import java.util.*;
public class HelloWorld{
public static void main(String []args){
HashMap<Integer,String> h = new HashMap<Integer,String>();
h.put(100,"Hola");
h.put(101,"Hello");
h.put(102,"light");
System.out.println(h); // {100=Hola, 101=Hello, 102=light}
Set s = h.entrySet();
System.out.println(s); // [100=Hola, 101=Hello, 102=light]
for(Map.Entry<Integer,String> ent : s)
{
System.out.println("Key=" + ent.getKey() + " Value=" + ent.getValue());
}
}
}
Compile error
HelloWorld.java:13: error: incompatible types: Object cannot be converted to Entry<Integer,String>
for(Map.Entry<Integer,String> ent : s)
^
I am trying to print key-value pair for each entry type object in the Set s. But it gives compile time error shown above. But code works fine if I replace "s" with " h.entrySet()" and loops fine..How does using reference to hold "h.entrySet()" cause compile error ?
The line
Set s = h.entrySet();
should be
Set<Map.Entry<Integer,String>> s = h.entrySet();
because for each loop below doesn't know what type of Set s is ?
This code works:
import java.util.*;
public class HelloWorld{
public static void main(String []args){
HashMap<Integer,String> h = new HashMap<Integer,String>();
h.put(100,"Hola");
h.put(101,"Hello");
h.put(102,"light");
System.out.println(h); // {100=Hola, 101=Hello, 102=light}
Set<Map.Entry<Integer,String>> s = h.entrySet();
System.out.println(s); // [100=Hola, 101=Hello, 102=light]
for(Map.Entry<Integer,String> ent : s)
{
System.out.println("Key=" + ent.getKey() + " Value=" + ent.getValue());
}
}
}
Whenever you see
incompatible types: Object cannot be converted to.. error
it means JVM is trying to covert Object type to some other type and it leads to compilation error . Here it's happening in the for loop.
Related
When using the Alloy API to perform parsing on the following string:
Module mod = CompUtil.parseEverything_fromString("run {} for 5")
I receive the following error:
Fatal error:
Parser Exception
at edu.mit.csail.sdg.alloy4compiler.parser.CompParser.alloy_parseStream(CompParser.java:2260)
at edu.mit.csail.sdg.alloy4compiler.parser.CompUtil.parseRecursively(CompUtil.java:178)
at edu.mit.csail.sdg.alloy4compiler.parser.CompUtil.parseEverything_fromFile(CompUtil.java:280)
at edu.mit.csail.sdg.alloy4compiler.parser.CompUtil.parseEverything_fromString(CompUtil.java:333)
at edu.mit.csail.sdg.alloy4compiler.parser.CompUtil$parseEverything_fromString.call(Unknown Source)
at org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.callsite.CallSiteArray.defaultCall(CallSiteArray.java:47)
at org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.callsite.AbstractCallSite.call(AbstractCallSite.java:116)
at org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.callsite.AbstractCallSite.call(AbstractCallSite.java:136)
at MyOM.MyOMPlugin.Modularize(MyOMPlugin.groovy:107)
...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
class file:
package MyOM
class MyOMPlugin extends Plugin{
void Modularize() throws Err{
//line 107 is the only line in the method and is below
Module mod = CompUtil.parseEverything_fromString("run {} for 5")
}
}
I am performing this task in a groovy class file within a groovy project. The code works fine until I run it in conjunction with the plugin I am using.
EDIT:
The parse function is what causes the parse exception and the code for that method is included below for reference:
#Override public Symbol parse() throws java.lang.Exception {
int act; // current action code
Symbol lhs_sym = null; // the Symbol/stack element returned by a reduce
short handle_size, lhs_sym_num; // information about production being reduced with
boolean logging = "yes".equals(System.getProperty("debug"));
production_tab = production_table();
action_tab = action_table();
reduce_tab = reduce_table();
init_actions();
user_init();
// start
cur_token = scan();
stack.removeAllElements();
stack.push(getSymbolFactory().startSymbol("START", 0, start_state()));
tos = 0;
for (_done_parsing = false; !_done_parsing; ) {
act = get_action(((Symbol)stack.peek()).parse_state, cur_token.sym);
if (act > 0) { // "shift"; thus, we shift to the encoded state by pushing it on the stack
if (logging) System.out.println("shift " + cur_token.sym);
cur_token.parse_state = act-1;
stack.push(cur_token);
tos++;
cur_token = scan();
} else if (act<0) { // "reduce"
if (logging) System.out.println("reduce " + ((-act)-1));
lhs_sym = do_action((-act)-1, this, stack, tos);
lhs_sym_num = production_tab[(-act)-1][0];
handle_size = production_tab[(-act)-1][1];
for (int i = 0; i < handle_size; i++) { stack.pop(); tos--; }
act = get_reduce(((Symbol)stack.peek()).parse_state, lhs_sym_num);
lhs_sym.parse_state = act;
stack.push(lhs_sym);
tos++;
} else { // "error"
if (logging) System.out.println("error");
syntax_error(cur_token);
done_parsing();
}
}
return lhs_sym;
}
I have a script which exports excel worksheets to csv, and I am attempting to escape commas, quotes and the like. I have created a static method that encodes the value of the cell being accessed. This method references a static variable which stores a Pattern.compile() value.
I have tried using def rxquote within the method but this gives me a different error stating that using static modifier before declaring my rxquote variable is illegal. Code is below followed by error message.
#!/usr/bin/env groovy
#Grab(group = 'org.apache.poi', module = 'poi', version = '4.1.0')
#Grab(group = 'org.apache.poi', module = 'poi-ooxml', version = '4.1.0')
import java.util.regex.*
import org.apache.poi.xssf.usermodel.XSSFWorkbook
import org.apache.poi.ss.usermodel.*
static Pattern rxquote = Pattern.compile("\"")
static private String encodeValue(String value) {
boolean needQuotes = false;
if ( value.indexOf(',') != -1 || value.indexOf('"') != -1 ||
value.indexOf('\n') != -1 || value.indexOf('\r') != -1 ){
needQuotes = true;
}
Matcher m = rxquote.matcher(value)
if ( m.find() ) {
needQuotes = true
value = m.replaceAll("\"\"")
}
if ( needQuotes ) {
return "\"" + value + "\""
}
else return value;
}
//for(){
// ... export csv code (which works on its own)
//}
Error message on compile:
Apparent variable 'rxquote' was found in a static scope but doesn't refer to a local variable, static field or class. Possible causes:
You attempted to reference a variable in the binding or an instance variable from a static context.
You misspelled a classname or statically imported field. Please check the spelling.
You attempted to use a method 'rxquote' but left out brackets in a place not allowed by the grammar.
# line 27, column 17.
Matcher m = rxquote.matcher(value);
^
I've tried researching the issue and have found several similar questions here, but none of the solutions appear to apply to this situation as far as I can tell. I expected a static declaration of the variable to avoid this problem, but it seems there's something I'm missing.
you can't declare static variable in groovy script.
it's allowed only in groovy/java class.
error does not correspond to situation.
should be : Modifier 'static' not allowed here.
as workaround for static variables you can use some class:
class Const{
static String bar = 'test'
}
static private String foo() {
return Const.bar
}
foo()
I need to retrieve the value from an annotation such as this one that uses a string constant:
#Component(property = Constants.SERVICE_RANKING + ":Integer=10")
public class NyServiceImpl implements MyService {
But I am getting a kind of K_UNKNOWN and the doc says "the value is an expression that would need to be further analyzed to determine its kind". My question then is how do I perform this analysis? I could even manage to accept getting the plain source text value in this case.
The other answer looks basically OK, but let me suggest a way to avoid using the internal class org.eclipse.jdt.internal.core.Annotation and its method findNode():
ISourceRange range = annotation.getSourceRange();
ASTNode annNode = org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.NodeFinder.perform(cu, range);
From here on you should be safe, using DOM API throughout.
Googling differently I found a way to resolve the expression. Still open to other suggestions if any. For those who might be interested, here is a snippet of code:
if (valueKind == IMemberValuePair.K_UNKNOWN) {
Annotation ann = (Annotation)annotation;
CompilationUnit cu = getAST(ann.getCompilationUnit());
ASTNode annNode = ann.findNode(cu);
NormalAnnotation na = (NormalAnnotation)annNode;
List<?> naValues = na.values();
Optional<?> optMvp = naValues.stream()
.filter(val-> ((MemberValuePair)val).getName().getIdentifier().equals(PROPERTY))
.findAny();
if (optMvp.isPresent()) {
MemberValuePair pair = (MemberValuePair)optMvp.get();
if (pair.getValue() instanceof ArrayInitializer) {
ArrayInitializer ai = (ArrayInitializer)pair.getValue();
for (Object exprObj : ai.expressions()) {
Expression expr = (Expression)exprObj;
String propValue = (String)expr.resolveConstantExpressionValue();
if (propValue.startsWith(Constants.SERVICE_RANKING)) {
return true;
}
}
}
else {
Expression expr = pair.getValue();
String propValue = (String)expr.resolveConstantExpressionValue();
if (propValue.startsWith(Constants.SERVICE_RANKING)) {
return true;
}
}
}
//report error
}
private CompilationUnit getAST(ICompilationUnit compUnit) {
final ASTParser parser = ASTParser.newParser(AST.JLS8);
parser.setKind(ASTParser.K_COMPILATION_UNIT);
parser.setSource(compUnit);
parser.setResolveBindings(true); // we need bindings later on
CompilationUnit unit = (CompilationUnit)parser.createAST(null);
return unit;
}
Using Antlr 4 I have a situation I am not sure how to resolve. I originally asked the question at https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/antlr-discussion/1yxxxAvU678 on the Antlr discussion forum. But that forum does not seem to get a lot of traffic, so I am asking again here.
I have the following grammar:
expression
: ...
| path
;
path
: ...
| dotIdentifierSequence
;
dotIdentifierSequence
: identifier (DOT identifier)*
;
The concern here is that dotIdentifierSequence can mean a number of things semantically, and not all of them are "paths". But at the moment they are all recognized as paths in the parse tree and then I need to handle them specially in my visitor.
But what I'd really like is a way to express the dotIdentifierSequence usages that are not paths into the expression rule rather than in the path rule, and still have dotIdentifierSequence in path to handle path usages.
To be clear, a dotIdentifierSequence might be any of the following:
A path - this is a SQL-like grammar and a path expression would be like a table or column reference in SQL, e.g. a.b.c
A Java class name - e.g. com.acme.SomeJavaType
A static Java field reference - e.g. com.acme.SomeJavaType.SOME_FIELD
A Java enum value reference - e.g. com.acme.Gender.MALE
The idea is that during visitation "dotIdentifierSequence as a path" resolves as a very different type from the other usages.
Any idea how I can do this?
The issue here is that you're trying to make a distinction between "paths" while being created in the parser. Constructing paths inside the lexer would be easier (pseudo code follows):
grammar T;
tokens {
JAVA_TYPE_PATH,
JAVA_FIELD_PATH
}
// parser rules
PATH
: IDENTIFIER ('.' IDENTIFIER)*
{
String s = getText();
if (s is a Java class) {
setType(JAVA_TYPE_PATH);
} else if (s is a Java field) {
setType(JAVA_FIELD_PATH);
}
}
;
fragment IDENTIFIER : [a-zA-Z_] [a-zA-Z_0-9]*;
and then in the parser you would do:
expression
: JAVA_TYPE_PATH #javaTypeExpression
| JAVA_FIELD_PATH #javaFieldExpression
| PATH #pathExpression
;
But then, of course, input like this java./*comment*/lang.String would be tokenized wrongly.
Handling it all in the parser would mean manually looking ahead in the token stream and checking if either a Java type, or field exists.
A quick demo:
grammar T;
#parser::members {
String getPathAhead() {
Token token = _input.LT(1);
if (token.getType() != IDENTIFIER) {
return null;
}
StringBuilder builder = new StringBuilder(token.getText());
// Try to collect ('.' IDENTIFIER)*
for (int stepsAhead = 2; ; stepsAhead += 2) {
Token expectedDot = _input.LT(stepsAhead);
Token expectedIdentifier = _input.LT(stepsAhead + 1);
if (expectedDot.getType() != DOT || expectedIdentifier.getType() != IDENTIFIER) {
break;
}
builder.append('.').append(expectedIdentifier.getText());
}
return builder.toString();
}
boolean javaTypeAhead() {
String path = getPathAhead();
if (path == null) {
return false;
}
try {
return Class.forName(path) != null;
} catch (Exception e) {
return false;
}
}
boolean javaFieldAhead() {
String path = getPathAhead();
if (path == null || !path.contains(".")) {
return false;
}
int lastDot = path.lastIndexOf('.');
String typeName = path.substring(0, lastDot);
String fieldName = path.substring(lastDot + 1);
try {
Class<?> clazz = Class.forName(typeName);
return clazz.getField(fieldName) != null;
} catch (Exception e) {
return false;
}
}
}
expression
: {javaTypeAhead()}? path #javaTypeExpression
| {javaFieldAhead()}? path #javaFieldExpression
| path #pathExpression
;
path
: dotIdentifierSequence
;
dotIdentifierSequence
: IDENTIFIER (DOT IDENTIFIER)*
;
IDENTIFIER
: [a-zA-Z_] [a-zA-Z_0-9]*
;
DOT
: '.'
;
which can be tested with the following class:
package tl.antlr4;
import org.antlr.v4.runtime.ANTLRInputStream;
import org.antlr.v4.runtime.CommonTokenStream;
import org.antlr.v4.runtime.misc.NotNull;
import org.antlr.v4.runtime.tree.ParseTreeWalker;
public class Main {
public static void main(String[] args) {
String[] tests = {
"mu",
"tl.antlr4.The",
"java.lang.String",
"foo.bar.Baz",
"tl.antlr4.The.answer",
"tl.antlr4.The.ANSWER"
};
for (String test : tests) {
TLexer lexer = new TLexer(new ANTLRInputStream(test));
TParser parser = new TParser(new CommonTokenStream(lexer));
ParseTreeWalker.DEFAULT.walk(new TestListener(), parser.expression());
}
}
}
class TestListener extends TBaseListener {
#Override
public void enterJavaTypeExpression(#NotNull TParser.JavaTypeExpressionContext ctx) {
System.out.println("JavaTypeExpression -> " + ctx.getText());
}
#Override
public void enterJavaFieldExpression(#NotNull TParser.JavaFieldExpressionContext ctx) {
System.out.println("JavaFieldExpression -> " + ctx.getText());
}
#Override
public void enterPathExpression(#NotNull TParser.PathExpressionContext ctx) {
System.out.println("PathExpression -> " + ctx.getText());
}
}
class The {
public static final int ANSWER = 42;
}
which would print the following to the console:
PathExpression -> mu
JavaTypeExpression -> tl.antlr4.The
JavaTypeExpression -> java.lang.String
PathExpression -> foo.bar.Baz
PathExpression -> tl.antlr4.The.answer
JavaFieldExpression -> tl.antlr4.The.ANSWER
I'm creating an object at runtime using reflection emit. I successfully created the fields, properties and get set methods.
Now I want to add a method. For the sake of simplicity let's say the method just returns a random number. How do I define the method body?
EDIT:
Yes, I've been looking at the msdn documentation along with other references and I'm starting to get my head wrapped around this stuff.
I see how the example above is adding and/or multplying, but what if my method is doing other stuff. How do I define that "stuff"
Suppose I was generating the class below dynamically, how would I create the body of GetDetails() method?
class TestClass
{
public string Name { get; set; }
public int Size { get; set; }
public TestClass()
{
}
public TestClass(string Name, int Size)
{
this.Name = Name;
this.Size = Size;
}
public string GetDetails()
{
string Details = "Name = " + this.Name + ", Size = " + this.Size.ToString();
return Details;
}
}
You use a MethodBuilder to define methods. To define the method body, you call GetILGenerator() to get an ILGenerator, and then call the Emit methods to emit individual IL instructions. There is an example on the MSDN documentation for MethodBuilder, and you can find other examples of how to use reflection emit on the Using Reflection Emit page:
public static void AddMethodDynamically(TypeBuilder myTypeBld,
string mthdName,
Type[] mthdParams,
Type returnType,
string mthdAction)
{
MethodBuilder myMthdBld = myTypeBld.DefineMethod(
mthdName,
MethodAttributes.Public |
MethodAttributes.Static,
returnType,
mthdParams);
ILGenerator ILout = myMthdBld.GetILGenerator();
int numParams = mthdParams.Length;
for (byte x = 0; x < numParams; x++)
{
ILout.Emit(OpCodes.Ldarg_S, x);
}
if (numParams > 1)
{
for (int y = 0; y < (numParams - 1); y++)
{
switch (mthdAction)
{
case "A": ILout.Emit(OpCodes.Add);
break;
case "M": ILout.Emit(OpCodes.Mul);
break;
default: ILout.Emit(OpCodes.Add);
break;
}
}
}
ILout.Emit(OpCodes.Ret);
}
It sounds like you're looking for resources on writing MSIL. One important resource is the OpCodes class, which has a member for every IL instruction. The documentation describes how each instruction works. Another important resource is either Ildasm or Reflector. These will let you see the IL for compiled code, which will help you understand what IL you want to write. Running your GetDetailsMethod through Reflector and setting the language to IL yields:
.method public hidebysig instance string GetDetails() cil managed
{
.maxstack 4
.locals init (
[0] string Details,
[1] string CS$1$0000,
[2] int32 CS$0$0001)
L_0000: nop
L_0001: ldstr "Name = "
L_0006: ldarg.0
L_0007: call instance string ConsoleApplication1.TestClass::get_Name()
L_000c: ldstr ", Size = "
L_0011: ldarg.0
L_0012: call instance int32 ConsoleApplication1.TestClass::get_Size()
L_0017: stloc.2
L_0018: ldloca.s CS$0$0001
L_001a: call instance string [mscorlib]System.Int32::ToString()
L_001f: call string [mscorlib]System.String::Concat(string, string, string, string)
L_0024: stloc.0
L_0025: ldloc.0
L_0026: stloc.1
L_0027: br.s L_0029
L_0029: ldloc.1
L_002a: ret
}
To generate a method like that dynamically, you will need to call ILGenerator.Emit for each instruction:
ilGen.Emit(OpCodes.Nop);
ilGen.Emit(OpCodes.Ldstr, "Name = ");
ilGen.Emit(OpCodes.Ldarg_0);
ilGen.Emit(OpCodes.Call, nameProperty.GetGetMethod());
// etc..
You may also want to look for introductions to MSIL, such as this one: Introduction to IL Assembly Language.