How to go back to the Working Directory that was not committed - linux

I forgot to commit on the directory where I was working and then I checkout to the previous commit and now I want to back to the directory where I used to work. What can i do ?

If your checkout of the previous version somehow deleted your folder, which was not added/committed, then you would need to rely on a file recovery utility, as detailed in "Can I restore deleted files (undo a git clean -fdx)?", or on your IDE. Some of them keep a local history (IntelliJ IDEA, VSCode through an extension, ...): you might get back some of your files content that way.
In the end, it depends on the exact git checkout command you did, considering this command can update files and/or branches.
That is why it is recommanded to use git switch (branch only) or git restore (files only), instead of git checkout.

Related

Moved local git folder and now its asking to stage most of my project files?

I reinstalled my OS (KDE neon) and I thought why not backup my project git folder, before I reinstalled I made sure I commited any code and everything in my git project folder was up-to-date.
So after reinstalling, I moved my project back onto my PC from my backup drive and ran git-status and it wants to stage nearly all of my project?
What do I do? I don't want to commit all these files again when I have not editing any of them? Its nearly 800 files it wants to stage?
You could reset your project using:
git reset --hard branch_name
This would lose any unstaged files.
Or you could stash the changes:
git stash save 'msg'
This works like the previous one, but instead it saves the unstaged files in a separate "memory" (in case you need them later on).
Now, I may assume that the reason you got that situation in the first place is maybe when you restored your data back from the drive, the OS changed some properties on those files, stuff like creation/modification dates, permissions...etc. While the content of the files has not changed but the properties are. Still, git sees them as modified files.

Handling line endings for git

Here is what I messed up so far,
I copied (not cloned) a rails project from windows to linux pc
Then created a new branch and made lots of changes
At last commited twice whole project and pushed it to a remote repository with windows line endings.
Problem: so my problem is that, since I copied the project from windows to linux, when I run git status whole project shows modified. I don't see the changes I made specifically. Since I committed and pushed whole project, I lost history of files change.
What is needed: So I want to remove my last two commit but I want to keep my changes that I made. Then I want to convert the line endings from windows to unix of whole project so that when I run git status I see only the files that I changed, not whole project. And then I want to commit and push to remote.
It would be nice if there is a solution for this mess.
I am not sure if this will be helpful, I am working on a rails project and my IDE is rubymine.
To undo your last two commits run this:
git reset --soft HEAD~2. This will put the files involved in the commits into your working directory.
Run git status and they will show as staged changes (ready for commit).
Edit your files.
Stage and commit your changes. Important: Don't push
Run git pull.
Run git push
Make sure you commit your changes and do a git pull prior to git push, otherwise your attempt to push will cause conflict and will be rejected.
You can use git filter-branch.
Similar question here.

Git checkout untracked issue

I'm collaborating with a few other people on a Drupal website which we are version controlling Git. We setup a local Git repository containing our commits.
After a colleague pushed some updates and I fetched and merged into my local dev branch, I began experiencing the following problems:
user#server:/var/www/Intranet/sites/intranet/modules/custom$ git checkout dev
error: The following untracked working tree files would be overwritten by checkout:
themes/bigcompany/panels/layouts/radix_bryant_flipped/radix-bryant-flipped.png
themes/bigcompany/panels/layouts/radix_bryant_flipped/radix-bryant-flipped.tpl.php
themes/bigcompany/panels/layouts/radix_bryant_flipped/radix_bryant_flipped.inc
Please move or remove them before you can switch branches.
Aborting
The issue above typically shows up when I try to checkout into other branches which fails and I am effectively trapped in my current branch.
Referring to this question, there is a suggestion my issue is related to the gitignore file. However, my .gitignore file has nothing indicating any part of my themes directory should be ignored as the following shows:
# .gitignore for a standard Drupal 7 build based in the sites subdirectory.
# Drupal
files
settings.php
settings.*.php
# Sass.
.sass-cache
# Composer
vendor/
# Migrate sourec files
modules/custom/haringeygovuk_migrate/source_data
As mentioned above, my attempts to execute git checkout into any branch fails with the message above. I decided to force it with the -f switch and successfully switched into my target branch but I lost a couple of hundred lines of code - which I'd love to avoid going forward.
I work on a Linux-Ubuntu VirtualBox which my colleagues prefer working in a WAMP setup and use the Git Bash terminal emulator for executing the Git commands. Could the difference in environments be causing these serious issues?
How can I resolve this issue?
Well, the situation is rather simple. You, in your current branch, don't have certain files under the control of Git, but at the same time, you have those files in your working tree. The branch you're trying to switch to, has those files, so git would need to override files in the working tree to perform checkout.
To prevent possible data loss, Git stops the process of switching the branches and notifies you that you should either add those files under the control of Git in a separate commit in your current branch, and only then perform the switch, or simply remove those files from the git way.
Likely you have chosen the second way. Generally you should "force" any operation only if you really understand what you're doing.

How to delete files from master of stash

Hi anybody could help me in deleting files from the master of stash?
I am new to stash and git commands and while commiting the initial version to stash all the files from the project folder got committed to the repository but i want that files to be placed inside a folder wheras now it is all scattered over there. Please do help me in deleting those files and again commit the files inside the folder.Is this possible or do I need to delete the repsitory itself?
A stash is a patch and is local.
You could save a stash to a file with git stash show -p > stash1.patch and remove it with git stash drop (apply and remove it with git stash pop), otherwise follow the git-stash documentation and tutorial: https://git-scm.com/book/en/v1/Git-Tools-Stashing; there is almost everything you need to know in the manual...

svn Merge Problem (3 levels of svn)

I am new to use svn and the company in which I work uses three levels (I don't know whether this is a correct word to use here) of svn. I mean the developers are provided a working directory on a testing server. When we commit, it goes to the dev server. When a manager commits it from there it goes to production server. I am a developer here and one of my files is giving error (conflict) when I commit from directory. Not only, but also it gives conflict when manager tries to commit. I am now given access as manager too but I am still unable to resolve it.
What I've tried till now:
svn update
svn delete
svn commit
It gives conflict on all of these operations.
Earlier on a simple error happened and the manager preferred to just delete file on dev, copy it manually and then commit from there. I don't know this may be a reason of this problem or not.
Please help me resolve this issue. I've read some things in read-bean book too but to no avail yet.
Thanks
Ok, here's the update. The actual problem is that a file (ex lib/a.php) used to be in my working directory as well as in dev and production servers. Now it was deleted by someone (using del command, not svn delete) from dev server. Now question here is how I add it again so that it becomes part of svn again. The simple svn add doesn't work.
Update 2
From one of the answers below I understood that its a tree conflict. Some searching brought me to http://svnbook.red-bean.com/nightly/en/svn.tour.treeconflicts.html . Following the instructions, I took the backup of the file and then svn delete it from everywhere. Then I svn add it to my directory, commit it and tried to update dev and production. End result is that it doesn't go there. No error is shown either.
svn info in my directory shows complete info of the file but on dev and production it shows
file_name: (Not a versioned resource)
:S
Any more ideas please?
Alternatively you can take backup of the file ,then say svn revert filename insert you new code.Do a svn up just to make sure you do not have any conflicts,and then commit
Or
fix the conflicts in the file and then you can say svn resolved filename and then you can continue operations on the file
Update:If your file is deleted using rm or del command use svn revert filename to get it back and you do not have to add it again.Just put in your new changes and say svn ci -m"your comments" filename
svn revert will fetch back the last checked in copy into SVN and it wouldnt have your any changes made before the user had used del command
Update 2:After u say svn delete ,u need to commit it until u get the message Deleting filename with a new revision number.Then add the file using svn add command,then commit again.Once this is done you can check the svn info, let me know..
Use svn status command to know the status of the file
The only problem apart from this i can think of is this the directory may not have been added.Is this a new directory?
ah, the old tree conflict problem.
The issue is that SVN is letting you know that you're adding a file that used to be there but it cannot tell whether you're trying to delete it, add it or just update it! So it does the only thing it can - flags a conflict so you can sort it out and fix it. Its basically a conflict on the directory level (rather than a conflict of a file's contents).
What you do is resolve the error (as others have pointed out), then update the directory to get the original file back, then commit your changes. Note that the file was never deleted from SVN - its still in the repo, and if you checkout out a new WC, you'd get the file.
Try to resolve the conflicts then commit again:
svn resolve --accept working

Resources