Horizontal align text below flex-items - flexbox

Image captions are aligned bottom by flexbox within a gallery where images have different heights. How can I achieve that first lines of text (titles) are aligned horizontally?
<style type="text/css">
* {
box-sizing: border-box; }
.flex-container {
display: flex;
flex-wrap: wrap; }
.flex-item {
width: 50%;
padding: 20px;
display: flex;
flex-direction: column; }
.flex-item img {
width: 100%;
height: auto; }
.flex-image {
flex: 1 0 auto; }
</style>
<div class="flex-container">
<div class="flex-item">
<div class="flex-image">
<img src="img-1.jpg" alt="" />
</div>
<p>title</p>
</div>
<div class="flex-item">
<div class="flex-image">
<img src="img-2.jpg" alt="" />
</div>
<p>title<br>Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet.</p>
</div>
</div>
Please check my codepen: https://codepen.io/tinusmile/pen/MoeORG
Many thanks!

With the existing markup, where the images can have different heights, you need to do something like this, where you give the p a height.
As an element's overflow defaults to visible, it will flow out of its boundaries, so I recommend to set the height so it can accommodate 2-3 lines of text.
On smaller screens you might need to add a #media query to adjust that height, as if the text is very long it might overflow any element below itself.
.flex-item p {
height: 50px; }
Updated codepen
Note, using min-height instead would solve the might overflow any element below itself issue, though it will make the first line to not align horizontally if the value does not accommodate all the possible amount of lines.
Another option is to remove the flex-item wrapper and use Flexbox's order property, as I suggested in a previous question of yours, align-horizontally-3-elements-over-3-divs

Related

How to get text in a CSS grid nested in a flexbox to wrap first?

TL;DR: Here's a CodePen.
I have a UI with an image and a grid of text with long lines which looks like this:
I'm using CSS Flexbox with two elements: the image and the text. And then to lay out the text, I'm using CSS Grid. Now, when I view this on a narrow screen for mobile, it correctly wraps everything and stacks the two elements:
But on desktop, with a slightly narrower div, the flex box wraps before the grid text like this:
How can I get the text to wrap while leaving the flex box alone in this case? I fear I may need to use some media queries, but I'm not even sure if I'm using the right CSS components for this.
Here's the code:
index.html:
<div class="media-callout">
<div class="media-thumb">
<img height="170" width="120">
</div>
<div class="media-callout-grid">
<div class="media-callout-key">Authors</div>
<div>Babalola, J & Ogunkola, Babalola</div>
<div class="media-callout-key">Year</div>
<div>2013</div>
<div class="media-callout-key">Title</div>
<div class="media-callout-value">Scientific Literacy: Conceptual Overview, Importance and Strategies for Improvement</div>
<div class="media-callout-key">Journal</div>
<div><em>Journal of Educational and Social Research</em></div>
<div class="media-callout-key">Location</div>
<div>vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 265–274</div>
<div class="media-callout-key">DOI</div>
<div>10.5901/jesr.2013.v3n1p265</div>
</div>
</div>
style.css:
.media-callout {
display: flex;
flex-wrap: wrap;
justify-content: center;
row-gap: 20px;
column-gap: 10px;
padding: 1em;
max-width: max-content;
}
.media-thumb img {
float: left;
height: 175px;
width: auto;
}
.media-callout-grid {
display: grid;
font-size: 12pt;
grid-template-columns: 6em 1fr;
align-content: center;
gap: 0 15px;
}
.media-callout-key {
text-align: right;
font-weight: bold;
}
.media-callout-value {
word-break: break-word;
word-wrap: break-all;
}
A media query does indeed resolve this:
#media screen and (min-width: 600px) {
.media-callout {
flex-wrap: nowrap;
}
}
The query must come AFTER the .media-callout block. I also had to use this approach to prevent the image from being squashed.

Flexbox gap workaround for Safari

I finished my website but I didn't realize that safari doesn't support the flexbox gap. Is there a way around this without having the mess anything up? This is mostly for my media queries.
<div class="social-media">
<a href="https://github.com/">
<img class="social-media__icon" src="img/github.png" alt="Github">
</a>
<a href="https://www.linkedin.com/">
<img class="social-media__icon" src="img/linkedin.png" alt="LinkedIn">
</a>
</div>
.social-media {
display: -webkit-box;
display: -ms-flexbox;
display: flex;
-webkit-box-pack: center;
-ms-flex-pack: center;
justify-content: center;
gap: 8rem;
margin-top: 10rem;
padding-bottom: 2rem;
}
.social-media img {
width: 90px;
height: 90px;
}
#media only screen and (max-width: 400px) {
.social-media {
gap: 3rem;
margin-top: 5rem;
}
.social-media img {
width: 62px;
height: 62px;
}
}
Use the Lobotomized owl selector: .parent > * + * {} to add a margin-left that gives you space between the elements that come after another element, this way you eliminate the undesired margin it creates when you put the margin directly to the child's first element (.social-media img{})
.social-media > * + * { margin-left: 8rem;}
Here you can read more about the Lobotomized Owl Selector
Edit: Gap is now supported in safari so you should be able to use it no problem.
Property gap with display: flex is not supported by Safar version < 14 https://caniuse.com/flexbox-gap .
You might want to replace display flex with grid:
display: grid;
grid-gap: 8rem; /* Safari 10-11 */
gap: 8rem; /* Safari 12+ */
because grid's gap is supported in older Safari versions: https://caniuse.com/mdn-css_properties_gap_grid_context
The accepted answer has the problem, that you will have a wrong margin on the first element if when there is only one row. Also centered elements will always be 8rem too far the right.
Better solution that will always work with correct spacings:
.container {
display: flex;
// the trick is to set margins around boxes, but correct the margins around elements that are situated at the border of the container with negative margins
margin: 0 -10px -20px -10px;
}
.box {
min-width: 100px;
height: 100px;
background-color: deeppink;
margin: 0 10px 20px 10px;
}
<div class='container'>
<div class='box'>1</div>
<div class='box'>2</div>
<div class='box'>3</div>
<div class='box'>4</div>
</div>
You can remove the gap class and add another one to child elements
<div class="d-flex"> // it was "d-flex gap" previously
<div class="mx-2">
//content
</div>
<div class="mx-2">
//content
</div>
</div>
I think you could make a div container and put justify-content: space-between; then i think it should work

Vertical align a button in an absolute positioned div

Usually I vertically center a button, inside an absolute positioned div with top:50%, and margin-left:-(height/2), but today I realised it's not perfect, or I don't know how to use it correctly.
For example I did 2 examples. In the first example the <a> tag is an inline element, in the second example it's a block element. The positioning with block element is perfect, but unfortunately the width is 100%.
Please explain that why is the second example works well, with display:block;?
I'm really interested in your cross browser solution. How do you do this simple stuff?
Here is my css:
.container {
height:240px;
position:relative;
}
.box {
width:200px;
height:100%;
position:absolute;
left:0;
top:0;
background:yellow;
text-align:center;
padding:20px;
}
#example2 { left: 250px; }
.btn {
display:inline-block;
padding:5px 12px;
line-height:34px;
color:#fff;
background:red;
position:relative;
top:50%;
margin-top:-17px;
}
#example2 .btn { display:block; }
..and html
<div class="container">
<div id="example1" class="box">
button
</div>
<div id="example2" class="box">
button
</div>
</div>
The online version is available at http://jsfiddle.net/79hqgabq/2/
The alignment issue you see is being caused by the margin-top: -17px line as seen by this updated fiddle with that line removed on the .btn class: Updated Demo
On another note, vertical alignment is notoriously problematic with old CSS selectors, and it would be a good idea to transition over to Flexbox unless you needed to support older browsers.
Here's your problem with the new display: flex selector and corresponding sub-selectors: Demo w/ Flexbox. This removes the emphasis on having to pixel fudge to get proper vertical alignment.
New .box class
.box {
width:200px;
height:100%;
position:absolute;
left:0;
top:0;
background:yellow;
text-align:center;
padding:20px;
/* New lines for alignment */
display: flex;
align-items: center;
justify-content: center;
}
New .btn class (just removed the old tags)
.btn {
display:inline-block;
padding:5px 12px;
line-height:34px;
color:#fff;
background:red;
}
EDIT: After researching block elements have the property to expand to 100% of the parent container. This can be explained in more detail here. This is why display:block div expands until it reaches the padding on the .box class.
To answer why the display: inline-block element is slightly misaligned is because by default it is aligned on the baseline. See here for reference. Changing the vertical alignment of the div to be vertical-align: top will fix this.
Here is the new fiddle that uses all your previous syntax just with the added vertical-align: middle property.

Text-overflow CSS truncation

Earlier i was doing it dynamically using JS.. but we were getting some performance issues cuz of which we have to come with an alternative option.
I am now truncating a long text on my tab names using text-overflow style.
but i have a small issue if some one can resolve it
currently this is how my text truncation looks like
This text has been trun...
Here the three dots (...) comes in black colour and i want to change it to red.
Is there a way that we can achieve this one?
Works here:
http://jsfiddle.net/TReRs/4/
.overme {
width: 300px;
overflow:hidden;
white-space:nowrap;
text-overflow: ellipsis;
color: red;
}
<div class="overme">
how much wood can a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?
</div>
Trailing dots/ellipsis are colored in red using that basic CSS.
**Easy Way to do with css **
HTML
<div class="text-truncate">
The company’s commitment to rebuilding the relationship with you, our community</div>
Css :
.text-truncate {
overflow: hidden;
text-overflow: ellipsis;
white-space: nowrap;
}
I assume you only want the dots to appear in red? Unfortunately this isn't possible with simple css. However I found a tutorial which manages to make a custom ellipsis style, that will only be displayed when it's necessary:
https://www.mobify.com/dev/multiline-ellipsis-in-pure-css/
It's quite a nice hack and not easy to explain in words. Maybe this jsfiddle I just made can help you:
http://jsfiddle.net/MyUQJ/9/
Remove the overflow: hidden; on the .wrap to see what's happening. The main idea is that the .end div moves to the left bottom in .left-side when the text is overflowing, while when it's not overflowing it's on the right bottom of the .text. Then the .ellipsis div is positioned absolute inside the relative .end, so you when you position it to the right it's visible when the text is overflowing and it's overflowing when the text isn't overflowing! Funny, isn't it?
Anyway, here's the raw code:
HTML:
<div class="wrap">
<div class="left-side"></div>
<div class="text">
This is a short story, it
doesn't need to be ellipsed.
</div>
<div class="end">
end
<div class="ellipsis">...</div>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<div class="wrap">
<div class="left-side"></div>
<div class="text">
This is a long story. You won't be able to
read the end of this story because it will
be to long for the box I'm in. The story is
not too interesting though so it's good you
don't waste your time on this.
</div>
<div class="end">
end
<div class="ellipsis">...</div>
</div>
</div>
CSS:
.wrap {
height: 100px;
width: 234px;
border: solid 1px #000;
overflow: hidden;
}
.left-side {
float: left;
width: 32px;
height: 100px;
background: #F00;
}
.text {
float: right;
border: solid 1px #0F0;
width: 200px;
}
.end {
position: relative;
float: right;
width: 30px;
border: solid 1px #00F;
}
.ellipsis {
position: absolute;
top: -25px;
left: 198px;
background: white;
font-weight: bold;
color: #F0F;
}
Of course, when you're gonna implement this you want to remove all the borders and the 'end' text. I made this to be an easy to understand example. Also you probably want to give the wrap a position: absolute; and then give it margin-left: -32px, where the width is the width for the .left-side, so your text won't have a margin on the left side.
Good luck!
Dolarzo's answer was perfect, just a little tweak to make it super-perfect, use max-width instead of width, so when text is short it displays normally in position, but ONLY when it is long, truncation occurs. You may also use relative values for width to make things more dynamically responsive, like so:
width: 25vw;

No scrollbar for DIV wider than browser

I'm doing some tests on a website using Wordpress as a CMS. In the example below the top left of the page has an "S" graphic outside of the main content area, clipped accordingly depending on the browser width. I would like to do something similar with an "L" graphic to the right in the footer.
The page width is set to 960px, and I've made the footer container DIV 1088px so that the "L" appears outside the content area. The trouble is this makes a scrollbar appear when it exceeds the current width of the browser.
I've tried overflow:hidden on the footer container DIV but this doesn't seem to work. I've also tried overflow:hidden on the BODY element and this works ok in IE, but not in other browsers.
Example: http://unclemort.com/wp/
I really hope there is away to do this, any help gratefully received.
I was trying to figure this out myself today and stumbled upon the answer.
What you need is a surrounding element around everything that has this:
#wrapper {
min-width: 600px; //whatever width you want
overflow-x: hidden;
}
Your main content should have that same width, and the things that need to jut out should have a negative margin.
Here's a complete example:
HTML:
<div id="outer">
<div id="container">
<div class="row">
<div class="inner">Hello World</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
CSS:
#outer {
min-width: 300px;
overflow-x: hidden;
}
#container {
width: 300px;
margin: 0px auto;
background: gray;
height: 500px;
}
.row {
width: 350px;
background: blue;
margin-left: -25px;
}
.inner {
background: yellow;
margin-left: 25px;
width: 300px;
height: 100px;
}
#media screen and (min-width: 301px) {
body {
//overflow-x: hidden;
}
}
jsfiddle:
http://jsfiddle.net/aaronjensen/9szhN/
Try in style.css, line 65, adding:
#footer-container {
border: none;
overflow: hidden;
}
Explanation:
#footer-container #footer {
background: #f5e8f7 url('images/slobraico-footer-pink-full.gif') no-repeat top left;
width: 1088px;
height: 217px;
overflow: hidden;
}
The scrollbar you're hiding is effectively not there.
The scrollbar you're seing is another one.
The problem is that the footer is 1088px wide, and that's causing a scrollbar to appear.
As long as the footer has fixed width and it's parent doesn't have overflow: hidden, you'll get a scroll if there's not enough width for the footer to fit.
Same goes for any other container.

Resources