Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
Hi what is the correct way to get two different web sites to talk to each other within Azure.
Today we tried to just make them talk through their Rest Api's but after 1000 requests we got locked out from the web site our calling web site were calling.
We know we can use a service bus to make them talk. But we would really like to be able to use the rest api:s.
Are there limitations in how much a web site can call another web site within azure?
There are several limits on websites, depending on what type you are using (free, shared, basic, standard)
With Free and Shared, you are limited on the CPU usage (60 minutes/day and 240 minutes/day) but also just for 2.5 minutes per 5 minutes. So when doing a lot of requests without a pause, you will run into this.
Another restriction on free websites is the data limit of 165 MB.
With Basic and Standard you have your own machine, so these restrictions don't apply
http://azure.microsoft.com/nl-nl/documentation/articles/azure-subscription-service-limits/#websiteslimits
Related
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 4 years ago.
Improve this question
Is there a free website hosting, sort of like google sites, but where I can upload my own html files and css?
github pages is great for static websites. If you want to run a dynamic website then you could try pythonanywhere or amazon aws, if you are willing to spend a little bit of money.
Alternatively if you want to set up your own server using either Node/Ruby/Java/PHP/Python/Go, you may try Heroku. It does come with a free plan.
I agree GitHub can host static webpages but for dynamic sites implementing JS, Ruby on Rails there are other paid web hosting domains.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 5 years ago.
Improve this question
At the moment we are a small development team of 2. All our software is used inhouse. Currently staff just walk to our desk when they want new software developed or when they want new features added to existing software, or when bugs arise.
I am looking for a better management process of this. Do I get staff to send an email instead and then that can be designated to a developer. Or is there a simple software app out there that could help?
I want a simple method for doing this as the staff are unlikely to use something if too time consuming or complex. They find it too easy to approach a developer personally!
Anything to recommend please?
One option is to use JIRA. It has a feature where emails sent to a certain address can get turned in to backlog items (using the email subject line as the title).
Keep it as it is for now: face-to-face communication is always better than using any piece of software...
It will be only when you will grow to more developers that you will really need such software: from online or cloud based (ie Zimbra) to VCSs (version control systems) hosted on your machines.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
I want to write a web application that needs a websocket server.
I want to host this websocket server on some famous web hosting provider (such as 1&1 by example).
Which web hosting provider should I use?
If you want to use a websocket server which you can start and stop at will I would much rather recommend a cloud solution. It's cheap and lets you interact with the server directly, which is most likely impossible with more traditional hosting providers. I've only used Amazon Web Services and Google App Engine myself, they both have a free tier which you can use to build and test your websocket application. There are many more providers, also have a look at PaaS services like Nodejitsu. It all depends on what specific technologies you want to use I guess.
(note: AWS lets you SSH into your instance and you can use any platform/technology you want while GAE is web based and limited to Go, Java and Python. It doesn't mean AWS is better, again it depends on your case.)
You can use WebSockets for your .NET apps with GearHost at www.gearhost.com. It's free and gives you 100 free CloudSites and 100 free databases.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
I'd like a system where I can manage my LAMP server. It is a real server, so it isnt a VPS. But apart from everyone else online, I dont want to sell space on it. I just want to manage it for my own purpose.
So I can change settings on the fly without accessing the Shell.
I would of course like it to be an active, either open source or free software.
Web UI is also a requirement.
As any configuration tool on various web hotels, with possibility to configure only for one mashine, and no virtual spaces or such.
Would be great, as after tons of googling I came to the conclusion that there are tons of systems and they all are too advanced or just look aweful and seem to complex.
My goals.
Manage domains,
Manage emails for domains,
Manage Apache (possibly vhosts and such)
Manage MySQL (could use phpmyadmin)
Manage logs and similar
Manage SVN (if possible)
Manage FTP
And such features, not too advanced stuff.
Much appriciated if you know any good systems of such caliber. Thanks.
webmin (http://www.webmin.com/) might be what you're looking for.
Another could be http://isp-control.net/
And: http://www.syscp.org/
And again: http://www.ispconfig.org/
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
So,
We need to keep passwords to different SCM, DBs, etc., etc. -- it's all for the development purposes and needs to be shared between engineers. However, different people work on different projects, so we need to be able to keep some access rights / roles there. Anything you are using? Security and safety of this storage is obviously #1 priority, the #2 is actual features I listed above.
How do you store / share this information?
Thanks!
Different applications with different passwords is always a problem. So what we are using is domain authentication to everything: DB, SCM, etc.
The most important tool is the Project Management Tool. Again access to projects is based on the domain accounts. There we keep everything related to a project, even secure information. Safety is achieved through regular backup. Security can be a bit low in this case, though, depending of the tool used...