Related
I want to test if the $ip is equal to one of the two values: "a" or "b". When I test against only "a" it works. I didn`t want to do || and perform another grep+cut, since I have done those once, I would like to take the result and test it against these 2 values.
if [[ $(grep -e "$ip" FILE |cut -d' ' -f5) =~ 'a\|b'; then
echo "OK"
fi
You don't have to do another grep+cut, you can always assign the result to a variable. Regex match is not equivalent to equality check. The following will be more readable
var=...; if [[ "$var" = "a" || "$var" = "b" ]]; then echo OK; fi
A case statement is a readable alternative
case "$(grep ...)" in
a|b)
echo OK
;;
*)
echo not OK
;;
esac
i=0
EDA="xx7p2"
while read line
do
echo "i is --- $i"
echo " PACKAGE IS - --$EDA--"
#echo $line "\n"
if (( $i > 0 ))
then
package=$(echo $line | awk '{print $1}')
echo "EDA PACKAGE IN LOOP IS ---$Eda_package---"
if [ "$package" == "$EDA" ] ; then
#then
well_bias=$(echo $line | awk '{print $2}')
biasmap=$(echo $line | awk '{print $3}')
unified=$(echo $line | awk '{print $4}')
echo "eda pack --$package bias is --$wel biasmap is --$biasmap unified- --$unified"
fi
fi
i=$((i+1))
done < config.list
Here the statements inside the second if statement is not executed even if the two variables are same. Am I missing something here?
Make a simplified version of your problem to get it nailed down.
I can't reproduce your problem with this sample script:
#!/bin/bash
i=$1
a=$2
while read line
do
if (( $i > 0 ))
then
echo "1st if "+$i
if [ "$a" == "foo" ] ; then
echo "2nd if"
fi
fi
i=$((i+1))
done < nfoo.sh
called nfoo.sh and calling it ./nfoo.sh 4 bar, ./nfoo.sh -4 bar, ./nfoo.sh 4 foo and ./nfoo.sh -4 foo.
Might your error be in the package-assignement? You don't need awk for such a simple task. For a single word, to just extract the first word, you would use echo ${line/ */} while I see nothing wrong in your awk-statement.
Since you extract more arguments, I would suggest an array:
#!/bin/bash
i=$1
a=$2
while read line
do
if (( $i > 0 ))
then
arr=($line)
echo "1st if "+$i
if [ "if" == "${arr[0]}" ] ; then
echo "2nd if: " $line
fi
fi
i=$((i+1))
done < nfoo.sh
Btw.: Where is the else, the headline is talking about?
UPDATE: based on more testing with the small script below:
Having the $ as part of the string in package variable was a problem for me. If I escape it with a \$ I get it to work with the correct comparison operator mentioned below.
Use this for comparison (note the space before/after the =)
if [ "$package" = "$EDA" ] ; then
Without the space the expression seems to evaluate always to true. (Also, as an aside, using == without spaces before/after will result in an [: 11: $EDAx: unexpected operator)
I used this small script for testing, you can use to verify your own constructs, hope it's helpful. This works correctly as shown
#!/bin/bash
package="\$EDA"
echo $package
if [ "$package" = "\$EDA" ] ; then
echo "The same"
else
echo "Not the same"
fi
Note1: I added the else to be certain of the outcome of the comparison, as your script doesn't contain any else
Note2: It's always better to explicitly specify what shell to run rather than to depend on some external implicit environment settings, so I would recommend you add the #!/bin/bash to your script, it certainly won't hurt.
Other Comparison Operator from the Advanced Bash-Scripting Guide shows:
string comparison
=
is equal to
if [ "$a" = "$b" ]
Note the whitespace framing the =.
if [ "$a"="$b" ] is not equivalent to the above.
== is equal to
if [ "$a" == "$b" ]
This is a synonym for =.
I am trying to write a script in bash that check the validity of a user input.
I want to match the input (say variable x) to a list of valid values.
what I have come up with at the moment is:
for item in $list
do
if [ "$x" == "$item" ]; then
echo "In the list"
exit
fi
done
My question is if there is a simpler way to do this,
something like a list.contains(x) for most programming languages.
Say list is:
list="11 22 33"
my code will echo the message only for those values since list is treated as an array and not a string,
all the string manipulations will validate 1 while I would want it to fail.
[[ $list =~ (^|[[:space:]])$x($|[[:space:]]) ]] && echo 'yes' || echo 'no'
or create a function:
contains() {
[[ $1 =~ (^|[[:space:]])$2($|[[:space:]]) ]] && exit(0) || exit(1)
}
to use it:
contains aList anItem
echo $? # 0： match, 1: failed
how about
echo $list | grep -w -q $x
you could either check the output or $? of above line to make the decision.
grep -w checks on whole word patterns. Adding -q prevents echoing the list.
Matvey is right, but you should quote $x and consider any kind of "spaces" (e.g. new line) with
[[ $list =~ (^|[[:space:]])"$x"($|[[:space:]]) ]] && echo 'yes' || echo 'no'
so, i.e.
# list_include_item "10 11 12" "2"
function list_include_item {
local list="$1"
local item="$2"
if [[ $list =~ (^|[[:space:]])"$item"($|[[:space:]]) ]] ; then
# yes, list include item
result=0
else
result=1
fi
return $result
}
end then
`list_include_item "10 11 12" "12"` && echo "yes" || echo "no"
or
if `list_include_item "10 11 12" "1"` ; then
echo "yes"
else
echo "no"
fi
Note that you must use "" in case of variables:
`list_include_item "$my_list" "$my_item"` && echo "yes" || echo "no"
IMHO easiest solution is to prepend and append the original string with a space and check against a regex with [[ ]]
haystack='foo bar'
needle='bar'
if [[ " $haystack " =~ .*\ $needle\ .* ]]; then
...
fi
this will not be false positive on values with values containing the needle as a substring, e.g. with a haystack foo barbaz.
(The concept is shamelessly stolen form JQuery's hasClass()-Method)
You can use (* wildcards) outside a case statement, too, if you use double brackets:
string='My string';
if [[ $string == *My* ]]
then
echo "It's there!";
fi
If it isn't too long; you can just string them between equality along a logical OR comparison like so.
if [ $ITEM == "item1" -o $ITEM == "item2" -o $ITEM == "item3" ]; then
echo In the list
fi
I had this exact problem and while the above is ugly it is more obvious what is going on than the other generalized solutions.
If your list of values is to be hard-coded in the script, it's fairly simple to test using case. Here's a short example, which you can adapt to your requirements:
for item in $list
do
case "$x" in
item1|item2)
echo "In the list"
;;
not_an_item)
echo "Error" >&2
exit 1
;;
esac
done
If the list is an array variable at runtime, one of the other answers is probably a better fit.
There's a cleaner way to check if string is in the list:
if [[ $my_str = #(str1|str2|str3) ]]; then
echo "string found"
fi
Consider exploiting the keys of associative arrays. I would presume this outperforms both regex/pattern matching and looping, although I haven't profiled it.
declare -A list=( [one]=1 [two]=two [three]='any non-empty value' )
for value in one two three four
do
echo -n "$value is "
# a missing key expands to the null string,
# and we've set each interesting key to a non-empty value
[[ -z "${list[$value]}" ]] && echo -n '*not* '
echo "a member of ( ${!list[*]} )"
done
Output:
one is a member of ( one two three )
two is a member of ( one two three )
three is a member of ( one two three )
four is *not* a member of ( one two three )
If the list is fixed in the script, I like the following the best:
validate() {
grep -F -q -x "$1" <<EOF
item 1
item 2
item 3
EOF
}
Then use validate "$x" to test if $x is allowed.
If you want a one-liner, and don't care about whitespace in item names, you can use this (notice -w instead of -x):
validate() { echo "11 22 33" | grep -F -q -w "$1"; }
Notes:
This is POSIX sh compliant.
validate does not accept substrings (remove the -x option to grep if you want that).
validate interprets its argument as a fixed string, not a regular
expression (remove the -F option to grep if you want that).
Sample code to exercise the function:
for x in "item 1" "item2" "item 3" "3" "*"; do
echo -n "'$x' is "
validate "$x" && echo "valid" || echo "invalid"
done
I find it's easier to use the form echo $LIST | xargs -n1 echo | grep $VALUE as illustrated below:
LIST="ITEM1 ITEM2"
VALUE="ITEM1"
if [ -n "`echo $LIST | xargs -n1 echo | grep -e \"^$VALUE`$\" ]; then
...
fi
This works for a space-separated list, but you could adapt it to any other delimiter (like :) by doing the following:
LIST="ITEM1:ITEM2"
VALUE="ITEM1"
if [ -n "`echo $LIST | sed 's|:|\\n|g' | grep -e \"^$VALUE`$\"`" ]; then
...
fi
Note that the " are required for the test to work.
Thought I'd add my solution to the list.
# Checks if element "$1" is in array "$2"
# #NOTE:
# Be sure that array is passed in the form:
# "${ARR[#]}"
elementIn () {
# shopt -s nocasematch # Can be useful to disable case-matching
local e
for e in "${#:2}"; do [[ "$e" == "$1" ]] && return 0; done
return 1
}
# Usage:
list=(11 22 33)
item=22
if elementIn "$item" "${list[#]}"; then
echo TRUE;
else
echo FALSE
fi
# TRUE
item=44
elementIn $item "${list[#]}" && echo TRUE || echo FALSE
# FALSE
The shell built-in compgen can help here. It can take a list with the -W flag and return any of the potential matches it finds.
# My list can contain spaces so I want to set the internal
# file separator to newline to preserve the original strings.
IFS=$'\n'
# Create a list of acceptable strings.
accept=( 'foo' 'bar' 'foo bar' )
# The string we will check
word='foo'
# compgen will return a list of possible matches of the
# variable 'word' with the best match being first.
compgen -W "${accept[*]}" "$word"
# Returns:
# foo
# foo bar
We can write a function to test if a string equals the best match of acceptable strings. This allows you to return a 0 or 1 for a pass or fail respectively.
function validate {
local IFS=$'\n'
local accept=( 'foo' 'bar' 'foo bar' )
if [ "$1" == "$(compgen -W "${accept[*]}" "$1" | head -1)" ] ; then
return 0
else
return 1
fi
}
Now you can write very clean tests to validate if a string is acceptable.
validate "blah" || echo unacceptable
if validate "foo" ; then
echo acceptable
else
echo unacceptable
fi
Prior answers don't use tr which I found to be useful with grep. Assuming that the items in the list are space delimited, to check for an exact match:
echo $mylist | tr ' ' '\n' | grep -F -x -q "$myitem"
This will return exit code 0 if the item is in the list, or exit code 1 if it isn't.
It's best to use it as a function:
_contains () { # Check if space-separated list $1 contains line $2
echo "$1" | tr ' ' '\n' | grep -F -x -q "$2"
}
mylist="aa bb cc"
# Positive check
if _contains "${mylist}" "${myitem}"; then
echo "in list"
fi
# Negative check
if ! _contains "${mylist}" "${myitem}"; then
echo "not in list"
fi
Late to the show? Following very easy variant was not clearly mentioned yet. I use case for checking simple lists, which is a general Bourne Shell idiom not relying on anything external nor extended:
haystack='a b c'
needle='b'
case " $haystack " in (*" $needle "*) :;; (*) false;; esac
Please note the use of the separator (here: SPC) to correcyly delimit the pattern: At the beginning and end of " $haystack " and likewise in the test of " $needle ".
This statement returns true ($?=0) in case $needle is in $haystack, false otherwise.
Also you can test for more than one $needle very easily. When there are several similar cases like
if (haystack.contains(needle1)) { run1() } elif (haystack.contains(needle2)) { run2() } else { run3() }
you can wrap this into the case, too:
case " $haystack " in (*" $needle1 "*) run1;; (*" $needle2 "*) run2;; (*) run3;; esac
and so on
This also works for all lists with values which do not include the separator itself, like comma:
haystack=' a , b , c '
needle=' b '
case ",$haystack," in (*",$needle,"*) :;; (*) false;; esac
Note that if values can contain anything including the separator sequence (except NUL, as shells do not suport NUL in variables as you cannot pass arguments containing NUL to commands) then you need to use arrays. Arrays are ksh/bashisms and not supported by "ordinary" POSIX/Bourne shells. (You can work around this limitation using $# in POSIX-Shells, but this is something completely different than what was aked here.)
Can the (*) false part be left away?
No, as this is the critical return value. By default case returns true.
Yes if you do not need the return value and put your processing at the location of the :
Why the :;;
We could also write true;;, but I am used to use : instead of true because it is shorter and faster to type
Also I consider not writing anything bad practice, as it is not obvious to everybody that the default return value of case is true.
Also "leaving out" the command usually indicates "something was forgotten here". So putting a redundant ":" there clearly indicates "it is intended to do nothing else than return true here".
In bash you can also use ksh/bashisms like ;& (fallthroug) or ;;& (test other patterns) to express if (haystack.contains(needle1)) { run1(); }; if (haystack.contains(needle2)) { run2(); }
Hence usually case is much more maintainable than other regex constructs. Also it does not use regex, it only use shell patterns, which might even be faster.
Reusable function:
: Needle "list" Seperator_opt
NeedleListSep()
{
if [ 3 -gt $# ];
then NeedleListSep "$1" "$2" " ";
else case "$3$2$3" in (*"$3$1$3"*) return 0;; esac; return 1;
fi;
}
In bash you can simplify this to
: Needle "list" Seperator_opt
NeedleListSep()
{
local s="${3-" "}";
case "$s$2$s" in (*"$s$1$s"*) return 0;; esac; return 1;
}
Use like this
Test() {
NeedleListSep "$1" "a b c" && echo found $1 || echo no $1;
NeedleListSep "$1" "a,b,c" ',' && echo found $1 || echo no $1;
NeedleListSep "$1" "a # b # c" ' # ' && echo found $1 || echo no $1;
NeedleListSep "$1" "abc" '' && echo found $1 || echo no $1;
}
Test a
Test z
As shown above, this also works for degerated cases where the separator is the empty string (so each character of the list is a needle). Example:
Test
returns
no
no
no
found
As the empty string is cleary part of abc in case your separator is the empty string, right?
Note that this function is Public Domain as there is absolutely nothing to it which can be genuinely copyrighted.
An alternative solution inspired by the accepted response, but that uses an inverted logic:
MODE="${1}"
echo "<${MODE}>"
[[ "${MODE}" =~ ^(preview|live|both)$ ]] && echo "OK" || echo "Uh?"
Here, the input ($MODE) must be one of the options in the regular expression ('preview', 'live', or 'both'), contrary to matching the whole options list to the user input. Of course, you do not expect the regular expression to change.
Examples
$ in_list super test me out
NO
$ in_list "super dude" test me out
NO
$ in_list "super dude" test me "super dude"
YES
# How to use in another script
if [ $(in_list $1 OPTION1 OPTION2) == "NO" ]
then
echo "UNKNOWN type for param 1: Should be OPTION1 or OPTION2"
exit;
fi
in_list
function show_help()
{
IT=$(CAT <<EOF
usage: SEARCH_FOR {ITEM1} {ITEM2} {ITEM3} ...
e.g.
a b c d -> NO
a b a d -> YES
"test me" how "test me" -> YES
)
echo "$IT"
exit
}
if [ "$1" == "help" ]
then
show_help
fi
if [ "$#" -eq 0 ]; then
show_help
fi
SEARCH_FOR=$1
shift;
for ITEM in "$#"
do
if [ "$SEARCH_FOR" == "$ITEM" ]
then
echo "YES"
exit;
fi
done
echo "NO"
Assuming TARGET variable can be only 'binomial' or 'regression', then following would do:
# Check for modeling types known to this script
if [ $( echo "${TARGET}" | egrep -c "^(binomial|regression)$" ) -eq 0 ]; then
echo "This scoring program can only handle 'binomial' and 'regression' methods now." >&2
usage
fi
You could add more strings into the list by separating them with a | (pipe) character.
Advantage of using egrep, is that you could easily add case insensitivity (-i), or check more complex scenarios with a regular expression.
This is almost your original proposal but almost a 1-liner. Not that complicated as other valid answers, and not so depending on bash versions (can work with old bashes).
OK=0 ; MP_FLAVOURS="vanilla lemon hazelnut straciatella"
for FLAV in $MP_FLAVOURS ; do [ $FLAV == $FLAVOR ] && { OK=1 ; break; } ; done
[ $OK -eq 0 ] && { echo "$FLAVOR not a valid value ($MP_FLAVOURS)" ; exit 1 ; }
I guess my proposal can still be improved, both in length and style.
Simple oneliner...
if [[ " 11 22 33 " == *" ${x} "* ]]; then echo "${x} is in the list"; fi;
Add before fi: else echo "${x} is NOT in the list";
The script below implements contains function for a list.
function contains {
local target=$1
shift
printf '%s\n' "$#" | grep -x -q "$target"
out=$?
(( out = 1 - out ))
return $out
}
If you convert a string based on white space into a list and use it, it seems to be solved as follows.
list="11 22 33"
IFS=" " read -ra parsed_list <<< "$list"
# parsed_list would be ("11" "22" "33")
contains "11" "${parsed_list[#]}"
echo $? # 1
contains "22" "${parsed_list[#]}"
echo $? # 1
contains "1" "${parsed_list[#]}"
echo $? # 0
contains "11 22" "${parsed_list[#]}"
echo $? # 0
I would like to check if a string begins with "node" e.g. "node001". Something like
if [ $HOST == user* ]
then
echo yes
fi
How can I do it correctly?
I further need to combine expressions to check if HOST is either "user1" or begins with "node"
if [ [[ $HOST == user1 ]] -o [[ $HOST == node* ]] ];
then
echo yes
fi
> > > -bash: [: too many arguments
How can I do it correctly?
This snippet on the Advanced Bash Scripting Guide says:
# The == comparison operator behaves differently within a double-brackets
# test than within single brackets.
[[ $a == z* ]] # True if $a starts with a "z" (wildcard matching).
[[ $a == "z*" ]] # True if $a is equal to z* (literal matching).
So you had it nearly correct; you needed double brackets, not single brackets.
With regards to your second question, you can write it this way:
HOST=user1
if [[ $HOST == user1 ]] || [[ $HOST == node* ]] ;
then
echo yes1
fi
HOST=node001
if [[ $HOST == user1 ]] || [[ $HOST == node* ]] ;
then
echo yes2
fi
Which will echo
yes1
yes2
Bash's if syntax is hard to get used to (IMO).
If you're using a recent version of Bash (v3+), I suggest the Bash regex comparison operator =~, for example,
if [[ "$HOST" =~ ^user.* ]]; then
echo "yes"
fi
To match this or that in a regex, use |, for example,
if [[ "$HOST" =~ ^user.*|^host1 ]]; then
echo "yes"
fi
Note - this is 'proper' regular expression syntax.
user* means use and zero-or-more occurrences of r, so use and userrrr will match.
user.* means user and zero-or-more occurrences of any character, so user1, userX will match.
^user.* means match the pattern user.* at the begin of $HOST.
If you're not familiar with regular expression syntax, try referring to this resource.
Note that the Bash =~ operator only does regular expression matching when the right hand side is UNQUOTED. If you do quote the right hand side, "any part of the pattern may be quoted to force it to be matched as a string.". You should not quote the right hand side even when doing parameter expansion.
I always try to stick with POSIX sh instead of using Bash extensions, since one of the major points of scripting is portability (besides connecting programs, not replacing them).
In sh, there is an easy way to check for an "is-prefix" condition.
case $HOST in node*)
# Your code here
esac
Given how old, arcane and crufty sh is (and Bash is not the cure: It's more complicated, less consistent and less portable), I'd like to point out a very nice functional aspect: While some syntax elements like case are built-in, the resulting constructs are no different than any other job. They can be composed in the same way:
if case $HOST in node*) true;; *) false;; esac; then
# Your code here
fi
Or even shorter
if case $HOST in node*) ;; *) false;; esac; then
# Your code here
fi
Or even shorter (just to present ! as a language element -- but this is bad style now)
if ! case $HOST in node*) false;; esac; then
# Your code here
fi
If you like being explicit, build your own language element:
beginswith() { case $2 in "$1"*) true;; *) false;; esac; }
Isn't this actually quite nice?
if beginswith node "$HOST"; then
# Your code here
fi
And since sh is basically only jobs and string-lists (and internally processes, out of which jobs are composed), we can now even do some light functional programming:
beginswith() { case $2 in "$1"*) true;; *) false;; esac; }
checkresult() { if [ $? = 0 ]; then echo TRUE; else echo FALSE; fi; }
all() {
test=$1; shift
for i in "$#"; do
$test "$i" || return
done
}
all "beginswith x" x xy xyz ; checkresult # Prints TRUE
all "beginswith x" x xy abc ; checkresult # Prints FALSE
This is elegant. Not that I'd advocate using sh for anything serious -- it breaks all too quickly on real world requirements (no lambdas, so we must use strings. But nesting function calls with strings is not possible, pipes are not possible, etc.)
You can select just the part of the string you want to check:
if [ "${HOST:0:4}" = user ]
For your follow-up question, you could use an OR:
if [[ "$HOST" == user1 || "$HOST" == node* ]]
I prefer the other methods already posted, but some people like to use:
case "$HOST" in
user1|node*)
echo "yes";;
*)
echo "no";;
esac
Edit:
I've added your alternates to the case statement above
In your edited version you have too many brackets. It should look like this:
if [[ $HOST == user1 || $HOST == node* ]];
While I find most answers here quite correct, many of them contain unnecessary Bashisms. POSIX parameter expansion gives you all you need:
[ "${host#user}" != "${host}" ]
and
[ "${host#node}" != "${host}" ]
${var#expr} strips the smallest prefix matching expr from ${var} and returns that. Hence if ${host} does not start with user (node), ${host#user} (${host#node}) is the same as ${host}.
expr allows fnmatch() wildcards, thus ${host#node??} and friends also work.
Since # has a meaning in Bash, I got to the following solution.
In addition I like better to pack strings with "" to overcome spaces, etc.
A="#sdfs"
if [[ "$A" == "#"* ]];then
echo "Skip comment line"
fi
Adding a tiny bit more syntax detail to Mark Rushakoff's highest rank answer.
The expression
$HOST == node*
Can also be written as
$HOST == "node"*
The effect is the same. Just make sure the wildcard is outside the quoted text. If the wildcard is inside the quotes it will be interpreted literally (i.e. not as a wildcard).
#OP, for both your questions you can use case/esac:
string="node001"
case "$string" in
node*) echo "found";;
* ) echo "no node";;
esac
Second question
case "$HOST" in
node*) echo "ok";;
user) echo "ok";;
esac
case "$HOST" in
node*|user) echo "ok";;
esac
Or Bash 4.0
case "$HOST" in
user) ;&
node*) echo "ok";;
esac
if [ [[ $HOST == user1 ]] -o [[ $HOST == node* ]] ];
then
echo yes
fi
doesn't work, because all of [, [[, and test recognize the same nonrecursive grammar. See section CONDITIONAL EXPRESSIONS on your Bash man page.
As an aside, the SUSv3 says
The KornShell-derived conditional command (double bracket [[]]) was removed from the shell command language description in an early proposal. Objections were raised that the real problem is misuse of the test command ([), and putting it into the shell is the wrong way to fix the problem. Instead, proper documentation and a new shell reserved word (!) are sufficient.
Tests that require multiple test operations can be done at the shell level using individual invocations of the test command and shell logicals, rather than using the error-prone -o flag of test.
You'd need to write it this way, but test doesn't support it:
if [ $HOST == user1 -o $HOST == node* ];
then
echo yes
fi
test uses = for string equality, and more importantly it doesn't support pattern matching.
case / esac has good support for pattern matching:
case $HOST in
user1|node*) echo yes ;;
esac
It has the added benefit that it doesn't depend on Bash, and the syntax is portable. From the Single Unix Specification, The Shell Command Language:
case word in
[(]pattern1) compound-list;;
[[(]pattern[ | pattern] ... ) compound-list;;] ...
[[(]pattern[ | pattern] ... ) compound-list]
esac
grep
Forgetting performance, this is POSIX and looks nicer than case solutions:
mystr="abcd"
if printf '%s' "$mystr" | grep -Eq '^ab'; then
echo matches
fi
Explanation:
printf '%s' to prevent printf from expanding backslash escapes: Bash printf literal verbatim string
grep -q prevents echo of matches to stdout: How to check if a file contains a specific string using Bash
grep -E enables extended regular expressions, which we need for the ^
Keep it simple
word="appel"
if [[ $word = a* ]]
then
echo "Starts with a"
else
echo "No match"
fi
I tweaked #markrushakoff's answer to make it a callable function:
function yesNo {
# Prompts user with $1, returns true if response starts with y or Y or is empty string
read -e -p "
$1 [Y/n] " YN
[[ "$YN" == y* || "$YN" == Y* || "$YN" == "" ]]
}
Use it like this:
$ if yesNo "asfd"; then echo "true"; else echo "false"; fi
asfd [Y/n] y
true
$ if yesNo "asfd"; then echo "true"; else echo "false"; fi
asfd [Y/n] Y
true
$ if yesNo "asfd"; then echo "true"; else echo "false"; fi
asfd [Y/n] yes
true
$ if yesNo "asfd"; then echo "true"; else echo "false"; fi
asfd [Y/n]
true
$ if yesNo "asfd"; then echo "true"; else echo "false"; fi
asfd [Y/n] n
false
$ if yesNo "asfd"; then echo "true"; else echo "false"; fi
asfd [Y/n] ddddd
false
Here is a more complex version that provides for a specified default value:
function toLowerCase {
echo "$1" | tr '[:upper:]' '[:lower:]'
}
function yesNo {
# $1: user prompt
# $2: default value (assumed to be Y if not specified)
# Prompts user with $1, using default value of $2, returns true if response starts with y or Y or is empty string
local DEFAULT=yes
if [ "$2" ]; then local DEFAULT="$( toLowerCase "$2" )"; fi
if [[ "$DEFAULT" == y* ]]; then
local PROMPT="[Y/n]"
else
local PROMPT="[y/N]"
fi
read -e -p "
$1 $PROMPT " YN
YN="$( toLowerCase "$YN" )"
{ [ "$YN" == "" ] && [[ "$PROMPT" = *Y* ]]; } || [[ "$YN" = y* ]]
}
Use it like this:
$ if yesNo "asfd" n; then echo "true"; else echo "false"; fi
asfd [y/N]
false
$ if yesNo "asfd" n; then echo "true"; else echo "false"; fi
asfd [y/N] y
true
$ if yesNo "asfd" y; then echo "true"; else echo "false"; fi
asfd [Y/n] n
false
I just can't figure out how do I make sure an argument passed to my script is a number or not.
All I want to do is something like this:
test *isnumber* $1 && VAR=$1 || echo "need a number"
Any help?
One approach is to use a regular expression, like so:
re='^[0-9]+$'
if ! [[ $yournumber =~ $re ]] ; then
echo "error: Not a number" >&2; exit 1
fi
If the value is not necessarily an integer, consider amending the regex appropriately; for instance:
^[0-9]+([.][0-9]+)?$
...or, to handle numbers with a sign:
^[+-]?[0-9]+([.][0-9]+)?$
Without bashisms (works even in the System V sh),
case $string in
''|*[!0-9]*) echo bad ;;
*) echo good ;;
esac
This rejects empty strings and strings containing non-digits, accepting everything else.
Negative or floating-point numbers need some additional work. An idea is to exclude - / . in the first "bad" pattern and add more "bad" patterns containing the inappropriate uses of them (?*-* / *.*.*)
The following solution can also be used in basic shells such as Bourne without the need for regular expressions. Basically any numeric value evaluation operations using non-numbers will result in an error which will be implicitly considered as false in shell:
"$var" -eq "$var"
as in:
#!/bin/bash
var=a
if [ -n "$var" ] && [ "$var" -eq "$var" ] 2>/dev/null; then
echo number
else
echo not a number
fi
You can can also test for $? the return code of the operation which is more explicit:
[ -n "$var" ] && [ "$var" -eq "$var" ] 2>/dev/null
if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
echo $var is not number
fi
Redirection of standard error is there to hide the "integer expression expected" message that bash prints out in case we do not have a number.
CAVEATS (thanks to the comments below):
Numbers with decimal points are not identified as valid "numbers"
Using [[ ]] instead of [ ] will always evaluate to true
Most non-Bash shells will always evaluate this expression as true
The behavior in Bash is undocumented and may therefore change without warning
If the value includes spaces after the number (e.g. "1 a") produces error, like bash: [[: 1 a: syntax error in expression (error token is "a")
If the value is the same as var-name (e.g. i="i"), produces error, like bash: [[: i: expression recursion level exceeded (error token is "i")
Nobody suggested bash's extended pattern matching:
[[ $1 == ?(-)+([0-9]) ]] && echo "$1 is an integer"
or using a POSIX character class:
[[ $1 == ?(-)+([[:digit:]]) ]] && echo "$1 is an integer"
This tests if a number is a non-negative integer. It is shell independent (i.e. without bashisms) and uses only shell built-ins:
[ ! -z "${num##*[!0-9]*}" ] && echo "is a number" || echo "is not a number";
A previous version of this answer proposed:
[ -z "${num##[0-9]*}" ] && echo "is a number" || echo "is not a number";
but this is INCORRECT since it accepts any string starting with a digit, as jilles suggested.
Some performance and compatibility hints
There are some strongly different methods regarding different kinds of tests.
I reviewed most relevant methods and built this comparison.
Unsigned Integer is_uint()
These functions implement code to assess whether an expression is an unsigned integer, i.e. consists entirely of digits.
Using parameter expansion
(This was my approach before all this!)
isuint_Parm() { [ "$1" ] && [ -z "${1//[0-9]}" ] ;}
Using fork to grep
isuint_Grep() { grep -qE '^[0-9]+$' <<<"$1"; }
I test this method only once because it's very slow. This is just there to show what not to do.
Using bash integer capabilities
isuint_Bash() { (( 10#$1 >= 0 )) 2>/dev/null ;}
or better:
isuint_Bash() { set -- ${1//[+-]/.};(( 10#$1 >= 0 )) 2>/dev/null ;}
Using case
isuint_Case() { case $1 in ''|*[!0-9]*) return 1;;esac;}
Using bash's regex
isuint_Regx() { [[ $1 =~ ^[0-9]+$ ]] ;}
Signed integer is_int()
These functions implement code to assess whether an expression is a signed integer, i.e. as above but permitting an optional sign before the number.
Using parameter expansion
isint_Parm() { local chk=${1#[+-]}; [ "$chk" ] && [ -z "${chk//[0-9]}" ] ;}
Using bash integer capabilities
isint_Bash() { set -- "${1//[!+-]}" ${1#${1//[!+-]}};
(( ( 0 ${1:-+} 10#$2 ) ? 1:1 )) 2>/dev/null ;}
Using case
isint_Case() { case ${1#[-+]} in ''|*[!0-9]*) return 1;;esac;}
Using bash's regex
isint_Regx() { [[ $1 =~ ^[+-]?[0-9]+$ ]] ;}
Number (unsigned float) is_num()
These functions implement code to assess whether an expression is a floating-point number, i.e. as above but permitting an optional decimal point and additional digits after it. This does not attempt to cover numeric expressions in scientific notation (e.g. 1.0234E-12).
Using parameter expansion
isnum_Parm() { local ck=${1#[+-]};ck=${ck/.};[ "$ck" ]&&[ -z "${ck//[0-9]}" ];}
Using bash's regex
isnum_Regx() { [[ $1 =~ ^[+-]?([0-9]+([.][0-9]*)?|\.[0-9]+)$ ]] ;}
Using case
isnum_Case() { case ${1#[-+]} in ''|.|*[!0-9.]*|*.*.*) return 1;; esac ;}
Tests of concepts
(You could copy/paste this test code after previous declared functions.)
testcases=(
0 1 42 -3 +42 +3. .9 3.14 +3.141 -31.4 '' . 3-3 3.1.4 3a a3 blah 'Good day!'
);printf '%-12s %4s %4s %4s %4s %4s %4s %4s %4s %4s %4s %4s %4s\n' Value\\Func \
U{Prm,Grp,Bsh,Cse,Rgx} I{Prm,Bsh,Cse,Rgx} N{Prm,Cse,Rgx};\
for var in "${testcases[#]}";do
outstr='';
for func in isuint_{Parm,Grep,Bash,Case,Regx} isint_{Parm,Bash,Case,Regx} \
isnum_{Parm,Case,Regx};do
if $func "$var"; then
outstr+=' ##'
else
outstr+=' --'
fi
done
printf '%-11s %s\n' "$var" "$outstr"
done
Should output:
Value\Func UPrm UGrp UBsh UCse URgx IPrm IBsh ICse IRgx NPrm NCse NRgx
0 ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ##
1 ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ##
42 ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ##
-3 -- -- -- -- -- ## ## ## ## ## ## ##
+42 -- -- -- -- -- ## ## ## ## ## ## ##
+3. -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ## ## ##
.9 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ## ## ##
3.14 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ## ## ##
+3.141 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ## ## ##
-31.4 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ## ## ##
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
. -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
3-3 -- -- -- -- -- -- ## -- -- -- -- --
3.1.4 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
3a -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
a3 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
blah -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Good day! -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
I hope! (Note: uint_bash seem not perfect!)
Performance comparison
Then I've built this test function:
testFunc() {
local tests=1000 start=${EPOCHREALTIME//.}
for ((;tests--;)) ;do
"$1" "$3"
done
printf -v "$2" %u $((${EPOCHREALTIME//.}-start))
}
percent(){ local p=00$((${1}00000/$2));printf -v "$3" %.2f%% ${p::-3}.${p: -3};}
sortedTests() {
local func NaNTime NumTime ftyp="$1" nTest="$2" tTest="$3" min i pct line
local -a order=()
shift 3
for func ;do
testFunc "${ftyp}_$func" NaNTime "$tTest"
testFunc "${ftyp}_$func" NumTime "$nTest"
order[NaNTime+NumTime]=${ftyp}_$func\ $NumTime\ $NaNTime
done
printf '%-12s %11s %11s %14s\n' Function Number NaN Total
min="${!order[*]}" min=${min%% *}
for i in "${!order[#]}";do
read -ra line <<<"${order[i]}"
percent "$i" "$min" pct
printf '%-12s %9d\U00B5s %9d\U00B5s %12d\U00B5s %9s\n' \
"${line[#]}" "$i" "$pct"
done
}
I could run in this way:
sortedTests isuint "This is not a number." 31415926535897932384 \
Case Grep Parm Bash Regx ;\
sortedTests isint "This is not a number." 31415926535897932384 \
Case Parm Bash Regx ;\
sortedTests isnum "This string is clearly not a number..." \
3.141592653589793238462643383279502884 Case Parm Regx
On my host, this shows somthing like:
Function Number NaN Total
isuint_Case 6499µs 6566µs 13065µs 100.00%
isuint_Parm 26687µs 31600µs 58287µs 446.13%
isuint_Regx 36511µs 40181µs 76692µs 587.00%
isuint_Bash 43819µs 40311µs 84130µs 643.93%
isuint_Grep 1298265µs 1224112µs 2522377µs 19306.37%
Function Number NaN Total
isint_Case 22687µs 21914µs 44601µs 100.00%
isint_Parm 35765µs 34428µs 70193µs 157.38%
isint_Regx 36949µs 42319µs 79268µs 177.73%
isint_Bash 55368µs 65095µs 120463µs 270.09%
Function Number NaN Total
isnum_Case 23313µs 23446µs 46759µs 100.00%
isnum_Parm 35677µs 42169µs 77846µs 166.48%
isnum_Regx 51864µs 69502µs 121366µs 259.56%
You could download full isnum comparission script here or full isnum comparission script as text here., (with UTF8 and LATIN handling).
Conclusion
case way is clearly the quickest! About 3x quicker than regex and 2x quicker than using parameter expansion.
forks (to grep or any binaries) are to be avoided when not needed.
case method has become my favored choice:
is_uint() { case $1 in '' | *[!0-9]* ) return 1;; esac ;}
is_int() { case ${1#[-+]} in '' | *[!0-9]* ) return 1;; esac ;}
is_unum() { case $1 in '' | . | *[!0-9.]* | *.*.* ) return 1;; esac ;}
is_num() { case ${1#[-+]} in '' | . | *[!0-9.]* | *.*.* ) return 1;; esac ;}
About compatibility
For this, I wrote a little test script based on previous tests, with:
for shell in bash dash 'busybox sh' ksh zsh "$#";do
printf "%-12s " "${shell%% *}"
$shell < <(testScript) 2>&1 | xargs
done
This shows:
bash Success
dash Success
busybox Success
ksh Success
zsh Success
As I know other bash based solution like regex and bash's integer won't work in many other shells and forks are resource expensive, I would prefer the case way
(just before parameter expansion which is mostly compatible too).
I'm surprised at the solutions directly parsing number formats in shell.
shell is not well suited to this, being a DSL for controlling files and processes.
There are ample number parsers a little lower down, for example:
isdecimal() {
# filter octal/hex/ord()
num=$(printf '%s' "$1" | sed "s/^0*\([1-9]\)/\1/; s/'/^/")
test "$num" && printf '%f' "$num" >/dev/null 2>&1
}
Change '%f' to whatever particular format you require.
I was looking at the answers and...
realized that nobody thought about FLOAT numbers (with dot)!
Using grep is great too.
-E means extended regexp
-q means quiet (doesn't echo)
-qE is the combination of both.
To test directly in the command line:
$ echo "32" | grep -E ^\-?[0-9]?\.?[0-9]+$
# answer is: 32
$ echo "3a2" | grep -E ^\-?[0-9]?\.?[0-9]+$
# answer is empty (false)
$ echo ".5" | grep -E ^\-?[0-9]?\.?[0-9]+$
# answer .5
$ echo "3.2" | grep -E ^\-?[0-9]?\.?[0-9]+$
# answer is 3.2
Using in a bash script:
check=`echo "$1" | grep -E ^\-?[0-9]*\.?[0-9]+$`
if [ "$check" != '' ]; then
# it IS numeric
echo "Yeap!"
else
# it is NOT numeric.
echo "nooop"
fi
To match JUST integers, use this:
# change check line to:
check=`echo "$1" | grep -E ^\-?[0-9]+$`
Just a follow up to #mary. But because I don't have enough rep, couldn't post this as a comment to that post. Anyways, here is what I used:
isnum() { awk -v a="$1" 'BEGIN {print (a == a + 0)}'; }
The function will return "1" if the argument is a number, otherwise will return "0". This works for integers as well as floats. Usage is something like:
n=-2.05e+07
res=`isnum "$n"`
if [ "$res" == "1" ]; then
echo "$n is a number"
else
echo "$n is not a number"
fi
test -z "${i//[0-9]}" && echo digits || echo no no no
${i//[0-9]} replaces any digit in the value of $i with an empty string, see man -P 'less +/parameter\/' bash. -z checks if resulting string has zero length.
if you also want to exclude the case when $i is empty, you could use one of these constructions:
test -n "$i" && test -z "${i//[0-9]}" && echo digits || echo not a number
[[ -n "$i" && -z "${i//[0-9]}" ]] && echo digits || echo not a number
For my problem, I only needed to ensure that a user doesn't accidentally enter some text thus I tried to keep it simple and readable
isNumber() {
(( $1 )) 2>/dev/null
}
According to the man page this pretty much does what I want
If the value of the expression is non-zero, the return status is 0
To prevent nasty error messages for strings that "might be numbers" I ignore the error output
$ (( 2s ))
bash: ((: 2s: value too great for base (error token is "2s")
This can be achieved by using grep to see if the variable in question matches an extended regular expression.
Test integer 1120:
yournumber=1120
if echo "$yournumber" | grep -qE '^[0-9]+$'; then
echo "Valid number."
else
echo "Error: not a number."
fi
Output: Valid number.
Test non-integer 1120a:
yournumber=1120a
if echo "$yournumber" | grep -qE '^[0-9]+$'; then
echo "Valid number."
else
echo "Error: not a number."
fi
Output: Error: not a number.
Explanation
The grep, the -E switch allows us to use extended regular expression '^[0-9]+$'. This regular expression means the variable should only [] contain the numbers 0-9 zero through nine from the ^ beginning to the $ end of the variable and should have at least + one character.
The grep, the -q quiet switch turns off any output whether or not it finds anything.
if checks the exit status of grep. Exit status 0 means success and anything greater means an error. The grep command has an exit status of 0 if it finds a match and 1 when it doesn't;
So putting it all together, in the if test, we echo the variable $yournumber and | pipe it to grep which with the -q switch silently matches the -E extended regular expression '^[0-9]+$' expression. The exit status of grep will be 0 if grep successfully found a match and 1 if it didn't. If succeeded to match, we echo "Valid number.". If it failed to match, we echo "Error: not a number.".
For Floats or Doubles
We can just change the regular expression from '^[0-9]+$' to '^[0-9]*\.?[0-9]+$' for floats or doubles.
Test float 1120.01:
yournumber=1120.01
if echo "$yournumber" | grep -qE '^[0-9]*\.?[0-9]+$'; then
echo "Valid number."
else
echo "Error: not a number."
fi
Output: Valid number.
Test float 11.20.01:
yournumber=11.20.01
if echo "$yournumber" | grep -qE '^[0-9]*\.?[0-9]+$'; then
echo "Valid number."
else
echo "Error: not a number."
fi
Output: Error: not a number.
For Negatives
To allow negative integers, just change the regular expression from '^[0-9]+$' to '^\-?[0-9]+$'.
To allow negative floats or doubles, just change the regular expression from '^[0-9]*\.?[0-9]+$' to '^\-?[0-9]*\.?[0-9]+$'.
Old question, but I just wanted to tack on my solution. This one doesn't require any strange shell tricks, or rely on something that hasn't been around forever.
if [ -n "$(printf '%s\n' "$var" | sed 's/[0-9]//g')" ]; then
echo 'is not numeric'
else
echo 'is numeric'
fi
Basically it just removes all digits from the input, and if you're left with a non-zero-length string then it wasn't a number.
I would try this:
printf "%g" "$var" &> /dev/null
if [[ $? == 0 ]] ; then
echo "$var is a number."
else
echo "$var is not a number."
fi
Note: this recognizes nan and inf as number.
Can't comment yet so I'll add my own answer, which is an extension to glenn jackman's answer using bash pattern matching.
My original need was to identify numbers and distinguish integers and floats. The function definitions deducted to:
function isInteger() {
[[ ${1} == ?(-)+([0-9]) ]]
}
function isFloat() {
[[ ${1} == ?(-)#(+([0-9]).*([0-9])|*([0-9]).+([0-9]))?(E?(-|+)+([0-9])) ]]
}
I used unit testing (with shUnit2) to validate my patterns worked as intended:
oneTimeSetUp() {
int_values="0 123 -0 -123"
float_values="0.0 0. .0 -0.0 -0. -.0 \
123.456 123. .456 -123.456 -123. -.456
123.456E08 123.E08 .456E08 -123.456E08 -123.E08 -.456E08 \
123.456E+08 123.E+08 .456E+08 -123.456E+08 -123.E+08 -.456E+08 \
123.456E-08 123.E-08 .456E-08 -123.456E-08 -123.E-08 -.456E-08"
}
testIsIntegerIsFloat() {
local value
for value in ${int_values}
do
assertTrue "${value} should be tested as integer" "isInteger ${value}"
assertFalse "${value} should not be tested as float" "isFloat ${value}"
done
for value in ${float_values}
do
assertTrue "${value} should be tested as float" "isFloat ${value}"
assertFalse "${value} should not be tested as integer" "isInteger ${value}"
done
}
Notes: The isFloat pattern can be modified to be more tolerant about decimal point (#(.,)) and the E symbol (#(Ee)). My unit tests test only values that are either integer or float, but not any invalid input.
[[ $1 =~ ^-?[0-9]+$ ]] && echo "number"
Don't forget - to include negative numbers!
A clear answer has already been given by #charles Dufy and others.
A pure bash solution would be using the following :
string="-12,345"
if [[ "$string" =~ ^-?[0-9]+[.,]?[0-9]*$ ]]
then
echo $string is a number
else
echo $string is not a number
fi
Although for real numbers it is not mandatory to have a number before the radix point.
To provide a more thorough support of floating numbers and scientific notation (many programs in C/Fortran or else will export float this way), a useful addition to this line would be the following :
string="1.2345E-67"
if [[ "$string" =~ ^-?[0-9]*[.,]?[0-9]*[eE]?-?[0-9]+$ ]]
then
echo $string is a number
else
echo $string is not a number
fi
Thus leading to a way to differentiate types of number, if you are looking for any specific type :
string="-12,345"
if [[ "$string" =~ ^-?[0-9]+$ ]]
then
echo $string is an integer
elif [[ "$string" =~ ^-?[0-9]*[.,]?[0-9]*$ ]]
then
echo $string is a float
elif [[ "$string" =~ ^-?[0-9]*[.,]?[0-9]*[eE]-?[0-9]+$ ]]
then
echo $string is a scientific number
else
echo $string is not a number
fi
Note: We could list the syntactical requirements for decimal and scientific notation, one being to allow comma as radix point, as well as ".". We would then assert that there must be only one such radix point. There can be two +/- signs in an [Ee] float. I have learned a few more rules from Aulu's work, and tested against bad strings such as '' '-' '-E-1' '0-0'. Here are my regex/substring/expr tools that seem to be holding up:
parse_num() {
local r=`expr "$1" : '.*\([.,]\)' 2>/dev/null | tr -d '\n'`
nat='^[+-]?[0-9]+[.,]?$' \
dot="${1%[.,]*}${r}${1##*[.,]}" \
float='^[\+\-]?([.,0-9]+[Ee]?[-+]?|)[0-9]+$'
[[ "$1" == $dot ]] && [[ "$1" =~ $float ]] || [[ "$1" =~ $nat ]]
} # usage: parse_num -123.456
I use expr. It returns a non-zero if you try to add a zero to a non-numeric value:
if expr -- "$number" + 0 > /dev/null 2>&1
then
echo "$number is a number"
else
echo "$number isn't a number"
fi
It might be possible to use bc if you need non-integers, but I don't believe bc has quite the same behavior. Adding zero to a non-number gets you zero and it returns a value of zero too. Maybe you can combine bc and expr. Use bc to add zero to $number. If the answer is 0, then try expr to verify that $number isn't zero.
One simple way is to check whether it contains non-digit characters. You replace all digit characters with nothing and check for length. If there's length it's not a number.
if [[ ! -n ${input//[0-9]/} ]]; then
echo "Input Is A Number"
fi
http://tldp.org/LDP/Bash-Beginners-Guide/html/sect_04_03.html
You can also use bash's character classes.
if [[ $VAR = *[[:digit:]]* ]]; then
echo "$VAR is numeric"
else
echo "$VAR is not numeric"
fi
Numerics will include space, the decimal point, and "e" or "E" for floating point.
But, if you specify a C-style hex number, i.e. "0xffff" or "0XFFFF", [[:digit:]] returns true. A bit of a trap here, bash allows you do to something like "0xAZ00" and still count it as a digit (isn't this from some weird quirk of GCC compilers that let you use 0x notation for bases other than 16???)
You might want to test for "0x" or "0X" before testing if it's a numeric if your input is completely untrusted, unless you want to accept hex numbers. That would be accomplished by:
if [[ ${VARIABLE:1:2} = "0x" ]] || [[ ${VARIABLE:1:2} = "0X" ]]; then echo "$VAR is not numeric"; fi
As i had to tamper with this lately and like karttu's appoach with the unit test the most. I revised the code and added some other solutions too, try it out yourself to see the results:
#!/bin/bash
# N={0,1,2,3,...} by syntaxerror
function isNaturalNumber()
{
[[ ${1} =~ ^[0-9]+$ ]]
}
# Z={...,-2,-1,0,1,2,...} by karttu
function isInteger()
{
[[ ${1} == ?(-)+([0-9]) ]]
}
# Q={...,-½,-¼,0.0,¼,½,...} by karttu
function isFloat()
{
[[ ${1} == ?(-)#(+([0-9]).*([0-9])|*([0-9]).+([0-9]))?(E?(-|+)+([0-9])) ]]
}
# R={...,-1,-½,-¼,0.E+n,¼,½,1,...}
function isNumber()
{
isNaturalNumber $1 || isInteger $1 || isFloat $1
}
bools=("TRUE" "FALSE")
int_values="0 123 -0 -123"
float_values="0.0 0. .0 -0.0 -0. -.0 \
123.456 123. .456 -123.456 -123. -.456 \
123.456E08 123.E08 .456E08 -123.456E08 -123.E08 -.456E08 \
123.456E+08 123.E+08 .456E+08 -123.456E+08 -123.E+08 -.456E+08 \
123.456E-08 123.E-08 .456E-08 -123.456E-08 -123.E-08 -.456E-08"
false_values="blah meh mooh blah5 67mooh a123bc"
for value in ${int_values} ${float_values} ${false_values}
do
printf " %5s=%-30s" $(isNaturalNumber $value) ${bools[$?]} $(printf "isNaturalNumber(%s)" $value)
printf "%5s=%-24s" $(isInteger $value) ${bools[$?]} $(printf "isInteger(%s)" $value)
printf "%5s=%-24s" $(isFloat $value) ${bools[$?]} $(printf "isFloat(%s)" $value)
printf "%5s=%-24s\n" $(isNumber $value) ${bools[$?]} $(printf "isNumber(%s)" $value)
done
So isNumber() includes dashes, commas and exponential notation and therefore returns TRUE on integers & floats where on the other hand isFloat() returns FALSE on integer values and isInteger() likewise returns FALSE on floats. For your convenience all as one liners:
isNaturalNumber() { [[ ${1} =~ ^[0-9]+$ ]]; }
isInteger() { [[ ${1} == ?(-)+([0-9]) ]]; }
isFloat() { [[ ${1} == ?(-)#(+([0-9]).*([0-9])|*([0-9]).+([0-9]))?(E?(-|+)+([0-9])) ]]; }
isNumber() { isNaturalNumber $1 || isInteger $1 || isFloat $1; }
I use printf as other answers mentioned, if you supply the format string "%f" or "%i" printf will do the checking for you. Easier than reinventing the checks, the syntax is simple and short and printf is ubiquitous. So its a decent choice in my opinion - you can also use the following idea to check for a range of things, its not only useful for checking numbers.
declare -r CHECK_FLOAT="%f"
declare -r CHECK_INTEGER="%i"
## <arg 1> Number - Number to check
## <arg 2> String - Number type to check
## <arg 3> String - Error message
function check_number() {
local NUMBER="${1}"
local NUMBER_TYPE="${2}"
local ERROR_MESG="${3}"
local -i PASS=1
local -i FAIL=0
case "${NUMBER_TYPE}" in
"${CHECK_FLOAT}")
if ((! $(printf "${CHECK_FLOAT}" "${NUMBER}" &>/dev/random;echo $?))); then
echo "${PASS}"
else
echo "${ERROR_MESG}" 1>&2
echo "${FAIL}"
fi
;;
"${CHECK_INTEGER}")
if ((! $(printf "${CHECK_INTEGER}" "${NUMBER}" &>/dev/random;echo $?))); then
echo "${PASS}"
else
echo "${ERROR_MESG}" 1>&2
echo "${FAIL}"
fi
;;
*)
echo "Invalid number type format: ${NUMBER_TYPE} to check_number()." 1>&2
echo "${FAIL}"
;;
esac
}
>$ var=45
>$ (($(check_number $var "${CHECK_INTEGER}" "Error: Found $var - An integer is required."))) && { echo "$var+5" | bc; }
I like Alberto Zaccagni's answer.
if [ "$var" -eq "$var" ] 2>/dev/null; then
Important prerequisites:
- no subshells spawned
- no RE parsers invoked
- most shell applications don't use real numbers
But if $var is complex (e.g. an associative array access), and if the number will be a non-negative integer (most use-cases), then this is perhaps more efficient?
if [ "$var" -ge 0 ] 2> /dev/null; then ..
To catch negative numbers:
if [[ $1 == ?(-)+([0-9.]) ]]
then
echo number
else
echo not a number
fi
You could use "let" too like this :
[ ~]$ var=1
[ ~]$ let $var && echo "It's a number" || echo "It's not a number"
It\'s a number
[ ~]$ var=01
[ ~]$ let $var && echo "It's a number" || echo "It's not a number"
It\'s a number
[ ~]$ var=toto
[ ~]$ let $var && echo "It's a number" || echo "It's not a number"
It\'s not a number
[ ~]$
But I prefer use the "=~" Bash 3+ operator like some answers in this thread.
Almost as you want in syntax. Just need a function isnumber:
#!/usr/bin/bash
isnumber(){
num=$1
if [ -z "${num##*[!0-9]*}" ];
then return 1
else
return 0
fi
}
$(isnumber $1) && VAR=$1 || echo "need a number";
echo "VAR is $VAR"
test:
$ ./isnumtest 10
VAR is 10
$ ./isnumtest abc10
need a number
VAR is
printf '%b' "-123\nABC" | tr '[:space:]' '_' | grep -q '^-\?[[:digit:]]\+$' && echo "Integer." || echo "NOT integer."
Remove the -\? in grep matching pattern if you don't accept negative integer.
Did the same thing here with a regular expression that test the entire part and decimals part, separated with a dot.
re="^[0-9]*[.]{0,1}[0-9]*$"
if [[ $1 =~ $re ]]
then
echo "is numeric"
else
echo "Naahh, not numeric"
fi
Easy-to-understand and compatible solution, with test command :
test $myVariable -eq 0 2>/dev/null
if [ $? -le 1 ]; then echo 'ok'; else echo 'KO'; fi
If myVariable = 0, the return code is 0
If myVariable > 0, the return code is 1
If myVariable is not an integer, the return code is 2
I use the following (for integers):
## ##### constants
##
## __TRUE - true (0)
## __FALSE - false (1)
##
typeset -r __TRUE=0
typeset -r __FALSE=1
## --------------------------------------
## isNumber
## check if a value is an integer
## usage: isNumber testValue
## returns: ${__TRUE} - testValue is a number else not
##
function isNumber {
typeset TESTVAR="$(echo "$1" | sed 's/[0-9]*//g' )"
[ "${TESTVAR}"x = ""x ] && return ${__TRUE} || return ${__FALSE}
}
isNumber $1
if [ $? -eq ${__TRUE} ] ; then
print "is a number"
fi