I am trying to implement a 5 class animal classifier using Keras. I am building the CNN from scratch and the weird thing is, the validation accuracy stays constant at 0.20 for all epochs. Any idea why this is happening? The dataset folder contains train, test and validation folders. And each of the folders contains 5 folders corresponding to the 5 classes. What am I doing wrong?
I have tried multiple optimizer but the problem persists. I have included the code sample below.
import warnings
warnings.filterwarnings("ignore")
#First convolution layer
model = Sequential()
model.add(Conv2D(filters=32, kernel_size=(3, 3), activation='relu',kernel_initializer='he_normal',input_shape=input_shape))
model.add(MaxPooling2D(pool_size=(2, 2)))
#Second convolution layer
model.add(Conv2D(filters=64, kernel_size=(3, 3), activation='relu',kernel_initializer='he_normal',input_shape=input_shape))
model.add(MaxPooling2D(pool_size=(2, 2)))
#Flatten the outputs of the convolution layer into a 1D contigious array
model.add(Flatten())
#Add a fully connected layer containing 256 neurons
model.add(Dense(256, activation='relu',kernel_initializer='he_normal'))
model.add(BatchNormalization())
#Add another fully connected layer containing 256 neurons
model.add(Dense(256, activation='relu',kernel_initializer='he_normal'))
model.add(BatchNormalization())
#Add the ouput layer containing 5 neurons, because we have 5 categories
model.add(Dense(5, activation='softmax',kernel_initializer='glorot_uniform'))
optim=RMSprop(lr=1e-6)
model.compile(loss='categorical_crossentropy',optimizer=optim,metrics=['accuracy'])
model.summary()
#We will use the below code snippet for rescaling the images to 0-1 for all the train and test images
train_datagen = ImageDataGenerator(rescale=1./255)
#We won't augment the test data. We will just use ImageDataGenerator to rescale the images.
test_datagen = ImageDataGenerator(rescale=1./255)
train_generator = train_datagen.flow_from_directory(train_data_dir,
classes=['frog', 'giraffe', 'horse', 'tiger','dog'],
target_size=(img_width, img_height),
batch_size=batch_size,
class_mode='categorical',
shuffle=False)
validation_generator = test_datagen.flow_from_directory(validation_data_dir,
classes=['frog', 'giraffe', 'horse', 'tiger','dog'],
target_size=(img_width, img_height),
batch_size=batch_size,
class_mode='categorical',
shuffle=False)
hist=History()
model.fit_generator(train_generator,
steps_per_epoch=nb_train_samples // batch_size,
epochs=epochs,
validation_data=validation_generator,
validation_steps=nb_validation_samples // batch_size,
callbacks=[hist])
model.save('models/basic_cnn_from_scratch_model.h5') #Save the model weights #Load using: model = load_model('cnn_from_scratch_weights.h5') from keras.models import load_model
print("Time taken to train the baseline model from scratch: ",datetime.now()-global_start)
Check the following for your data:
Shuffle the training data well (I see shuffle=False everywhere)
Properly normalize all data (I see you are doing rescale=1./255, maybe okay)
Proper train/val split (you seem to be doing that too)
Suggestions for your model:
Use multiple Conv2D layers followed by a final Dense. That's what works best for image classification problems. You can also look at popular architectures that are tried and tested; e.g. AlexNet
Can change the optimizer to Adam and try with different learning rates
Have a look at your training and validation loss graphs and see if they look as expected
Also, I guess you corrected the shape of the 2nd Conv2D layer as mentioned in the comments.
It looks as if your output is always the same animal, thus you have a 20% accuracy. I highly recommend you to check your testing outputs to see if they are all the same.
Also you said that you were building a CNN but in the code snipet you posted I see only dense layers, it is going to be hard for a dense architecture to do this task, and it is very small. What is the size of your pictures?
Hope it helps!
The models seems to be working now. I have removed shuffle=False attribute. Corrected the input shape for the 2nd convolution layer. Changed the optimizer to adam. I have reached a validation accuracy of almost 94%. However, I have not yet tested the model on unseen data. There is a bit of overfitting in the model. I will have to use some aggressive dropouts to reduce them. Thanks!
Related
I have a dataset with lots of pictures and each of these pictures shows me a rectangle with a certain width. My task now is to automatically detect the width of these rectangles by image recognition, and I have trained a CNN for an image regression like in the code below.
However, this CNN gives me very bad values, i.e. mses in the range of 4,000,000 and also a very imprecise estimation of the actual widths. During my experiments I even used the training data set as test data set for the time being, but even here the CNN doesn't seem to learn anything useful.
Do you have an idea what I could be doing wrong? Is it possible that I somehow distort the images themselves while reading them in?
I'm rather new to Machine Learning, so I'm happy about every input you give me! :-)
This is the model:
def create_model():
model = Sequential()
model.add(Convolution2D(32, (3, 3), input_shape=(64, 64, 3), activation='relu'))
model.add(Flatten())
model.add(Dense(64, activation="relu"))
model.add(Dense(1))
model.compile(loss="mse", optimizer="adam")
return model
And this is the training code:
classifier = create_model()
// Getting image id and its corresponding square width
data = pd.read_csv('../data/data.csv')
id_width = data[['id', 'width']]
// Training the model
train_datagen = ImageDataGenerator()
training_set = train_datagen.flow_from_dataframe(dataframe=id_width, directory='../data/images',
x_col="id", y_col="width", has_ext=True,
class_mode="raw", target_size=(64, 64),
batch_size=32)
classifier.fit_generator(
training_set,
epochs=50,
validation_data=training_set)
"ValueError: Error when checking target: expected activation_81 to have shape (1,) but got array with shape (7,)"
I am performing a multiclass classification of 7 classes for speech emotion classification using a neural network, but it fails at this point
cnnhistory=model.fit(x_traincnn,
y_train,
batch_size=16,
epochs=700,
validation_data=(x_testcnn, y_test),
callbacks=[mcp_save, lr_reduce])
at the line callbacks=[mcp_save, lr_reduce]
mcp_save being
mcp_save = ModelCheckpoint('model/aug_noiseNshift_2class2_np.h5',
save_best_only=True, monitor='val_loss', mode='min')
and lr_reduce being
lr_reduce = ReduceLROnPlateau(monitor='val_loss', factor=0.9, patience=20, min_lr=0.000001)
Final layer of NN
Dense(7) for 7 classes
model.add(Dense(7))
model.add(Activation('softmax'))
opt = keras.optimizers.SGD(lr=0.0001, momentum=0.0, decay=0.0, nesterov=False)
compiled model using
model.compile(loss='sparse_categorical_crossentropy', optimizer=opt, metrics=['accuracy', fscore])
I have already transformed the dataset, with normalised values, changed the loss function to 'sparse_categorical_crossentropy' from 'categorical_crossentropy'. Nothing has worked just pushed the error from activation_9 to activation_18 to activation_45 to activation_54 to now activation_81. But the error is still there.
Any help would be highly appreciated!
I am new to neural networks.
TIA
If you have labels as numbers, that means y_train has shape (samples, 1) and you should use 'sparse_categorical_crossentropy'.
If you have labels as one-hot encodings, that means y_train has shape (samples, 7) and you should use 'categorical_crossentropy'.
I'm using mobilenet v2 to train a model on my images. I've frozen all but a few layers and then added additional layers for training. I'd like to be able to train from an intermediate layer rather than from the beginning. My questions:
Is it possible to provide the output of the last frozen layer as the
input for training (it would be a tensor of (?, 7,7,1280))?
How does one specify training to start from that first trainable
(non-frozen) layer? In this case, mbnetv2_conv.layer[153].
What is y_train in this case? I don't quite understand how y_train
is being used during the training process- in general, when does the
CNN refer back to y_train?
Load mobilenet v2
image_size = 224
mbnetv2_conv = MobileNetV2(weights='imagenet', include_top=False, input_shape=(image_size, image_size, 3))
# Freeze all layers except the last 3 layers
for layer in mbnetv2_conv.layers[:-3]:
layer.trainable = False
# Create the model
model = models.Sequential()
model.add(mbnetv2_conv)
model.add(layers.Flatten())
model.add(layers.Dense(16, activation='relu'))
model.add(layers.Dropout(0.5))
model.add(layers.Dense(3, activation='softmax'))
model.summary()
# Build an array (?,224,224,3) from images
x_train = np.array(all_images)
# Get layer output
from keras import backend as K
get_last_frozen_layer_output = K.function([mbnetv2_conv.layers[0].input],
[mbnetv2_conv.layers[152].output])
last_frozen_layer_output = get_last_frozen_layer_output([x_train])[0]
# Compile the model
from keras.optimizers import SGD
sgd = SGD(lr=0.01, decay=1e-6, momentum=0.9, nesterov=True)
model.compile(loss='categorical_crossentropy', optimizer=sgd, metrics=['acc'])
# how to train from a specific layer and what should y_train be?
model.fit(last_frozen_layer_output, y_train, batch_size=2, epochs=10)
Yes, you can. Two different ways.
First, the hard way makes you build two new models, one with all your frozen layers, one with all your trainable layers. Add a Flatten() layer to the frozen-layers-only model. And you will copy the weights from mobilenet v2 layer by layer to populate the weights of the frozen-layers-only model. Then you will run your input images through the frozen-layers-only model, saving the output to disk in CSV or pickle form. This is now the input for your trainable-layers model, which you train with the model.fit() command as you did above. Save the weights when you're done training. Then you will have to build the original model with both sets of layers, and load the weights into each layer, and save the whole thing. You're done!
However, the easier way is to save the weights of your model separately from the architecture with:
model.save_weights(filename)
then modify the layer.trainable property of the layers in MobileNetV2 before you add it into a new empty model:
mbnetv2_conv = MobileNetV2(weights='imagenet', include_top=False, input_shape=(image_size, image_size, 3))
for layer in mbnetv2_conv.layers[:153]:
layer.trainable = False
model = models.Sequential()
model.add(mbnetv2_conv)
then reload the weights with
newmodel.load_weights(filename)
This lets you adjust which layers in your mbnetv2_conv model you will be training on the fly, and then just call model.fit() to continue training.
I have a text dataset, that contains 6 classes. for each sample, I have the percent value and sum of the 6 percent values is 100% (features are related to each other). For example :
{A:16, B:35, C:7, D:0, E:3, F:40}
how can I feed a deep learning algorithm with this dataset?
I actually want the prediction to be exactly in the shape of training data.
Here is what you can do:
First of all, normalize all of your labels and scale them between 0-1.
Use a softmax layer for prediction.
Here is some code in Keras for intuition:
model = Sequential()
model.add(Dense(100, input_dim = x.shape[1], activation='relu'))
model.add(Dense(y.shape[1], activation='softmax'))
model.compile(loss='categorical_crossentropy', optimizer='adam')
I modified the existing activation function and using it in the Convolutional layer of the Neural Network. I would like to know how does it perform compared to the existing activation function.Is there any method/function to plot in a graph the results(matrix values) after each Neural network layer,so that I could customise my activation function according to the values for better results?
model = Sequential()
e = Embedding(vocab_size, 100, weights=[embedding_matrix], input_length=max_length, trainable=False)
model.add(e)
model.add(Conv1D(64,kernel_size,padding='valid',activation=newactivation,strides=1))
model.add(MaxPooling1D(pool_size=pool_size))
model.add(Conv1D(256,kernel_size,padding='valid',activation=newactivation,strides=1))
model.add(MaxPooling1D(pool_size=pool_size))
model.add(Bidirectional(GRU(gru_output_size, dropout=0.2, recurrent_dropout=0.2)))
model.add(Bidirectional(LSTM(lstm_output_size)))
model.add(Dense(nclass, activation='softmax'))
model.compile(optimizer='rmsprop', loss='binary_crossentropy', metrics=['accuracy'])
print(model.summary())
model.fit(padded_docs,y_train, epochs=epoch_size, verbose=0)
loss, accuracy = model.evaluate(tpadded_docs, y_test, verbose=0)
I cannot comment yet so I post this as an answer:
Refer to the Keras FAQ: "How can I obtain the output of an intermediate layer?"
It shows you how you can access the output of each layer. If you are using the version that uses the keras function, you can even access the output of the model in the learning phase (if your model contains layer that behave differently in training vs. testing).