I have 3 different rankings in my excel.
I need to create overall ranking.
If there are no duplicate values on rank 1 => overall should looks exactly like rank 1.
If there are duplicate values on rank 1 (like on image) => overall rank should check rank 1 and see which of these duplicates have higher rank in rank 2. (same with rank 2 and 3)
So in this case overall should be: (from top) 2;1;3
Is it possible to make using excel functions?
Is it possible to make using excel functions?
My straight answer (with my very small excel knowledge) : No.
Is there methods to get there : Yes.
Method one (GUI) :
excel-built in
Method two (manual, expandable, (my personal favorite) less function dependent) :
Since you have quite a number of column/rows involved, understanding an expandable method should do then. The main sequence is : (1) put a weight , apply to (each) list > (2) generate product > sort/rank .
Step 1 :
Assuming your data is located at A2:C4, in A6 put : =1/COLUMN() and drag till C6.
in A7 put : =A2*A$6 and drag till C9.
Step 2 :
In E7 put : =SUM(A7:C7) and drag till E9.
Step 3 :
In G7 : =RANK.AVG(E7,$E$7:$E$9,1) and drag till G9.
And that is your desired rank.
The idea : since the 'tie' in the 1st column is determined by the next column, then applying less weight as the column number raise is suitable (you can always use any number you want, as long as it answers the 'tie-braker' requirement). In the end, the row with the least weight will raise up as the smallest number.
Please share if it works/not/understandable. /(^_^)
Try in E2:
=IF(COUNTIF($E$1:E1,SUMPRODUCT(--(($A$2:$A$4+$B$2:$B$4+$C$2:$C$4)<SUM(A2:C2)))+1)>0,SUMPRODUCT(--(($A$2:$A$4+$B$2:$B$4+$C$2:$C$4)<SUM(A2:C2)))+2,SUMPRODUCT(--(($A$2:$A$4+$B$2:$B$4+$C$2:$C$4)<SUM(A2:C2)))+1)
Drag down.
Related
I am currently trying to check if a number in a comma-separated string is within a number interval. What I am trying to do is to check if an area code (from the comma-separated string) is within the interval of an area.
The data:
AREAS
Area interval
Name
Number of locations
1000-1499
Area 1
?
1500-1799
Area 2
?
1800-1999
Area 3
?
GEOLOCATIONS
Name
Areas List
Location A
1200, 1400
Location B
1020, 1720
Location C
1700, 1920
Location D
1940, 1950, 1730
The result I want here is the number of unique locations in the "Areas list" within the area interval. So Location D should only count ONCE in the 1800-1999 "area", and the Location A the same in the 1000-1499 location. But location B should count as one in both 1000-1499 and one in 1500-1799 (because a number from each interval is in the comma-separated string in "Areas list"):
Area interval
Name
Number of locations
1000-1499
Area 1
2
1500-1799
Area 2
3
1800-1999
Area 3
2
How is this possible?
I have tried with a COUNTIFS, but it doesnt seem to do the job.
Here is one option using FILTERXML():
Formula in C2:
=SUM(FILTERXML("<x><t>"&TEXTJOIN("</s></t><t>",,"1<s>"&SUBSTITUTE(B$7:B$10,", ","</s><s>"))&"</s></t></x>","//t[count(.//*[.>="&SUBSTITUTE(A2,"-","][.<=")&"])>0]"))
Where:
"<x><t>"&TEXTJOIN("</s></t><t>",,"1<s>"&SUBSTITUTE(B$7:B$10,", ","</s><s>"))&"</s></t></x>" - Is the part where we construct a valid piece of XML. The theory here is that we use three axes here. Each t-node will be named a literal 1 to make sure that once we return them with xpath we can sum the result. The outer x-nodes are there to make sure Excel will handle the inner axes correctly. If you are curious to know how this xml-syntax looks at the end, it's best to step through using the 'Evaluate Formula' function on the Data-tab;
//t[count(.//*[.>="&SUBSTITUTE(A2,"-","][.<=")&"])>0]")) - Basically means that we collect all t-nodes where the count of child s-nodes that are >= to the leftmost number and <= to the rightmost number is larger than zero. For A2 the xpath would look like //t[count(.//*[.>=1000][.<=1499])>0]")) after substitution. In short: //t - Select t-nodes, where count(.//* select all child-nodes where count of nodes that fullfill both requirements [.>=1000][.<=1499] is larger than zero;
Since all t-nodes equal the number 1, the SUM() of these t-nodes equals the amount of unique locations that have at least one area in its Areas List;
Important to note that FILTERXML() will result into an error if no t-nodes could be found. That would mean we need to wrap the FILTERXML() in an IFERROR(...., 0) to counter that and make the SUM() still work correctly.
Or, wrap the above in BYROW():
Formula in C2:
=BYROW(A2:A4,LAMBDA(a,SUM(FILTERXML("<x><t>"&TEXTJOIN("</s></t><t>",,"1<s>"&SUBSTITUTE(B$7:B$10,", ","</s><s>"))&"</s></t></x>","//t[count(.//*[.>="&SUBSTITUTE(a,"-","][.<=")&"])>0]"))))
Using MMULT and TEXTSPLIT:
=LET(rng,TEXTSPLIT(D2,"-"),
tarr,IFERROR(--TRIM(TEXTSPLIT(TEXTJOIN(";",,$B$2:$B$5),",",";")),0),
SUM(--(MMULT((tarr>=--TAKE(rng,,1))*(tarr<=--TAKE(rng,,-1)),SEQUENCE(COLUMNS(tarr),,1,0))>0)))
I am in very distinguished company but will add my version anyway as byrow probably is a slightly different approach
=LET(range,B$2:B$5,
lowerLimit,--#TEXTSPLIT(E2,"-"),
upperLimit,--INDEX(TEXTSPLIT(E2,"-"),2),
counts,BYROW(range,LAMBDA(r,SUM((--TEXTSPLIT(r,",")>=lowerLimit)*(--TEXTSPLIT(r,",")<=upperLimit)))),
SUM(--(counts>0))
)
Here the ugly way to do it, with A LOT of helper columns. But not so complicated 🙂
F4= =TRANSPOSE(FILTERXML("<m><r>"&SUBSTITUTE(B4;",";"</r><r>")&"</r></m>";"//r"))
F11= =TRANSPOSE(FILTERXML("<m><r>"&SUBSTITUTE(A11;"-";"</r><r>")&"</r></m>";"//r"))
F16= =SUM(F18:F21)
F18= =IF(SUM(($F4:$O4>=$F$11)*($F4:$O4<=$G$11))>0;1;"")
G18= =IF(SUM(($F4:$O4>=$F$12)*($F4:$O4<=$G$12))>0;1;"")
H18= =IF(SUM(($F4:$O4>=$F$13)*($F4:$O4<=$G$13))>0;1;"")
I am trying to return the name of the top N scorers given their
team played for and
position played. I've used INDEX(MATCH(LARGE) to return the top N scorer but haven't been able to successfully add IFS to the LARGE to create my criteria.This is my master list.
I want to find the highest value in colE given colD=KINGMANE and colC=D
In H21 I want to return the D from KINGMANE with the highest FPts. J19 is the team name,, colF is the position I want to look at, and colG is the rank I want to return.
The Syntax you're looking for the multi-conditional lookup based on rank would be the following. I'm assuming your range ends are 40 so adjust accordingly.:
=INDEX([YourTable],MATCH(1,(LARGE($E$1:$E$40,1)=$E$1:$E$40)*($D$1:$D$40="KINGMANE")*($C$1:$C$40=[Position]),0),1)
Breaking this down into references just plug in
=INDEX([YourTable],MATCH(1,(LARGE($E$1:$E$40,[Rank #])=$E$1:$E$40)*($D$1:$D$40="KINGMANE")*($C$1:$C$40"[Position]),0),1)
How can I return the ranking of each value in a row, even in the case of duplicates? Please see my example below.
While many questions have been answered regarding the handling of duplicate values in a ranking, I have come short in achieving a method that works for all of my cases.
EDIT: The previous picture above was a bad example that did not address my problem. Here is a new picture of the behavior.
In certain cases it skips to 7 when the rank should only be 1:6. In other cases it seems to work, and then not work in similar cases. Data is:
2.61879723030607 2.3428 2.61879723030607 2.4571 2.7324 2.1790
2.97203355745108 2.5355 2.97203355745108 2.6721 3.0561 2.4136
2.4895 2.2781 2.6218 2.4369 2.6898 2.1361
2.32650000000000 2.2124 2.3453 2.32650000000000 2.3938 2.0283
2.34132608128450 2.1331 2.34132608128450 2.2800 2.5758 2.0446
2.58668483692925 2.1476 2.58668483692925 2.3019 2.5124 2.0135
2.2555 2.0884 2.3368 2.0980 2.3928 1.9787
2.32878217762168 2.1080 2.32878217762168 2.1250 2.5360 1.9807
2.50891263421977 2.2480 2.50891263421977 2.4239 2.9070 2.2638
2.97755287506272 2.4457 2.97755287506272 2.6830 3.0566 2.3987
3.0850 2.5380 5.3880 2.8304 3.1579 2.5030
3.0120 2.3815 3.0639 2.6762 3.0831 2.4253
2.49235468138485 2.1436 2.49235468138485 2.3159 2.5542 1.9991
2.13109025589563 2.1060 2.13109025589563 2.1555 2.3225 1.9787
2.24900295032614 2.0332 2.24900295032614 2.1780 2.5084 2.0043
2.4010 2.0438 2.5857 2.2126 2.4511 2.0329
EDIT2: Implementing RANK instead of RANK.EQ showing no difference:
I think you've got an error in your setup. My understanding is each row is meant to be a separate independent case, however your formula for calculating rank has fixed row and column references, when it should have only fixed column references. Right now, the rank for every value is being found based on the first row in your data. Instead of:
=RANK.EQ(B4,$B$4:$G$4,1)
It should be:
=RANK.EQ(B4,$B4:$G4,1)
This then alters your results in the 2nd and 3rd blocks and you should get the desired result in the 3rd block.
With the formula below in Cell B2:B4 you can filter the unique numbers in Column A.
Please note that this is an array formula so once you enter it you have to mark it and press CTRL + ALT + DEL. Hope this solves your problem. More details regarding this formula you can also find here https://exceljet.net/formula/extract-unique-items-from-a-list
Column A Column B
1
1 1 = {=INDEX($A$1:$A$5000,MATCH(0,COUNTIF($B$1:B1,$A$1:$A$5000),0))}
1 2 = {=INDEX($A$1:$A$5000,MATCH(0,COUNTIF($B$1:B2,$A$1:$A$5000),0))}
1 6 = {=INDEX($A$1:$A$5000,MATCH(0,COUNTIF($B$1:B3,$A$1:$A$5000),0))}
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
Try RANK instead of RANK.EQ as below. Though I am not sure whether this will work as I am testing on Excel 07.
Enter the following formula in Cell H1
=RANK(A1,$A1:$F1,1)+COUNTIF($A1:A1,A1)-1
Copy/Drag the formula down and across (to right) as required. See image for reference.
As per Microsoft Documentation on RANK.EQ function here
RANK.EQ gives duplicate numbers the same rank. However, the presence of duplicate numbers affects the ranks of subsequent numbers. For example, in a list of integers sorted in ascending order, if the number 10 appears twice and has a rank of 5, then 11 would have a rank of 7 (no number would have a rank of 6)
A B
1 Pilot1
3 Pilot2
4 Pilot3
6 Pilot4
15 Pilot5
10 Pilot6
3 Pilot7
8 Pilot8
15 Pilot9
What is the excel formula for looking up the highest value(s) in column A and returning the Pilot(s) name(s).
I am using right now:
=MAX(A1:A9) to return the max number cuz I need that info too.
And
=VLOOKUP(MAX(A1:A9), A1:B9, 2, FALSE)
and this give me the answer if there is on max or the first it comes to for multiple maxes.
So I would get with this:
15
Pilot5
It does not give me
15
15
Pilot5
Pilot9
I want the results to show:
15 - for the max # of flights done
Pilot5
Pilot9 - for the names of the pilots that have the max flight count
So I noted above a more elegant way to do this in Google Sheets. And there are some very obscure ways out there, but here is something simple. The downside is it does show some extra information. Let us say your data is in A1:B9 and in A10 you have =MAX(A1:A9) [this is not strictly needed, but like you said, you want it anyway -- and it makes the formula a little less ugly]
Then in C1 put the formula =if(A1=A$10,B1,"") which will be blank if the pilot is not the max and have the pilot name otherwise. Drag that formula down through C9. Now in C10 (or wherever) put =TEXTJOIN(", ",true,C1:C9)
which will put together your pilot(s) separated by comma and space, and with blank entries omitted.
I have 3 columns with the following name:
name1, name2 and value.
I want to obtain in another sheet two tables having two compulsory condition (min and max calculated using name1 and name2):
the name of the first table to be taken from the column with name2 and this table has two partition.
the first partition named max, is calculating the max for 30_-20, 40_-20, 50_-20, 30_22, 40_22, 50_22, 30_60, 40_60, 50_60 and second partition named min, is calculating the min for 30_-20, 40_-20, 50_-20, 30_22, 40_22, 50_22, 30_60, 40_60, 50_60.
What I want to say can be viewed in the following picture.
I need this for my job, and I don't know anything about macros. I think it will be necessary to learn macros.
Given a layout on a single worksheet similar to your sample image.
   Â
The standard formula(s) for G3, I3, M3 and O3 are:
=MAX(INDEX($C$2:$C$999*($A$2:$A$999=H3)*($B$2:$B$999=H$1), , ))
=MIN(INDEX($C$2:$C$999+(($A$2:$A$999<>H3)+($B$2:$B$999<>H$1))*1E+99, , ))
=MAX(INDEX($C$2:$C$999*($A$2:$A$999=N3)*($B$2:$B$999=N$1), , ))
=MIN(INDEX($C$2:$C$999+(($A$2:$A$999<>N3)+($B$2:$B$999<>N$1))*1E+99, , ))
Fill down as necessary. It is usually easier to reference a cell containing a value (e.g. 30_-20) than repeatedly hardcoding the value into a variety of similar formulas. I've used H3:H5 and N3:N5 for the column A values.
How it Works:
See MINIF, MAXIF and MODEIF with Standard Formulas.