I am developing an social app on iOS that have many-to-many relation, local persistency, and user interaction. I have tried using native Parse API in iOS and find it too cumbersome to do all the client-server logic. So my focus shifted to finding a syncing solution.
After some research I found AFIncrementalStore quite easy to use and it's highly integrated in CoreData. I just started to work on this and I have two questions to ask:
1) How to do the authentication process? Is it in AFRESTClient?
2) How to set up AFRESTClient to match Parse's REST API? (an example would be great!)
P.S. I also found FTASync, which seems to be another solution. Any thought on this framework?
Any general suggestion on client-server syncing solutions will be highly appreciated!
Thanks,
Lei Zhang
Back with iOS 5 Apple silently rolled out NSIncrementalStore to manage connection between APIs and persistent stores. Because I couldn't word it better myself:
NSIncrementalStore is an abstract subclass of NSPersistentStore designed to "create persistent stores which load and save data incrementally, allowing for the management of large and/or shared datasets". And while that may not sound like much, consider that nearly all of the database adapters we rely on load incrementally from large, shared data stores. What we have here is a goddamned miracle.
Source: http://nshipster.com/nsincrementalstore/
That being said, I've been working on my own NSIncrementalStore (built specifically for Parse and utilizing the Parse iOS/OS X SDK) and you're welcome to check out/use/contribute to the project at https://github.com/sbonami/PFIncrementalStore.
Take a look at this StackOverflow question and at Chris Wagner's article on raywenderlich.com.
The linked SO question has examples for how to include the authentication token with each request to Parse. So you'll just need to have the user log in first, and store their token to include it with each subsequent request.
Chris Wagner's tutorial has a sample AFHTTPClient named SDAFParseApiClient to communicate with the Parse REST API. You'd have to adapt it to be an AFRESTClient subclass, but it should give you a start.
Some other thoughts between the two solutions you're considering:
AFIncrementalStore does not allow the user to make any changes without a network connection, while FTASync keeps a full Core Data SQLite store locally and syncs changes to the server when you tell it to.
FTASync requires you to make all your synched managed objects subclasses of FTASyncParent, with extra properties for sync metadata. AFIncrementalStore keeps its metadata behind the scenes, not in your model.
FTASync appears not to be widely used and hasn't been updated in over a year; if you use it you will likely be maintaining it.
Related
I am kind of confused about when an API is needed. I have recently created a mobile app with flutter and cloud firestore as the database where i simply queried and wrote to the database when needed. Now i am learning full stack web development and I recently watched a tutorial where he built like an Express API with GET, POST, and DELETE functionality for a simple item in the database.
Coming from a background where i just directly accessed the database i am not sure why an API in this case is necessary, is it so I wouldnt have to rewrite the queries every time? This is a very simple project so he's definitely not making a 3rd party api for other developers to use. Am i misunderstanding what an API does exactly?
It was really simple, there was one collection in a MongoDB database and he was using postman to read and write to and from the database to check if it works.
API is a standard way with which your front-end (web/mobile) stores/gets information for your application. Your front-end can/should not directly access database ever. Understand the purpose of front-end which is to just display the interface and should do minimal processing. All the application logic should be at your backend (API server) which is exposed to your frontend via API (GET, POST etc) calls. So to store an item in your database, you will write data storing logic in your backend, and expose an API end-point which when triggered will perform the storing operation. That API call should be used by your front-end to trigger the storing process. In this way your logic of storing/database or any other thing is not exposed, only the API URL is. The purpose of front-end is to be exposed whereas backend/database should never be exposed and used from front-end
May be for you, an API is not necessary. But, the use-cases of an API is a lot.
For example:
You don't have to write business logic for every platform. (iOS, Android, Web, Whatever)
Your app will be lightweight since some computation would be offloaded to server.
Your app can be reverse engineered to get secret informations. (or, Your secret algorithm may be?)
What if you need to store something in filesystem that you want share with others?
Also a good read: Why we should use REST?
In your case, you are using a pre-written SDK which knows how to connect to Firestore, does caching and updates application data when needed, and provides a standard method of reading, writing and deleting data in Firestore (with associated documentation and example data from google).
Therefore, using an API (as described for the mongoDB) is not required and is undesirable.
There are some cases where you might want to have no read or write access to a firestore collection or document, and in this case, you could write a cloud function which your app calls with parameters, that receives the data that you want to write and does some sort of checking or manipulation beyond the capabilities of cloud firestore rules (although these can get pretty sophisticated). See https://firebase.google.com/docs/firestore/security/get-started
Todd (in the video contained in this link) does a few good videos on this subject.
However, this is not really working in the same was as the API you mentioned in your question.
So in the case of using Firestore, you should use the SDK and not re-invent the wheel by creating your own API.
If you want to share photos for example, you can also store them in firebase storage and then provide a URL for other devices to access them without your app being installed.
If you want to write something to firestore which is then sent to all other users then you can use listeners on each app, and the data will be sent to the apps after it arrives at Firestore.
https://firebase.google.com/docs/firestore/query-data/listen gives an overview of this.
One thing to always look at with firebase is the cost of doing anything. Cloud functions cost more than doing a read of a firestore document.
This gives an overview of pricing for different capabilities within the firebase set of capabilities.
https://firebase.google.com/pricing
Another most important factor is coupling. To add to #Dijkstra API provides a way to decouple the logic from each other, thus allowing for more application reliability, maintainability, fault-tolerance and if required scalability.
Thus there is no right or wrong here, or the comparison of API vs DB call is in itself not justified for the fact that fetching the data from Database is the ultimate aim. Even if you use a REST API or Query a database.
The means to achieve the same can differ based on specific requirements. For example, fetching water from the well.
You can always climb down the well and fetch a bucket of water if you need 1 bucket per day and you are the only user.
But if there are many users you would want to install a pull and wheel where people use it to pour fetched water into their bucket, yet again this will depend if there are 100 users per day using or more than that. As this will not work in the case of more than 100 users.
IF the case is that an entire community of say 1000 user are going to need the water you would go with a more complex solution of installing a motorized water pump to pump out the water and supply it to the user's home via a pipeline. This solution has many benefits like fast supply, easy to use, filtered water, scheduled, etc. But the cost and effort to achieve the solution is higher as well.
All in all, It comes down to the cost-vs-benefit ratio which you and only you can chart out, for different solutions vs the particular problem, as you are the best judge of scale and future user flow.
While doing that you can ask the following question about the solution to help decide :
Is the solution satisfying the primary requirement of the problem?
How much time is it going to take to build it?
For the time we spend to build a solution, is it going to working at more than 75% or more of its capacity?
If not is there a simpler solution that I can use to satisfy the problem and scale it as the requirement increases?
HTH.
Apologies if this question is too general. This is not an invitation for "opinion-based" answers. Unfortunately, at this stage of the project and with my limited knowledge in this space, I just need some guidance from more experienced people.
In a large company project, I have a web service that is based on NOSQL data models. I have little influence over the design of this service. Due to the data structure, when overseeing the development of a large and complex mobile app (for multiple platforms), I noticed that sometimes it was necessary to make calls to multiple endpoints in sequence to get the required information.
For example: there is the need to first call an endpoint sending certain parameters to get a user ID, then use that user ID to get details about the user. The system cannot deliver the user details on the first call. This leads to complex data parsing and background processes on the clients.
To simplify mobile development, we now want to build a "middleware" layer that simplifies the API for the mobile clients. The app would call the middleware as the single point of entry, the middleware would call the existing endpoints to gather the necessary data and deliver the result back to the client.
For example, the client would ask for finding a certain user and delivering certain attributes of this user (e.g. the first names of all friends of the user) with one API endpoint. The middleware would need to make many calls to the backend: search for the user, use the result (user ID) to get details and friends of the user, use the delivered friends' userIDs to gather data about the friends. Then the middleware would package the information and deliver it back to the client.
Initial recommendations from colleagues indicate that Node.JS would be a good framework for developing this type of functionality in a maintainable, scalable way.
OK, I know how to run a simple server and manage routes on a node system, but how would you organize this project, e.g. the file structure? Which components would you encapsulate. Are there any frameworks on top of Node that would help with a task like that?
I am not looking for "opinions", just for some insightful recommendations based on experience or knowledge. Feel free to down-vote this question after you have stated what you do not like about it and have asked specific questions to clarify (I will comply as soon as possible). Thanks.
how would you organize this project, e.g. the file structure?
I have described my filesystem layout in my express code structure github repository, which is also posted as a stackoverflow answer here
Which components would you encapsulate.
I think it's OK to encapsulate the interface to each backing API as a "model" or "service" type module. If you are making database queries, encapsulating those either into models or at least modules of related queries is OK.
Are there any frameworks on top of Node that would help with a task like that?
Yes, many. I prefer express as the basic web app framework with hapi being the other strong choice. There are other options both smaller (more 1-purpose libraries) and larger (closer to full-featured frameworks) like loopback or sails.js.
I am fairly new to Azure and mobile services, and all the examples and tutorials I can find for the table and API scripts are fairly simplistic.
If I have some processes that are fairly complex and rely on pulling information from many different tables and processing contingent on that data, should I be doing that somewhere other than the API scripts? I am new to node.js as well so maybe that's the problem but I was wondering if there is a more appropriate place for business logic, such as some bridge I need to add to my stack?
There are a lot of examples of how to use MSSql object which is used to query tables and Node in general available. A healthy search will reveal just about anything you need. Since you said you are new to Node.js consider using the .NET backend instead. It is based on Entity Framework and there are lots of Entity framework examples out there for you too. Finally, there are some really good examples of complex logic being used in the back ends in the sample code available: http://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/develop/mobile/ios-samples/ (pick your client OS) and here: http://azure.microsoft.com/blog/topics/mobile/ and here: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/azuremobile/
Let us know if you have specific questions!
I'd been using RestKit for the last two years, but recently I've started thinking about transition from these monolith framework as it seems to be really overkill.
Here's my pros for moving forward:
There is big need in using NSURLSession for background fetches and RestKit has only experimental branch for transition to AFNetworking 2.0. No actual dates when transition will be finished. (Main Reason)
No need for CoreData support in network library as no need for fully functional offline data storage.
Having headache with new concept of response/request descriptors as they don't support different parameters in path patterns (ex. access token parameter) and there is no way to create object request operation in one line with custom descriptor. Here I am loosing features of object manager as facade.
I. The biggest loss of RestKit for me in object mapping process.
Could you recommend standalone libraries that you use which shows themselves as flexible and stable?
II. And as I sad I need no fully functional storage but I still need some caching support in some places.
I've heard that NSURLCache has become useful in last OS release.
Did you use it and what's the strategy?
Does it return cached API responses when network connection is down?
III. Does anybody faces the same problems?
What solutions have you applied?
Maybe someone could give some piece of advice about architecture that he or she uses in multiple apps with pure AFNetworking?
I. In agreement with others who have commented, AFNetworking + Mantle is a simple and effective way to interact with a Restful API and to replace RestKit's object mapping process that you miss.
II. To answer the requirements of your caching support is highly dependent on the context. However, I have found for my recent functional requirements that caching a view model for a particular controller's screen and only caching reference data returned by APIs allows me to keep the application logic relatively simple whilst giving the user some continuity. A simple error notification for connectivity issues can be dealt with a cross-cutting manner.
III. One thought on the architecture relevant to this aspect is to ensure that the APIs the app is dependent on provides data according to the app experience. This allows your app to focus on what it is good at (a very slick user-experience) and moves logic into the API's closer to API dependencies such as data. This has a further benefit of reducing the chattiness of the app.
I curently have an application writen in php using the symfony framework. Rather than have seperate installs for customer on a hosted server, I would like to move to as SaaS model with one install for all customers posible running of google code or another cloud based service. I am not tied to PHP though i would like to have the benifits of a good framework.
So the chalenge: If all customers are using the same application we then have fin a way isolating each customers data. Customers do for eample have admin access and can manager their own users and privlages. At a simplistic leve you could just have a organisation identifier in each table take and add that to all database operations. However most application framewors use and ORM of some kind, and I have not been able to find one that will easly / seemlesly facinatate this at a leve the has minimum impact on the application code.
Has anyone looked at this, are there any good aproaches to this problem?
As Itay says, a multi-tenant system is a common requirement. A while back I was doing some research on this problem and came across a pretty good presentation on the different ways to handle this issue, and the pros and cons of each: http://aac2009.confreaks.com/06-feb-2009-14-30-writing-multi-tenant-applications-in-rails-guy-naor.html
This particular presentation is targeted to a Rails audience, but the principles are the same as with any language.
The approach you described is common, and PHP (One of the strengths) will allow you to comparatively easily go into the ORM code and modify it to your needs.
Second approach is to create a separate DB for each organization and a joint DB for shared resources.
A bit of a design challenge (but just a bit).
if you are really big, then you will even need to consider a separate DB server for each organization (I would say this is a serious overkill in 99.99999% of the cases).
This MSDN article gives you a very good overview of Data Architecture in Multi-tenancy: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa479086.aspx