In fork, the parent and child share the code, so if I modify the code content in the child (for example, by self-modifying), can the parent execute the modified content when it reaches the corresponding part?
Related
I'm trying to attach a ComponentFoo to a whole scene coming from a gltf file. From what I understand I need to put the scene entities under a parent entity possessing that ComponentFoo.
commands
.spawn_scene(asset_server.load("models/FlightHelmet/FlightHelmet.gltf"));
.with(ComponentFoo {})
gives the following error:
panicked at 'Cannot add component because the 'current entity' is not set.
and as expected, that doesn't work either:
commands
.spawn_scene(asset_server.load("models/FlightHelmet/FlightHelmet.gltf"));
.current_entity()
.unwrap()
How do I get a parent Entity of the scene? Or at list iterate over all entities of that scene? The gltf loader seems to add a parent entity containing a Transform at the root of the loaded scenes, how could I pinpoint it?
I use DataViewTreeCtrl to show a parents-children tree and I want to remove a parent (Container) once the last child of it is removed. I could not find a method to get the container/parent of a child from GetSelections() and the only way I can seem to think of is writing an algorithm that will iterate through the entire tree to find the selected item and its parent that will be called each time an item is to be removed.
I want to pass a child component state to Store without interacting with a parent component in NGXS-Store?
previous I have pass child state to parent using EventEmmiter, Inside parent component Html take and then parent component pass child component state to Store ......But now I need to pass child component state to directly Store not Interacting with parent component
You dispatch an action to update state. You can do that from the child component exactly as you would in the parent component. If you're asking something else then an example of what you are trying to do would be helpful.
What should be the best UX for a situation where one set of record cannot exist without another.
Take a scenario in an application where a child can be connected to zero or more parents.
If a user of our application finds himself filling a form to create a child but the parent for the child does not exist yet, what is the best approach to creating the parent and then attaching that parent to the child.
Should the child be created without the parent, but updates can be done to add parent to child, note that this also has its own issues as the page where the addition will occur might also need to create the parent.
Have a link on the child page that says "create parent", and route back the user back to the child page after creating the parent.
Have a button bring up a modal that has the parent form and allow the user to create the parent before returning.
I don't like any one of these three options and I am hoping there are better approach out there.
Sorry for any typos or ambiguity, in bit of a rush, also not sure if this is the right place to ask the question.
Since the records are depending on each other I would make sure the user submits these together but make it look like 2 different elements on the same page.
You could use a tab-menu to switch between the child and parent but both should be filled in before submitting. Some inspiration even though you don't need to fill in multiple tabs here. Just make sure it's easy for the user to see that he needs to fill in both tabs.
Another option could be to have the child form collapse when finished/closed like a drop-down menu with an expand arrow button incase you want to edit it again. And the same with a parent box below it. Something that looks a little like this.
They could both be closed at the loading of the page so the user sees both boxes.
I have a Dialog in which I've linked a child Dialog. I want to the execution of the Dialog to the parent dialog once my child dialog has completed executing.
How can I achieve this? My child dialog isn't throwing the execution back to the parent Dialog in Dynamics CRM.
That's not how they work out of the box. When you go to a child you transfer control to child and the parent ends.
You could look to rearrange your dialog;so the last step of the child, is to start the parent as a child dialog. The parent dialog would then need to somehow skip to the right page. Or it might be easier to break the parent dialog into multiple parts, which are chained together using start child.