Well basically I want to upgrade MathJax in my site from version 2.5 to version 2.6. I have installed a copy of the 2.6 version in the server and then I am trying to call MathJaX linking it to the server. However, I get an upleasant message that the server cannot see the local.js file. It does the upgrade to 2.6 but it calls it from the cdn. Also, the equations are not stable. That is, if someone clicks on them well they go up and down for a while.
The configuration looks like this:
<script type="text/javascript" src="http://cdn.mathjax.org/mathjax
2.6-latest/MathJax.js?config=TeX-AMS_HTML,
https://myserver.com/MathJax/config/local/local.js">
In the mean while, the old version of 2.5 is still on board the server. Should I delete this? If I switch back to 2.5 version then everything is OK.
Related
We upgraded our Oracle DB and oracle client from 12.1 to 19.10.
Our application server have below setup
OS is Linux
Python version is 2.7.5 and there is no plan to upgrade the python version yet
cx_Oracle library version is 5.3
A quick test shows the application works fine but I am wondering if I need to upgrade the cx_Oracle library? Does it have a support expiry date? I tried to google it, read the information on its Github page but can't find any statement that answers my question.
This combination hasn't been tested. But since the Oracle Client libraries keep compatibility it is likely to work, subject to whatever underlaying enforced changes have been made to the Oracle libraries, perhaps to drop unsupported TLS versions or whatever has occurred in the 8 years since 12.1 was released that I don't know about. You application testing should be the final confirmation.
You should definitely set a goal to update to Python 3 so you can get the latest cx_Oracle version.
I'm migrating from a HD to an SSD. I was using TortoiseSVN 1.7 on the HD for a project that has multiple coders using the same repository.
I installed TSVN 1.8 on the SSD, and am attempting to use it with the project's old-format working copy. It asks me to upgrade the format to 1.8, but I'm wondering if that permanent change is going to make its way back into the repository when I do my next checkin, and if that is going to cause problems for other coders not using the new format.
Thank you.
No. Internal local changes of WC structure doesn't reflected in remote repository: there are only a few compatibility issues between server- and client-side versions of SVN
LazyBadger is correct but a few more details are worth noting:
Be aware of the distinction of the SVN server vs the SVN client; TSVN is a client, existing separately on the machine of each developer. Thus, this question is addressing upgrading a client specifically.
When it asks you to upgrade the format to 1.8, it is talking about the infrastructure of your working copy, the way it stores and manages files on your box. That infrastructure is local to your machine; it is not reflected on the server.
However, it is not a general rule that you can always upgrade a client and remain compatible, but moving from TSVN 1.7 to TSVN 1.8 does, in fact, maintain compatibility.
Ultimately to answer this question each time you are considering an upgrade, have a look at the TortoiseSVN release notes--for 1.8 they are here. In there you will see that it specifically states that "Older clients and servers interoperate transparently with 1.8 servers and clients."
Suppose my extension is version 1.0. I write a new feature and release 1.1. Then I quickly realize I've shipped a bug, fix it, and release 1.2.
Now suppose a user with 1.0 is offline until after 1.2 is released.
Will they update to 1.2 or to 1.1?
Do users get updated to the latest version, or to the next version from the one they have?
Users always get the latest version. So you’ll have to integrate any update code for 1.1 in 1.2 as well.
Every few hours, the browser checks whether any installed extensions or apps have an update URL. For each one, it makes a request to that URL looking for an update manifest XML file. If the update manifest mentions a version that is more recent than what's installed, the browser downloads and installs the new version.
— http://developer.chrome.com/extensions/autoupdate.html
I have Awesomium SDK 1.6.6 installed and i want to upgrade it to the 1.7 candidate how could i do that. because when i downloaded the 1.7 i find it is only consists of some files and no setup file included (like the 1.6 one)
We have not created an installer for the Release Candidates of version 1.7. RCs are not stable releases. There will be one again when 1.7 goes stable and 1.6.6 installations will then be able to automatically upgrade to 1.7.
Are you looking to use the .NET wrappers? If so, you should be able to download and extract the files anywhere, then in your project, just add references to Awesomium.Core.dll and either Awesomium.Windows.Forms.dll or Awesomium.Windows.Controls.dll, depending on whether you're using Winforms or WPF. The dlls are located in awesomium_1_7_rc3_v3_sdk_win\wrappers\AwesomiumNET\Assemblies\ within the archive.
I believe the setup.exe you're expecting to see is only used for extracting the files to a specific location and providing you with some helpful links in your start menu, so you aren't missing much by not having it.
Is it possible to use CCTray 1.2 to access older Cruise Control .Net 1.0? I was thinking it should be possible to use the "Supply custom HTTP URL" option, but I don't know how to configure it.
I would think it is possible as 1.3 and 1.4 intermingled quite nice. I think the URL form you are looking for is http://yourwebhost/ccnet at least that is what works in 1.3 and 1.4 I will point out 1.4.3 should be out soon, and with all of the bug fixes and added functionality 1.4.3 would be a good upgrade target if you are thinking of going that way, then you could get everything back on the same version.