I am confused how to properly define viewport and viewbox in SVG file to convey shapes that have real world physical units.
I am mapping my AutoCAD design to a SVG file. The units in my AutoCAD file are defined in millimeters (mm). Image below shows my AutoCAD design. The orange box (16mm x 9mm) are my boundaries for visible part of the SVG file, thus anything outside the orange box will get cut off. My end application requires a PNG image that is a specific resolution, 1920x1080. (Notice how the aspect ratio is the same).
In my SVG file, all shapes (elements) are defined without units, however I know the values are in millimeters in the physical world. For example, below is an example of a circle. The radius of the circle is 0.474mm as set in the AutoCAD file.
<circle cx="1.22996130982" cy="2.27139057943" r="0.474" />
My question is, how do I properly define the viewport and viewbox in my SVG file? How do I properly define the viewport/viewbox such that the physical units in real world get scaled to fit in my desired image resolution?
I used the following method below to define my viewport/viewbox. However, this approach did not work. The resulting SVG image was a canvas of 1920x1080 however all my shapes were very tiny and it did NOT cut off the shapes desired outside the orange boundary box.
<svg width="1920px" height="1080px" viewbox="0 0 16mm 9mm">
<circle cx="1.22996130982" cy="2.27139057943" r="0.474" />
<!-- Other shapes in SVG here-->
</svg>
Related
I am importing an SVG using the SVGLoader and turning each path into a mesh that is then put into a group. When I do so, the group is much larger than I would like it to be. Rather than scaling, I'd like to import it at the correct size to begin with. When I change the width and height attributes on the SVG: <svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="25" height="25"> nothing changes with respect to the size of the rendered meshes. I haven't seen anything actually describing how SVG sizes are determined by the loader. Is it a viewbox? Is there something special that has to be done?
In your 3d world, you can only change the size of your object by Object3D.scale.set(x, y, z),and the x, y, z value determine the size of your mesh in you 3d world. When you change the width and height attributes on the SVG, you can only change the resolution but not the size
I have a couple of SVG images that I want to paste together to make a big graphic.
First, let me present you with my problem:
This is one of the symbols, placed in a grid. The grid is, for convenience, with unit-less 100 distance from line to line.
If I render it to pdf, it looks like this instead:
Those symbols have a completely wrong size for the grid (They are much larger, mostly) and they are badly positioned if I use them raw.
So my treatment is, I scale them and position them correctly in relation to the grid, then I make a rectangle around them that encompasses them completely and makes the symbol-handling easier.
That rectangle is perfectly fitting to my grid. In my case, for this symbol, it is a rectangle encompassing the six squares around the symbol. I did this, because the symbol can be rotated by the user and the rotation is done from symbol point of view; any transform after the rotation is from the rotated point of view. So I made an attempt to de-couple the transformations by wrapping them.
Finally, I move the rectangle to a user-defined place and rotate it as the user wants to have it. So far, so well, it was extensively tested in google chrome and works reliably. In Google Chrome.
Now I wanted to translate it to pdf for printing. And after conversion, the symbol is placed in the wrong position.
I am guessing (as I made several tests) that the error is somewhere in my header.
Could someone of you please check the headers that I add and tell me if and where I did something wrong? For example there is a view box starting at -100, otherwise the symbol would be cut and wrongly placed. Is there another way to "rectangularize" any arbitrary symbol? Or is it generally the wrong way to do these kinds of things?
Here are the changes that I added around the svg symbol code. Innermost changes are applied first.
<!-- move the rectangle to the right place and rotate it as the user wishes-->
<g transform="translate(300.0, 400.0) rotate(0,150.0, 50.0) ">
<!-- a rectangle around the symbol, perfectly fitting to the grid-->
<svg x="0" y="0" width="300.0" height="200.0" version = '2.0'
xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="-100.0 0 300.0 200.0">
<!-- scaled to correct size, placed inside the grid as it should be -->
<g transform = "translate(-10.000, 73.614) scale(0.229,0.229)" >
<!-- original symbol, wrong size -->
<svg width="523" height="230" version = '2.0' xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"
viewBox="0 0 523 230">
.... lots of svg paths here ...
</svg>
</g>
</svg>
</g>
I need some help to figure out how I can adjust the resizing of an SVG graphic when displayed on my web page.
Here are joined 2 screenshots of the graphics, one shows the graphics on a desktop wide screen, and the other on a smartphone
My problem is the graphics are too small on the smartphone. How can I make it bigger? I didn't anything about the responsiveness of this graphics, just the plain SVG in my web page. So I guess something can be made but I don't know what exactly.
Here is the beginning of the SVG graphics:
<svg viewbox="0 0 1920 632" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" preserveAspectRatio="xMidYMid meet">
<title>graphics</title>
<g style="isolation:isolate">
<g data-name="before animation starts" id="0482fa28-2c72-43bc-8627-b57f09f318d3">
<path id="main-oval" class="main-oval" d="M1354.63,260.62C1338.38,142.2,1144.68,71,922,101.54c-109.4,15-205.35,51.8-272.82,99.38-69.92,49.26-109.23,110-101,170.29,16.31,118.42,210,189.59,432.62,159.07,110.79-15.17,207.86-52.73,275.44-101.15C1324.59,380.18,1362.8,320.12,1354.63,260.62Z" data-name="oval"></path>...
Thanks
Attribute names in SVG are case-sensitive. So viewbox should be viewBox.
It is possible that there are other things wring, but I can't tell without seeing the complete SVG file.
Because your SVG has a viewBox attribute without a width and height attribute it is by default responsive and will scale to fit it's parent container.
In the case of your mobile view, it is the parent container that is restricting the size rather than anything in your SVG. Try inspecting the width, margin and padding of the parent container to ensure it is 100% wide and your SVG will scale to suit.
If the SVG is still not quite legible after that you will need to modify the graphic using CSS media queries to scale and transform specific elements. That is beyond the scope of the question so I won't go into it here.
My ultimate goal is to export designs created in mobile apps as vector graphics. Say I have a list of points of corners of shapes and the respective color that goes inside each shape and this design is being displayed on a mobile app (iOS and Android because cocos2d-x is being used). Is it possible to convert this information into a vector file (SVG file which is essentially an XML file)?
SVG contains a path element that stores the lines that make up a shape's path. The d attribute stores a path string, and the style attribute stores the path's styling, such as stroke and fill. To export a shape to SVG there are several things you should care about:
The size of the SVG in pixels (the width and height attributes).
Example:<svg width='640px' height='640px'
The size of the shape in pixels (the viewBox attribute: left, right, width, height).
Example:viewBox='0 0 100 100'
The color used to stroke the shape and the stroke width.
Example:style='stroke:red;stroke-width:1px' or style='stroke:none;'
The color used to fill each shape.
Example:style='fill:blue;' or style='fill:none;'
The shape of the path.
Example:d='M10 10L20 20 L30 10Z'
Each path is divided into commands. The M command moves the pen,
the L command draws to a new position, and the Z command closes the shape.
There can be any number of paths in a single SVG file.
Example SVG file:
<svg width='640px' height='640px' viewBox='0 0 100 100'
xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'>
<path style='stroke:red;fill:none' d='M10 10L20 20 L30 10Z'/>
</svg>
Q: How can I use the viewBox coordinate system whilst still filling the viewPort completely and preserving aspect ratio?
I'm new to svg programming, so hopefully I'm just mis-understanding a basic concept.
I want to create an interactive & responsive map with , based on a background image that the user uploads.
Here's the basic example I'm trying to get to work (JSFiddle):
<svg version="1.1"
xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"
xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"
width="200px"
height="400px"
preserveAspectRatio="xMidYMid meet"
style="border: 1px solid black;">
<image x="0" y="0" width="100%" height="100%"
preserveAspectRatio="xMidYMid meet"
xlink:href="http://www.bized.co.uk/sites/bized/modules/bized_cb_navigation/images/floorplan_info.gif">
</image>
</svg>
This works nicely. since however the viewPort changes, the image always fills it whilst maintaining its aspect ratio. (See wide-Screen example)
Next I add a coordinate system viewBox="0 0 100 100":
the wide-screen view still fills nicely
but the vertical-screen view now does not fill the viewPort anymore
If you take a different image that is wider than tall, then the wide-screen view breaks, and the vertical-screen view still works.
When I inspect the SVG in Chrome DOM Element inspector, for the first two examples without using viewBox="0 0 100 100" The svg element has the same size as the viewPort. Once the viewBox attribute is added, the element becomes a square with sides equal to the lesser of the viewPort's sides.
This behavior is explained in this Tutorial as:
"... the view box is scaled according to the smaller of the two aspect ratios..."
I need the viewBox attribute so that I can zoom and pan on the image within the viewPort.
This is because you effectively have two competing viewBox transformations.
Because of your square viewBox, you are fitting the image into a square, and then fitting the square into your SVG rectangle.
If you make your SVG viewBox the same dimensions as your image (or the same aspect ratio will do), then the problem will be resolved.
viewBox="0 0 155 210"
http://jsfiddle.net/2qexypLs/15/
http://jsfiddle.net/2qexypLs/16/
My current solution is to use JavaScript to dynamically set the viewBox width and height values to the same value as svg width and height values. That way the aspect ratio for x and y are the same and the fill returns to 100% of viewPort. (JsFiddle)
For the interactive elements layer of the map I have a separate coordinate system that is mapped to the background image scaling ratio when the svg viewPort is defined. That means all coordinates need to be recalculated on svg define/change width/height event.
After this first re-calculation, the map can be zoomed and panned by changing the viewBox parameters without any further calculations.