This is my code:
let paragraph = paragraphs.items[paragraphs.items.length - 1];
let p = paragraph.insertParagraph('', window.Word.InsertLocation.after);
if (paragraph.isListItem) {
p.detachFromList()
p.leftIndent = 0
}
It works nicely, thanks to the help from MS people watching SO issues.
However, that works on the desktop version of Word. The online version of Word does not end the bullet list when using some templates so the new content (p) is added as a part of the list. No error is thrown.
I've tried playing around with paragraph.insertBreak('line') at a few places, but I'm unsure what would be the best thing to do here in order to keep the same user experience across platforms.
Any way I can do this so it works the same both on the desktop and on the online version of Word? Tested in Chrome, used the template General Notes for testing bullet lists. Works fine online if bullet list is generated by user, through the Home menu, but General Notes doesn't work.
i just tried the exact same code i sent you in word online, and it also works, so you should be fine...
try to apply this after you insert your paragraph at the end.
Word.run(function (context) {
var listI = context.document.body.paragraphs.getLast().listItemOrNullObject;
context.load(listI);
return context.sync()
.then(function () {
if (listI.isNullObject) { // check out how i am validating if its null.
console.log("there is no list at the end")
}
else {
context.document.body.paragraphs.getLast().detachFromList();
context.document.body.paragraphs.getLast().leftIndent = 0;
return context.sync();
}
})
})
Related
I am implementing azure search in my application to provide autosuggestion feature like google, big, and amazon. I have implemented the same available github code using below URL.All is working fine but getting result in more than 1.5 second for each term of sentence.
https://github.com/Azure-Samples/search-dotnet-getting-started/tree/master/DotNetHowToAutocomplete
Currently I am using two indexes for searching and created in basic tier. Below is code
public ActionResult Suggest(bool highlights, bool fuzzy, string term)
{
InitSearch();
// Call suggest API and return results
SuggestParameters sp = new SuggestParameters()
{
UseFuzzyMatching = fuzzy,
Top = 5,
Filter="name eq 'testid'",
OrderBy=new List<string>() { "Date desc"}
};
if (highlights)
{
sp.HighlightPreTag = "<b>";
sp.HighlightPostTag = "</b>";
}
DocumentSuggestResult suggestResult = _indexClient1.Documents.Suggest(term, "index1",sp);
if (suggestResult.Results.Count<5)
{
SuggestParameters sp2 = new SuggestParameters()
{
UseFuzzyMatching = fuzzy,
Top = 5- suggestResult.Results.Count,
Filter = "Product eq 'PAAS'",
OrderBy = new List<string>() { "Count desc" }
};
if (highlights)
{
sp2.HighlightPreTag = "<b>";
sp2.HighlightPostTag = "</b>";
}
DocumentSuggestResult suggestResult2= _indexClient2.Documents.Suggest(term, "index2", sp2);
suggestResult.Results = suggestResult.Results.Union(suggestResult2.Results).Distinct().ToList();
// final = suggestResult.Results.GroupBy(s => s.Text, StringComparer.CurrentCultureIgnoreCase).ToList();
}
// Convert the suggest query results to a list that can be displayed in the client.
List<string> suggestions = suggestResult.Results.Select(x => x.Text).Distinct().ToList();
return new JsonResult
{
JsonRequestBehavior = JsonRequestBehavior.AllowGet,
Data = suggestions
};
}
To test it- when I am typing any word it's taking too much time in populating results around 1.5 to 1.8 seconds, it's working like other web app searchbox.
Timing I am checking using inspect element of chrome browser. Attaching sreenshot.see screenshot
Please suggest.
I answered a similar question on another post: Why is Azure Search taking 1400 miliiseconds to return query results for simple query
The main thing is, you shouldn't be using the Chrome timer to measure the performance of azure search. Use the "elapsed-time" field of the HTTP response you receive (take an average over multiple call), since it accurately tells you how much time was spent getting your results from azure search. The chrome timer can be affected by your network/machine configuration. If that doesn't help, you can follow the other tips I suggested in the post I linked above.
I've been attempting to do some web scraping using puppeteer, and I've run into the following problem: I want to click an element that has a specific inner text (in this case 'INHERITANCE TAX RETURN'), but everything else about the element seems to be identical to a lot of other elements on the page. I was wondering if anyone knew a way to search for an element based on its inner text. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Have you tried:
const linkHandlers = await page.$x("//span[contains(text(), 'INHERITANCE TAX RETURN')]");
if (linkHandlers.length > 0) {
await linkHandlers[0].click();
} else {
throw new Error("Link not found");
}
I'm using loopback 3.
I have this lines of codes in my model's js (survey.js):
let enabledRemoteMethods = []
Survey.sharedClass.methods().forEach(function(method) {
console.log(method.name, method.isStatic)
let matchingEnabledRemoteMethod = _.find(enabledRemoteMethods, {name: method.name});
if (!matchingEnabledRemoteMethod) {
Survey.disableRemoteMethodByName(method.name, method.isStatic);
}
});
It works.... almost. I could still see in the explorer the REST endpoint for "PATCH /surveys/{id}". My expectation is: there shouldn't be any REST endpoints listed in the explorer.
Then I examined the URL corresponding to that operation, it is:
http://localhost:3000/explorer/#!/Survey/Survey_prototype_patchAttributes
Which, according to the documentation, means that patchAttributes is a static method.
Then I cross checked with the output in the console... there it says: pathAttributes is not static.
Incosistency!
I even have tried adding this line:
Survey.disableRemoteMethodByName("patchAttributes", true);
Also
Survey.disableRemoteMethodByName("patchAttributes", false);
No luck.
Can someone confirm if it's a bug in loopback 3 (I don't know about loopback 2, haven't checked)? If it's a bug I wouldn't have to spend time on it and just wait until it gets fixed. But if it's not a bug, can someone point out what's missing in my code?
Thanks!
UPDATE: figured out how
With this line I'm able to get rid of it:
Survey.disableRemoteMethodByName("prototype.patchAttributes", true);
The second parameter doesn't seem to matter (you can put false as well). Not sure why though (I suppose it should've accepted true only).
This is my current solution:
let disabledPrototypesRemoteMethods = ['patchAttributes']
let enabledRemoteMethods = [
"create", "findById", "replaceById", "deleteById",
"replaceOrCreateQuestion"
]
Survey.sharedClass.methods().forEach(function(method) {
if (enabledRemoteMethods.indexOf(method.name) == -1) {
Survey.disableRemoteMethodByName(method.name);
}
if (disabledPrototypesRemoteMethods.indexOf(method.name) > -1) {
Survey.disableRemoteMethodByName("prototype." + method.name);
}
});
Still, one small detail: this thing still shows up (I suppose it provides the POST alternative for the normal PUT for the replaceById operation..., but I don't want it; I want to force user of my API to go with the PUT only):
http://localhost:3000/explorer/#!/Survey/Survey_replaceById_post_surveys_id_replace
I tried adding this line:
Survey.disableRemoteMethodByName("replaceById_post_surveys_id_replace");
No luck.
Anyway... hope this useful for others; loopback doc is kind of sketchy.
You can get the prototype methods as well by looking at the stringName property. That way you can include the prototypes in your list.
The stringName includes the sharedClass name in the value, so you will need to parse that out.
module.exports = BusinessProfileContacted => {
const enabledRemoteMethods = ["create", "findById", "replaceById", "deleteById", "replaceOrCreateQuestion", "prototype.replaceAttributes"];
Survey.sharedClass.methods().forEach(method => {
const methodName = method.stringName.replace(/.*?(?=\.)/, '').substr(1);
if (enabledRemoteMethods.indexOf(methodName) === -1) {
Survey.disableRemoteMethodByName(methodName);
}
});
};
We've been using the /venues/suggestcompletion endpoint for a while for our autocompletion feature for a while now.
It started returning empty arrays for all our queries recently.
Here is a sample set of GET parameters:
{
limit = 20;
ll = "52.485799,13.437771";
query = ostba;
}
resulting in this URL:
https://api.foursquare.com/v2/venues/suggestcompletion?client_id=OUR_CLIENT_ID&client_secret=OUR_CLIENT_SECRET&v=20120801&query=ostba&ll=52.485799,13.437771
and corresponding output:
meta = {
code = 200;
};
response = {
minivenues = (
);
};
I know /venues/suggestcompletion is meant as experimental but I couldn't find a notice of an API change. This is breaking the venue search functionality for our app in production. We'd appreciate any pointers.
Thanks a lot…
This was a temporary bug that was introduced yesterday. We believe we've fixed the problem -- sorry for that!
I'm using a service called Embedly to style my RSS feeds from Google Feedburner. I have an example code over her: JsFiddle
If you look closely you will see the source (CNN) at the end of every title. This is called .provider I would like to get rid of the whole div (.embed) IF the the word CNN is located elsewere (meaning duplicate) in the div, either .description or a
I tried many things, this is one of them really straight forward code:
$('.embed').each(function() {
if($('.embed a:first **could also be .description**', this).text() == $('.provider', this).text())
$(this).remove();
});
I cant figure out why its not working. I also used it with on and live click with no luck.
I just realized the 'embeds' are not there on document tready. I added a button with click event which you can click after the embedly has loaded in: http://jsfiddle.net/2VBSX/37/
You can use success event to filter provider class from the data like this :
EDITED
$('div.newscontainer').embedly({
key: ':3eccf441bf0f43acbb076da9817af27d',
success: function(oembed, dict) {
output = $(oembed['code']);
description = $(oembed['code']).find(".description").text();
var regex =new RegExp(output.find('.provider').text(),"i");
if(regex.exec(description) == null ) {
$(dict["node"]).parent().html(output);
}
output.find("a:eq(0)").text(); // First
output.find("a:eq(1)").text(); // Provider
}
});
Checkout this jsfiddle demo
Is it that what you want?
var regex = /CNN/;
$('.embed').each(function(index, element) {
if (regex.exec($('.embed a:first').text()) != null
&& regex.exec($('.provider').text()) != null) {
element.remove();
}
});