P2S VPN?
P2S VPN does not have full tunneling. Is there any other alternate solution?
• No, you can’t assign a static public IP address to the clients for a VPN solution in Azure as the client address pool that needs to be defined while deploying a VPN gateway in Azure is a subnet of the IP address spaces that the virtual network is created out of.
But you can configure forced tunnelling in your Azure virtual network on your VPN gateway subnets as illustrated below. In the below image, forced tunnelling is shown for Site-to-Site VPN scenario but it can also be implemented for Point-to-Site VPN scenarios in the same way. The Frontend subnet is not force tunneled. The workloads in the Frontend subnet can continue to accept and respond to customer requests from the Internet directly. The Mid-tier and Backend subnets are forced tunneled. Any outbound connections from these two subnets to the Internet will be forced or redirected back to an on-premises site via one of the Site-to-site (S2S) VPN tunnels as shown below.
This allows you to restrict and inspect Internet access from your virtual machines or cloud services in Azure, while continuing to enable your multi-tier service architecture required. If there are no Internet-facing workloads in your virtual networks, you also can apply forced tunneling to the entire virtual networks.: -
• Also, please note that you can *configure the above for your P2S clients by securing the Internet traffic via Firewall Manager and advertising the 0.0.0.0/0 route to your VPN clients. This makes your clients send all internet bound traffic to Azure for inspection. Then, firewall SNATs the packet to the PIP of Azure Firewall for egress to Internet. For this purpose, setup the Azure Firewall Policy to allow P2S traffic to Internet and to advertise all the traffic from 0.0.0.0/0 to your VPN clients, you would need to break them into two smaller subnets 0.0.0.0/1 and 128.0.0.0/1 as mentioned in the below documentation: -
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/vpn-gateway/vpn-gateway-p2s-advertise-custom-routes#forced-tunneling
Also, you can add the code below in your ‘azurevpnconfig.xml’ file that can be directly downloaded from the templates section if the above said subnets cannot be added in ‘Default Routes’ on the portal.
<clientconfig>
<includeroutes>
<route>
<destination>0.0.0.0</destination><mask>1</mask>
</route>
<route>
<destination>128.0.0.0</destination><mask>1</mask>
</route>
</includeroutes>
</clientconfig>
I am running a Linux container as a web app in an internal ASE.
The ASE is deployed to a Vnet (secondary Vnet) which is peered to a another Vnet(Primary vnet) where an Azure firewall exists.
1.I have Enable service endpoints to SQL, Storage, and Event Hub on your ASE subnet.
2.From the Azure Firewall UI > Rules > Application rule collection, Set App Service Environment FQDN Tag and the Windows Update Tag.
3.From the Azure Firewall UI > Rules > Network rule collection, Set the ports to 123.Create another rule the same way to port 12000 to help triage any system issues.
4.Create a route table with the management addresses from App Service Environment management addresses with a next hop of Internet, set 0.0.0.0/0 directed to the network appliance ( Firewall internal IP address)
5.Create Application rules to allow HTTP/HTTPS traffic (Note: address is the IP of the ILB of the Internal ASE, since I cant find an IP for the web app itself)
I don't seem to be able to reach the web app. Any guidance will be appreciated. is the problem that I created an Internal ASE?
I am trying to isolate the ISE and control external access to it via a firewall.
MSDocs I referenced :https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/app-service/environment/firewall-integration
Yes, I think it's the problem with internal ASE. Also, the referring document is intended to lock down all egress from the ASE VNet. Inbound management traffic for an ASE can not be sent through a firewall device.
There are a number of inbound dependencies that an ASE has. The
inbound management traffic cannot be sent through a firewall device.
The source addresses for this traffic are known and are published in
the App Service Environment management addresses document. You can
create Network Security Group rules with that information to secure
inbound traffic.
In addition, since it's an internal ASE, it is deployed in your VNet with ILB. You can not directly access its backend web app over the Internet, you need at least a public-facing Ip address (external VIP )or other public-facing services(Public Azure application gateway) in front of it.
It will like this,
I have a VMSS/svc fabric cluster on internal vnet (not public). The only inbound connections to the VMSS is from on prem through a Azure VPN Gateway.
How do I control the outbound IP address the VMSS go through when accessing the internet? In this case I do not want this traffic routed through a random IP address or through the VPN connection.
Basically I want to secure my Azure SQL so that the outbound internet IPs of the VMSS is whitelisted. And I don't want to add all Azure datacenter IPs.
You could look to use Forced Tunneling which would ensure that your control where the data egress occurs in your on-premises environment, however this would force any data in your Virtual Network back over your VPN connection which may not be desirable (or helpful if you don't control egress from there).
Failing this you could add a software-based firewall running on an Azure VM with a public IP onto the same VNet and then use User Defined Routes (UDRs) to force all traffic bound for the Internet to go via that and then use the public IP address in your SQL firewall.
Longer term you will be able to connect Azure SQL DB to VNets (or at least restrict access to it from one) - see the Uservoice site (and add your vote!)
Does anyone know if its possible to have my corporate azure account to be assigned a block (e.g. subnet) of azure public IP within a region to make it easier to create firewall rules for my corporate firewall which blocks most outgoing ports.
Our customer does not want anyone sourced inside from the corporate .com account to have access to all 22 and 3389 ports out on the internet, but will limit them to a subnet if we can be assigned a subnet on which we will hang our bastion servers on.
I wouldn't know about blocks of IP's, but you can certainly create a virtual network in which you create all your resources in Azure, and hten configure a firewall in azure, which will have a permanent IP. This can then be used to set up a site-to-site VPN thing between your corporate network and the machines in Azure.
https://azure.microsoft.com/en-gb/services/virtual-network/
For public facing ports, you can add another virtual network card and rest assured that the traffic on one card cannot, in any way pass over to the other, network connected card.
This would also be a better strategy than to set up a range of VM's in Azure with public IP's.