I want to change the density of hatch lines using Matplotlib v2.2.2 and the contourf() function (specifically, I want to increase the density). I have read that you can increase the density of a hatch by increasing how many times you use the hatch figure (e.g. replace x with xx). However, that change is having no effect for me. My backend is Qt5Agg, and I'm using Python v3.6.4.
MWE:
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import numpy as np
def main():
x = np.arange( 0, 1.01, 0.01 )
X, Y = np.meshgrid( x, x )
Z = X + Y
fig, (ax1, ax2) = plt.subplots( 1, 2 )
ax1.contourf( X, Y, Z, [1,2], colors='none', hatches='x' )
ax2.contourf( X, Y, Z, [1,2], colors='none', hatches='xx' )
plt.show()
main()
which produces the output
Possible Duplicates:
This question is 7 years old and requires defining a custom class. Is this still the best option?
This question is basically exactly what I'm asking, but the MWE was a bit complicated, and didn't attract any answers.
It's in general no problem to make the hatching more dense. This is indeed done by repeating the hatching pattern. E.g. /, //, ///.
Here, you have two contour regions/levels. Hence you need two hatches.
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import numpy as np
def main():
x = np.arange( 0, 1.01, 0.01 )
X, Y = np.meshgrid( x, x )
Z = X + Y
fig, (ax1, ax2) = plt.subplots( 1, 2 )
ax1.contourf( X, Y, Z, [1,2], colors='none', hatches=['/',None] )
ax2.contourf( X, Y, Z, [1,2], colors='none', hatches=['//',None] )
plt.show()
main()
Related
I am facing a problem to plot the geometry in the python using matplotlib. I would like to have a plot which can have the equal lenth in all three axes (X, Y, Z). I have written below code but it does not show any equal axes in the obtained geometry.
How can I get the plot with equal axes?
def plotting(x, y, z, figname):
fig = plt.figure(figsize = (50,50))
ax = plt.axes(projection='3d')
ax.grid()
ax.scatter(x, y, z, c = 'r', s = 50)
ax.set_title(figname)
ax.set_xlabel('x', labelpad=20)
ax.set_ylabel('y', labelpad=20)
ax.set_zlabel('z', labelpad=20)
Matplotlib makes this very difficult. One way you could "achieve" that is by setting the same limits to xlim, ylim, zlim:
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
n = 1000
t = np.random.uniform(0, 2*np.pi, n)
p = np.random.uniform(0, 2*np.pi, n)
x = (4 + np.cos(t)) * np.cos(p)
y = (1.5 + np.cos(t)) * np.sin(p)
z = np.sin(t)
fig = plt.figure()
ax = fig.add_subplot(projection="3d")
ax.scatter(x, y, z)
ax.set_xlim(-4, 4)
ax.set_ylim(-4, 4)
ax.set_zlim(-4, 4)
plt.show()
Otherwise, your best bet is to use a different plotting library for 3D plots. Plotly allows to easily set equal aspect ratio. K3D-Jupyter and Mayavi uses equal aspect ratio by default.
I am plotting multiple lines on a single plot and I want them to run through the spectrum of a colormap, not just the same 6 or 7 colors. The code is akin to this:
for i in range(20):
for k in range(100):
y[k] = i*x[i]
plt.plot(x,y)
plt.show()
Both with colormap "jet" and another that I imported from seaborn, I get the same 7 colors repeated in the same order. I would like to be able to plot up to ~60 different lines, all with different colors.
The Matplotlib colormaps accept an argument (0..1, scalar or array) which you use to get colors from a colormap. For example:
col = pl.cm.jet([0.25,0.75])
Gives you an array with (two) RGBA colors:
array([[ 0. , 0.50392157, 1. , 1. ],
[ 1. , 0.58169935, 0. , 1. ]])
You can use that to create N different colors:
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pylab as pl
x = np.linspace(0, 2*np.pi, 64)
y = np.cos(x)
pl.figure()
pl.plot(x,y)
n = 20
colors = pl.cm.jet(np.linspace(0,1,n))
for i in range(n):
pl.plot(x, i*y, color=colors[i])
Bart's solution is nice and simple but has two shortcomings.
plt.colorbar() won't work in a nice way because the line plots aren't mappable (compared to, e.g., an image)
It can be slow for large numbers of lines due to the for loop (though this is maybe not a problem for most applications?)
These issues can be addressed by using LineCollection. However, this isn't too user-friendly in my (humble) opinion. There is an open suggestion on GitHub for adding a multicolor line plot function, similar to the plt.scatter(...) function.
Here is a working example I was able to hack together
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from matplotlib.collections import LineCollection
def multiline(xs, ys, c, ax=None, **kwargs):
"""Plot lines with different colorings
Parameters
----------
xs : iterable container of x coordinates
ys : iterable container of y coordinates
c : iterable container of numbers mapped to colormap
ax (optional): Axes to plot on.
kwargs (optional): passed to LineCollection
Notes:
len(xs) == len(ys) == len(c) is the number of line segments
len(xs[i]) == len(ys[i]) is the number of points for each line (indexed by i)
Returns
-------
lc : LineCollection instance.
"""
# find axes
ax = plt.gca() if ax is None else ax
# create LineCollection
segments = [np.column_stack([x, y]) for x, y in zip(xs, ys)]
lc = LineCollection(segments, **kwargs)
# set coloring of line segments
# Note: I get an error if I pass c as a list here... not sure why.
lc.set_array(np.asarray(c))
# add lines to axes and rescale
# Note: adding a collection doesn't autoscalee xlim/ylim
ax.add_collection(lc)
ax.autoscale()
return lc
Here is a very simple example:
xs = [[0, 1],
[0, 1, 2]]
ys = [[0, 0],
[1, 2, 1]]
c = [0, 1]
lc = multiline(xs, ys, c, cmap='bwr', lw=2)
Produces:
And something a little more sophisticated:
n_lines = 30
x = np.arange(100)
yint = np.arange(0, n_lines*10, 10)
ys = np.array([x + b for b in yint])
xs = np.array([x for i in range(n_lines)]) # could also use np.tile
colors = np.arange(n_lines)
fig, ax = plt.subplots()
lc = multiline(xs, ys, yint, cmap='bwr', lw=2)
axcb = fig.colorbar(lc)
axcb.set_label('Y-intercept')
ax.set_title('Line Collection with mapped colors')
Produces:
Hope this helps!
An anternative to Bart's answer, in which you do not specify the color in each call to plt.plot is to define a new color cycle with set_prop_cycle. His example can be translated into the following code (I've also changed the import of matplotlib to the recommended style):
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
x = np.linspace(0, 2*np.pi, 64)
y = np.cos(x)
n = 20
ax = plt.axes()
ax.set_prop_cycle('color',[plt.cm.jet(i) for i in np.linspace(0, 1, n)])
for i in range(n):
plt.plot(x, i*y)
If you are using continuous color pallets like brg, hsv, jet or the default one then you can do like this:
color = plt.cm.hsv(r) # r is 0 to 1 inclusive
Now you can pass this color value to any API you want like this:
line = matplotlib.lines.Line2D(xdata, ydata, color=color)
This approach seems to me like the most concise, user-friendly and does not require a loop to be used. It does not rely on user-made functions either.
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
# make 5 lines
n_lines = 5
x = np.arange(0, 2).reshape(-1, 1)
A = np.linspace(0, 2, n_lines).reshape(1, -1)
Y = x # A
# create colormap
cm = plt.cm.bwr(np.linspace(0, 1, n_lines))
# plot
ax = plt.subplot(111)
ax.set_prop_cycle('color', list(cm))
ax.plot(x, Y)
plt.show()
Resulting figure here
The figure above is a great artwork showing the wind speed, wind direction and temperature simultaneously. detailedly:
The X axes represent the date
The Y axes shows the wind direction(Southern, western, etc)
The variant widths of the line were stand for the wind speed through timeseries
The variant colors of the line were stand for the atmospheric temperature
This simple figure visualized 3 different attribute without redundancy.
So, I really want to reproduce similar plot in matplotlib.
My attempt now
## Reference 1 http://stackoverflow.com/questions/19390895/matplotlib-plot-with-variable-line-width
## Reference 2 http://stackoverflow.com/questions/17240694/python-how-to-plot-one-line-in-different-colors
def plot_colourline(x,y,c):
c = plt.cm.jet((c-np.min(c))/(np.max(c)-np.min(c)))
lwidths=1+x[:-1]
ax = plt.gca()
for i in np.arange(len(x)-1):
ax.plot([x[i],x[i+1]], [y[i],y[i+1]], c=c[i],linewidth = lwidths[i])# = lwidths[i])
return
x=np.linspace(0,4*math.pi,100)
y=np.cos(x)
lwidths=1+x[:-1]
fig = plt.figure(1, figsize=(5,5))
ax = fig.add_subplot(111)
plot_colourline(x,y,prop)
ax.set_xlim(0,4*math.pi)
ax.set_ylim(-1.1,1.1)
Does someone has a more interested way to achieve this? Any advice would be appreciate!
Using as inspiration another question.
One option would be to use fill_between. But perhaps not in the way it was intended. Instead of using it to create your line, use it to mask everything that is not the line. Under it you can have a pcolormesh or contourf (for example) to map color any way you want.
Look, for instance, at this example:
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import numpy as np
from scipy.interpolate import interp1d
def windline(x,y,deviation,color):
y1 = y-deviation/2
y2 = y+deviation/2
tol = (y2.max()-y1.min())*0.05
X, Y = np.meshgrid(np.linspace(x.min(), x.max(), 100), np.linspace(y1.min()-tol, y2.max()+tol, 100))
Z = X.copy()
for i in range(Z.shape[0]):
Z[i,:] = c
#plt.pcolormesh(X, Y, Z)
plt.contourf(X, Y, Z, cmap='seismic')
plt.fill_between(x, y2, y2=np.ones(x.shape)*(y2.max()+tol), color='w')
plt.fill_between(x, np.ones(x.shape) * (y1.min() - tol), y2=y1, color='w')
plt.xlim(x.min(), x.max())
plt.ylim(y1.min()-tol, y2.max()+tol)
plt.show()
x = np.arange(100)
yo = np.random.randint(20, 60, 21)
y = interp1d(np.arange(0, 101, 5), yo, kind='cubic')(x)
dv = np.random.randint(2, 10, 21)
d = interp1d(np.arange(0, 101, 5), dv, kind='cubic')(x)
co = np.random.randint(20, 60, 21)
c = interp1d(np.arange(0, 101, 5), co, kind='cubic')(x)
windline(x, y, d, c)
, which results in this:
The function windline accepts as arguments numpy arrays with x, y , a deviation (like a thickness value per x value), and color array for color mapping. I think it can be greatly improved by messing around with other details but the principle, although not perfect, should be solid.
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from matplotlib.collections import LineCollection
x = np.linspace(0,4*np.pi,10000) # x data
y = np.cos(x) # y data
r = np.piecewise(x, [x < 2*np.pi, x >= 2*np.pi], [lambda x: 1-x/(2*np.pi), 0]) # red
g = np.piecewise(x, [x < 2*np.pi, x >= 2*np.pi], [lambda x: x/(2*np.pi), lambda x: -x/(2*np.pi)+2]) # green
b = np.piecewise(x, [x < 2*np.pi, x >= 2*np.pi], [0, lambda x: x/(2*np.pi)-1]) # blue
a = np.ones(10000) # alpha
w = x # width
fig, ax = plt.subplots(2)
ax[0].plot(x, r, color='r')
ax[0].plot(x, g, color='g')
ax[0].plot(x, b, color='b')
# mysterious parts
points = np.array([x, y]).T.reshape(-1, 1, 2)
segments = np.concatenate([points[:-1], points[1:]], axis=1)
# mysterious parts
rgba = list(zip(r,g,b,a))
lc = LineCollection(segments, linewidths=w, colors=rgba)
ax[1].add_collection(lc)
ax[1].set_xlim(0,4*np.pi)
ax[1].set_ylim(-1.1,1.1)
fig.show()
I notice this is what I suffered.
I have three variables:
gamma= [0.001, 0.0001]
c= [1, 10, 100, 1000]
f = [9.350473612990527483e-01, 8.848238482384823689e-01, 9.769335142469470767e-01, 8.534599728629578275e-01, 9.198369565217391353e-01, 8.953804347826085364e-01, 9.713506139154161056e-01, 9.836065573770491621e-01]
My question is how can I draw a surface plot using the above variables?
Ok, here is the solution using your gamma, c and f values although the surface looks a bit strange but that's due to your data. Please check the order of data. I assumed it to be np.meshgrid(gamma, c) but it could very well be np.meshgrid(c, gamma). You need to verify that
from mpl_toolkits.mplot3d import Axes3D
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import numpy as np
fig = plt.figure(figsize=(8, 6))
ax = fig.add_subplot(111, projection='3d')
gamma= np.array([0.001, 0.0001])
c= np.array([1, 10, 100, 1000])
X, Y = np.meshgrid(gamma, c)
f = np.array([9.350473612990527483e-01, 8.848238482384823689e-01, 9.769335142469470767e-01, 8.534599728629578275e-01, 9.198369565217391353e-01, 8.953804347826085364e-01, 9.713506139154161056e-01, 9.836065573770491621e-01])
Z = f.reshape(X.shape)
ax.plot_surface(X, Y, Z)
Output
I'm currently trying to get an impression of continuous change in my contour plot. I have to use a logscale for the values, because some of them are some orders of magnitude bigger than the others.
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from matplotlib import ticker
K = np.linspace(-0.99, 5, 100)
x = np.linspace(1, 5, 100)
K, x = np.meshgrid(K, x)
static_diff = 1 / (1 + K)
fig = plt.figure()
plot = plt.contourf(K, x, static_diff, locator=ticker.LogLocator(numticks=300))
plt.grid(True)
plt.xlabel('K')
plt.ylabel('x')
plt.xlim([-0.99, 5])
plt.ylim([1, 5])
fig.colorbar(plot)
plt.show()
Despite the number of ticks given to be 300 it returns a plot like:
Is there a way to get more of these lines? I also tried adding the number of parameters as the fourth parameter of the plt.contourf function.
To specify the levels of a contourf plot you may
use the levels argument and supply a list of values for the levels. E.g for 20 levels,
plot = plt.contourf(K, x, static_diff, levels=np.logspace(-2, 3, 20))
use the locator argument to which you would supply a matplotlib ticker
plt.contourf(K, x, static_diff, locator=ticker.LogLocator(subs=range(1,10)))
Note however that the LogLocator does not use a numticks argument but instead a base and a subs argument to determine the locations of the ticks. See documentation.
Complete example for the latter case, which also uses a LogNormto distribute the colors better in logspace:
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from matplotlib import ticker
import matplotlib.colors
K = np.linspace(-0.99, 5, 100)
x = np.linspace(1, 5, 100)
K, x = np.meshgrid(K, x)
static_diff = 1 / (1 + K)
fig = plt.figure()
norm= matplotlib.colors.LogNorm(vmin=static_diff.min(), vmax=static_diff.max())
plot = plt.contourf(K, x, static_diff, locator=ticker.LogLocator(subs=range(1,10)), norm=norm)
#plot = plt.contourf(K, x, static_diff, levels=np.logspace(-2, 3, 20), norm=norm)
plt.grid(True)
plt.xlabel('K')
plt.ylabel('x')
plt.xlim([-0.99, 5])
plt.ylim([1, 5])
fig.colorbar(plot)
plt.show()