I'm having issues with an ASP page that needs to connect to Access. I am getting the following error message:
Provider cannot be found. It may not be properly installed.
I have researched and googled the solution but it does not work. I have tried to change the application pool settings to Classic ASP and allow to use 32 bit applications, but when I switch it from 64 bit to 32 bit, the application pool automatically stops and I get an 503 error and the webpage does not show up. If I switch it back to 64 bit I get my original error.
Here is the connection string:
set conn=Server.CreateObject("ADODB.Connection")
conn.provider="Microsoft.Jet.OLEDB.4.0;"
conn.open server.mappath("databases/Phone_Directory.mdb")
Related
I think this topic a lot of ppl post it already. I also look for lot of thread in stack overflow and some ibm page. They do give some comment of how to solve this problem. But i still facing the same problem, it still give this error.
Case start :
Actually one of my customer, they have facing this error during running on webpages and also notes ~
error 500 http web server: command not handled exception
Action taken but not solve:
The user id signing/creating the XPages allowed to run XPages in the
server document?
Do project clean, build automatically on designer
Do testing on creating new xpages page with simple lable " hello world" , this one can run successfully only.
Try to reload the http server by
tell http quit
load http
After do this the problem still same give the same error. May i know got any other way to solve it?
"Unresolved compilation errors: java.lang.String" points to a failed install as here. A class in java.lang or java.util should always be resolved. Ensure all services and any processes for Notes / Domino are stopped before the relevant install, jar files can get locked once used. Xpages can't load, Error 500; java.util cannot be resolved
Switch on "Display XPage runtime error page" in application's XSP Properties then you'll see a detailed error message which probably will lead you to the issue:
I frequently get this error when there is a mismatch/problem with access rights or the user login has expired and the app/database doesn't redirect to the login page. I suggest you double check the security basics first. (Might also explain why the app works locally, but not on the server).
I have a site that is built in Classic ASP with ADODB Access databases. I'm moving to a new host and now getting an error for code that runs fine on current host.
ADODB.RecordSet error '800a0c93' operation is not allowed in this
context
I researched the problem and it appears that the problem is related to the way I open recordsets. by default recordsets open forward only. I'm trying to move previous in the code.
I checked and the code to open the RS is:
rsChurches.open strSQL1, adoCON, 3,3
3 = adOpenStatic.
This code should work as it runs fine on my current server. I checked the application pool. it's .net framework 2.0 classic with 32 bit applications enabled like the current server.
After looking at the server all day, I changed the cursor type to 2 and it worked.
rsChurches.cursortype = 2
rsChurches.open strSQL1, adoCON
I'm not sure why the new server didn't like type 3.
So am getting a 409 Conflict with Failed to load resource error. Happens when i click on a form submit of a generic Java web application.
On click of the button there is no application log shows up, just the following error shows up and the process ends. This log is from browser console.
What are the possibilities for such an issue? Any help/suggestion will be really helpful.Help on internet was not much helpful.
Interestingly this is very intermediate i.e. it happens for a device and the next time you won't see it, comes back from grave again in few hrs or so.
Let me start by saying that I have not received this error, but based on your problem statement, it seems you could be having trouble with a file lock on your server. If you are attempting to call a resource that is loaded in another tool like an IDE, then it is possible the file is locked and the server is raising this error.
You may only receive this error if your server is in development mode vs production mode. Production mode will cache the file and not result in a conflict.
Here is a link that partially explains the problem.
HTTP Error 409 Conflict
Hope this helps!!
I had written a mini App in asp classic this week. It worked perfectly on the test server connecting to the test data base. Then yesterday evening I moved it from the test server to the live server updating the connection strings to the live db.
I published it as an application to the default website in the default app pool. Then I tested it and it worked perfectly.
This morning however both myself and another user receive a 500 -internal Server error when we try and save changes to the database(there appears to be no issue reading from the db) yet my two other collogues have no issue at all.
Even more odd is that the same thing is happening on the test server where the code hasn't been changed in weeks. But this morning I cannot commit to the db from there either.
I have attempt to enable more detailed error tracking and logging but the property options for the server are seem unavailable when i tried to set up custom Active Server Pages (ASP) error pages off online tutorials.
The server is used by a lot of people so I was wondering is their a permission issue depending on the user that restricts writting to the database. Or something else that may have changed to allow some users to write data and others to receive the error.
Im very knew to IIS so it may be something glaringly obvious that I haven't considered.
Thanks
This article should help you:
In earlier versions of IIS, error messages from classic ASP scripts
were sent to a Web browser, by default. Because these error messages
might reveal sensitive information to malicious users, IIS 7 and above
disables this feature by default. When your classic ASP scripts
encounter an error in IIS, you receive the following error message by
default:
An error occurred on the server when processing the URL. Please contact the system administrator.
If you are the system administrator please click here to find out more about this error.
I am on IIS 7 with a Classic ASP application using Server.GetLastError() and i added this script that writes the error details to a database as a custom '500.100' error in IIS to execute this URL. So far it's been working on most situations when there is an error in the application. However, I am noticing in the IIS log that many people are getting ASP_0147 | Internal Server Error with a 500 error and no further explanation.
I am trying to catch this error showing up in the IIS Log using the method explained above, however, these errors are not being caught (written to database) using the application i made, whereas other types of errors are being caught, but the only errors that are being caught using the script/database i made, already show up with the entire error details in the IIS log.
So the question is, how can i catch the errors still happening in the IIS Log in the database using custom errors? because the method i'm using obviously isn't catching all the errors that show in the IIS Log, only the ones with an explanation being displayed in the log. Or, if I change the Error 'Feature Settings' to 'Detailed Errors' (because now its set on, Detailed only for Local Requests) will it show up in the IIS log, etc? Why am i only seeing 500 error in the IIS Log on certain things, but not on others? Thanks.
This could be an application stall.
If the server gets a lot of requests on the same time, causing the server to "get busy", it stalls some of the requests and possibly denying them. This could give a false-positive 500 error with the error-description (0x0).