My issue: For my thesis I am creating an auction site. I have an admin panel in which I would like to have some configurations so that an admin can specify that if there are 10 days before the end of an auction some components should be displayed in different ways, some should be not visible at all etc. That’s what I call dynamic presentation.
My question: Right now I am working on architecture and wondering if SSR can be helpful in any way? I am already aware that it can shorten download time of some collections from my database even by half, but I am wondering if there is any way how it can be helpful with dynamic presentation itself?
What I already know: I have read all about advantages and disadvantages of ssr or universal rendering in react. Now I am only wondering if it can be in any way helpful with dynamic presentation or it won't matter if I choose SSR or CSR.
Small side question: I don’t have the whole architecture ready yet. What I know is that I would like to have a database, one separate app for an admin, backend and frontend (either ssr or csr). My first thought on how to manage this dynamic presentation was to store some rules in the database. Then the rules could be configured in admin app should an admin want to change anything. The rules should be send to backend and calculated with some additional data from frontend. Then backend could send some flag to frontend indicating which components to display etc. In theory I could move calculating to e.g. NodeJs server should I go with SSR. What I'm wondering about is; can you think of any better way to handle dynamic presentation? What I am most afraid of is numerous ifs in the fronetend. I would like to have some more elegant solution but I have no other idea so far. For some time I thought about a scoring system but I believe it would be too complicated (instead of sending a flag, send a score and frontend will display correct things based on the score). Also it wouldn’t solve the issue of ifs on the frontend.
I am aware that on StackOverflow questions which can be answered rather than discussed are preferred but I am really stuck and would appreciate help.
Basically SSR can provide some speed on your page because all of your data will not be trying to be fetched when the react script will end with an API call. Data are fetched from database when page is requested and be passed to the component to render with the script.
Also another very basic advantage and the reason why everyone are going the SSR way is SEO. You cannot achieve SEO page with react CSR. This is because google bot etc will try and crawl your page without even render it. Is like trying to "view source" of a page. When you are in CSR the page has no content only the initial react divs empty. You need SSR to have data on the first request of the user.
SSR brings the data on the first request of the user until a reload. In the meantime react router fetches data from the api.
Let me know if that help you.
PS: also a helpful link https://medium.com/walmartlabs/the-benefits-of-server-side-rendering-over-client-side-rendering-5d07ff2cefe8
Related
I'm relatively new to webdev, and essentially I'm trying to create functionality that allows users to create their own event pages (similar to Facebook Events, Meetup etc.).
My question is to do with the surrounding architecture of this, namely:
Given each event page will have its own url, do you need a separate file for each event in the backend?
Or is there some clever way of templating and directing traffic? (Sorry if this is vague, I'm trying to probe if there is a better way of doing this?)
I notice that most of the FB/Meetup events all have their own URLs, does this mean that they all have separate files in the backend?
I'm using Nodejs for the backend btw.
I've been Googling around but haven't been able to figure it out, I think I might be using the wrong wording... so even a point in the direction of the right wording would be much appreciated!
Thanks y'all
Generally this is handled via database-driven solutions. The "pages" are dynamic, and the URL is a parameter see #Konrad's comment that allows the pages to be looked up in a database which allows the dynamic content to be loaded into a single page which handles the complexity of each page seeming unique.
I’m new to React, and I have trouble with finding best solution for my app.
My current (Node.js+Express+Handlebars) app has one main menu with place where I render HTML received from AJAX request made after click on menu element. Then all actions inside this element are done by proper JS script. I wanted to improve it by using React, but I have problem with permissions management.
Currently, after authentication, handlebars receive list of files which user should load and render it as src in element. If user has access to only 5 of 20 modules, he can access only proper JS files. Also, he can’t access HTML he don’t has access to.
How to manage it in React? I want to have one interface for all users, but I don’t want to store logic for all components accessible for every user. I was thinking about something like AJAX loading components for React, but how to manage it?
Is it even possible? As I understand (maybe wrong), all React components are compiled from separated JSX files to one main.js, so is it possible to add separate files with other components?
I believe that the issue that you have encountered is a crucial step on the long stairway of making something great. The solution to your problem is the balance of all the present factors and consolidation of them to cooperate on a mutually beneficial basis. I hope that solves your problem
What I would like to know is, how do you built your web application? I'm really confuse as which method should I use for my project.
Already decided which technologies to choose.
1) Node.js and express as its Framework
2) MongoDB
3) React + Flux
But the problem right now, should I use method (A) or method (B)
Method (A) - Serverside rendering for HTML
app.get('/users/', function(request, respond) {
var user = "Jack";
respond.render("user", { user: user });
});
Method (B) - Clientside rendering for HTML
app.get('/users/', function(request, respond){
var user = "Jack";
respond.json({ user: user });
});
Method A will render the HTML from the server and as well as the data.
Method B will just respond the data that is needed for the client which is React.js, so that it could manipulate the data.
My concern, is which method should I use? most startups use which method?
Thank you.
It's not an either/or proposition.
React is a client side framework. You have to render on the client side. The question is whether to render on the server side in addition to rendering on the client side.
The answer? If you can, YES!
You will get SEO benefits and an initial performance boost by rendering on the server side. But you will still have to do the same client side rendering.
I suggestion googling "isomorphic react" and doing some reading. Here is one article on the subject.
http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2015/04/react-to-the-future-with-isomorphic-apps/
Well, it really depends on which vision you have on the modern web, and what you are willing to do.
Will you prefer to let your users wait, displaying a loader while data are loaded asynchronously, or will you prefer to keep your users busy as long as you can ?
Here are different articles that will help you clear your mind and be aware of the different advantages that you can have by doing server-side rendering, client-side rendering having multiple issues.
You can see this post from Twitter blog saying they improve their initial page load by 1/5th to what they had before, by moving the rendering to the server:
https://blog.twitter.com/2012/improving-performance-on-twittercom
An other article, this time from airbnb, describing the issues you can have with client-side rendering itself:
http://nerds.airbnb.com/isomorphic-javascript-future-web-apps/
There is also an other interesting article talking about client-side/server-side rendering, bringing a debate on when should we use / not use server-side or client-side rendering and why:
https://ponyfoo.com/articles/stop-breaking-the-web
And to finish, I can give you two more link more focused on react, and describing in which way server-side rendering should be helpful for your case:
https://www.terlici.com/2015/03/18/fast-react-loading-server-rendering.html
http://reactjsnews.com/isomorphic-javascript-with-react-node/
Now, about what you SHOULD do, it's a matter of what you exactly need to do, to my opinion, but basically, you can do both at the same time (client-side AND server-side), to have the best user experience.
This concept is called "isomorphic javascript" and it is getting more and more popular these days.
The simplest architecture is to just do dynamic html rendering on the server, with no Ajax, and with a new HTML page requested for pretty much any client click. This is the 'traditional' approach, and has pros and cons.
The next simplest is to serve completely static html+js+css (your React app) to the client, and make XMLHttpRequest calls to webservices to fetch the required data (i.e. your method B).
The most complex but ideal approach (from a performance and SEO perspective) is to build an 'isomorphic' app that supports both approaches. The idea is that the server makes all the necessary WS calls that the client would make and renders the initial page that the user has visited (which could be a deep-linked part of the application), a bit like option A but using React to do the rendering, and then passes control to the client for future DOM updates. This then allows fast incremental updates to the page via web-service calls as the user interacts (e.g. just like B). Navigation between different 'pages' at this point involves using the History API to make it look like you're changing page, when actually you are just manipulating the current page using web-services. But you you then did a browser refresh, your server would send back the full HTML of the current page, before passing control to client-side React again. There are lots of React+Flux+Node examples of this approach available online, using the different flavours of Flux that support server-side rendering.
Whether that approach is worthwhile depends on your situation. It probably makes sense to start using approach B (you can share the your HTTP API between mobile apps and websites), but use a Flux architecture that supports server-side rendering and keep it in mind. That way, if you need to improve the performance of initial page loads, you have the means to do it.
I've been using ember, node, express since 2 months ago.
I've developed an small app, now it's time to add user auth to it but I can't figure out how to do this.
There are a few questions I have:
1.- In SPA apps, where there's only index.html, I include all .js ember files. So, the user could be able to see all the app logic without auth?. How can I add the libs only when the user has been auth?
2.- What's the right way to auth in ember? I haven't seen a solution in official documentation.
3.- How the frontend communicates with the backend, what's the logic here? It's in every route?
Also I'm looking for an example or tutorial.
Thanks you!
I believe these videos target exactly your question
http://www.embercasts.com/episodes/client-side-authentication-part-1
http://www.embercasts.com/episodes/client-side-authentication-part-2
just to mention a great resource for ember tutorials http://emberwatch.com/ - it contains screencasts, books, talks.. articles - all you need to get started.
There is nothing bad about "seeing logic", you are protecting data, not code. Still, if you really want to protect your code, you can create a separate login page and require authentication for every other resource (app html, styles, scripts, etc.). But protecting EVERY resource of your app means that you can't delegate handling static files to nginx or cdn or whatnot. So, think carefully.
There are to approaches: embedded authentication and separate login page. For the first one you can use https://github.com/Vestorly/torii or https://github.com/simplabs/ember-simple-auth. If you decide to go with the second, you can just use authentication provided by your backend (passport.js, etc) and redirect to login page on failures.
Nothing special, you just write your model methods and handle possible authorisation errors. You might also want to have a user object around to use in your template and route logic.
I'm developing a very dynamic web application via ember.js. The client-side communicates with a server-side JSON API. A user can make various choices and see diced & filtered data from all kinds of perspectives, where all of this data is brought from said API.
Thing is, I also need to generate static pages (that Google can understand) from the same data. These static pages represent pre-defined views and don't allow much interaction; they are meant to serve as landing pages for users arriving from search engines.
Naturally, I'd like to reuse as much as I can from my dynamic web application to generate these static pages, so the natural direction I thought of going for is implementing a server-side module to render these pages which would reuse as much as possible of my Ember.js views & code.
However - I can't find any material on that. Ember's docs say "Although it is possible to use Ember.js on the server side, that is beyond the scope of this guide."
Can anyone point out what would be possible to reuse on the server-end, and best practices for designing the app in a way to enable maximal such reuse?
Of course, if you think my thinking here doesn't make sense, I'd be glad to hear this (and why) too :-)
Thanks!
C.
Handlebars - Ember's templating engine - does run on the server (at least under Node.js). I've used it in my own projects.
When serving an HTTP request for a page, you could quite possibly use your existing templates: pull the relevant data from the DB, massage it into a JSON object, feed it to handlebars along with the right template, then send the result to the client.
Have a look at http://phantomjs.org/
You could use it to render the pages on the server and return a plain html version.
You have to make it follow googles ajax crawling guides: https://developers.google.com/webmasters/ajax-crawling/docs/getting-started