I am executing 2 shell scripts from the main using source.
main.sh
#/bin/sh
a=1
b=2
c=3
gnome-terminal -x sh -c ". ./test1.sh|less" (note the source ".")
gnome-terminal -x sh -c ". ./test2.sh|less"
...
...
test1.sh
#!/bin/sh
echo "a="$a #doesn't print anything
I was able to do following 2 separately but when I combine, I am not able to access variables of main into other files
1. gnome-terminal -x sh -c "test1.sh|less" #able to execute in separate terminal
2. . ./test1.sh #able to access variables from main.sh in test1.sh
There are two problems here, the first is that you do not export the variables.
In this case, you must do an:
export a b c
after setting the variables.
The second problem is that the terminal windows will be launched reusing a pre-existing gnome-terminal session if one exists. This pre-existing session will have no idea of these environment variables. As a result you need to pass the option --disable-factory to the gnome-terminal command e.g.
gnome-terminal --disable-factory -x sh -c ". ./test1.sh|less"
and then you will see the proper value in the window.
Your variables have to be exported for them to be accessible to child processes:
export a=1
etc.
Related
I have a script where I need to start a command, then pass some additional commands as commands to that command. I tried
su
echo I should be root now:
who am I
exit
echo done.
... but it doesn't work: The su succeeds, but then the command prompt is just staring at me. If I type exit at the prompt, the echo and who am i etc start executing! And the echo done. doesn't get executed at all.
Similarly, I need for this to work over ssh:
ssh remotehost
# this should run under my account on remotehost
su
## this should run as root on remotehost
whoami
exit
## back
exit
# back
How do I solve this?
I am looking for answers which solve this in a general fashion, and which are not specific to su or ssh in particular. The intent is for this question to become a canonical for this particular pattern.
Adding to tripleee's answer:
It is important to remember that the section of the script formatted as a here-document for another shell is executed in a different shell with its own environment (and maybe even on a different machine).
If that block of your script contains parameter expansion, command substitution, and/or arithmetic expansion, then you must use the here-document facility of the shell slightly differently, depending on where you want those expansions to be performed.
1. All expansions must be performed within the scope of the parent shell.
Then the delimiter of the here document must be unquoted.
command <<DELIMITER
...
DELIMITER
Example:
#!/bin/bash
a=0
mylogin=$(whoami)
sudo sh <<END
a=1
mylogin=$(whoami)
echo a=$a
echo mylogin=$mylogin
END
echo a=$a
echo mylogin=$mylogin
Output:
a=0
mylogin=leon
a=0
mylogin=leon
2. All expansions must be performed within the scope of the child shell.
Then the delimiter of the here document must be quoted.
command <<'DELIMITER'
...
DELIMITER
Example:
#!/bin/bash
a=0
mylogin=$(whoami)
sudo sh <<'END'
a=1
mylogin=$(whoami)
echo a=$a
echo mylogin=$mylogin
END
echo a=$a
echo mylogin=$mylogin
Output:
a=1
mylogin=root
a=0
mylogin=leon
3. Some expansions must be performed in the child shell, some - in the parent.
Then the delimiter of the here document must be unquoted and you must escape those expansion expressions that must be performed in the child shell.
Example:
#!/bin/bash
a=0
mylogin=$(whoami)
sudo sh <<END
a=1
mylogin=\$(whoami)
echo a=$a
echo mylogin=\$mylogin
END
echo a=$a
echo mylogin=$mylogin
Output:
a=0
mylogin=root
a=0
mylogin=leon
A shell script is a sequence of commands. The shell will read the script file, and execute those commands one after the other.
In the usual case, there are no surprises here; but a frequent beginner error is assuming that some commands will take over from the shell, and start executing the following commands in the script file instead of the shell which is currently running this script. But that's not how it works.
Basically, scripts work exactly like interactive commands, but how exactly they work needs to be properly understood. Interactively, the shell reads a command (from standard input), runs that command (with input from standard input), and when it's done, it reads another command (from standard input).
Now, when executing a script, standard input is still the terminal (unless you used a redirection) but the commands are read from the script file, not from standard input. (The opposite would be very cumbersome indeed - any read would consume the next line of the script, cat would slurp all the rest of the script, and there would be no way to interact with it!) The script file only contains commands for the shell instance which executes it (though you can of course still use a here document etc to embed inputs as command arguments).
In other words, these "misunderstood" commands (su, ssh, sh, sudo, bash etc) when run alone (without arguments) will start an interactive shell, and in an interactive session, that's obviously fine; but when run from a script, that's very often not what you want.
All of these commands have ways to accept commands by ways other than in an interactive terminal session. Typically, each command supports a way to pass it commands as options or arguments:
su root -c 'who am i'
ssh user#remote uname -a
sh -c 'who am i; echo success'
Many of these commands will also accept commands on standard input:
printf 'uname -a; who am i; uptime' | su
printf 'uname -a; who am i; uptime' | ssh user#remote
printf 'uname -a; who am i; uptime' | sh
which also conveniently allows you to use here documents:
ssh user#remote <<'____HERE'
uname -a
who am i
uptime
____HERE
sh <<'____HERE'
uname -a
who am i
uptime
____HERE
For commands which accept a single command argument, that command can be sh or bash with multiple commands:
sudo sh -c 'uname -a; who am i; uptime'
As an aside, you generally don't need an explicit exit because the command will terminate anyway when it has executed the script (sequence of commands) you passed in for execution.
If you want a generic solution which will work for any kind of program, you can use the expect command.
Extract from the manual page:
Expect is a program that "talks" to other interactive programs according to a script. Following the script, Expect knows what can be expected from a program and what the correct response should be. An interpreted language provides branching and high-level control structures to direct the dialogue. In addition, the user can take control and interact directly when desired, afterward returning control to the script.
Here is a working example using expect:
set timeout 60
spawn sudo su -
expect "*?assword" { send "*secretpassword*\r" }
send_user "I should be root now:"
expect "#" { send "whoami\r" }
expect "#" { send "exit\r" }
send_user "Done.\n"
exit
The script can then be launched with a simple command:
$ expect -f custom.script
You can view a full example in the following page: http://www.journaldev.com/1405/expect-script-example-for-ssh-and-su-login-and-running-commands
Note: The answer proposed by #tripleee would only work if standard input could be read once at the start of the command, or if a tty had been allocated, and won't work for any interactive program.
Example of errors if you use a pipe
echo "su whoami" |ssh remotehost
--> su: must be run from a terminal
echo "sudo whoami" |ssh remotehost
--> sudo: no tty present and no askpass program specified
In SSH, you might force a TTY allocation with multiple -t parameters, but when sudo will ask for the password, it will fail.
Without the use of a program like expect any call to a function/program which might get information from stdin will make the next command fail:
ssh use#host <<'____HERE'
echo "Enter your name:"
read name
echo "ok."
____HERE
--> The `echo "ok."` string will be passed to the "read" command
I have a script which starts like this:
#!/bin/bash
echo "Running on OSTYPE: '$OSTYPE'"
DISTRO=""
CODENAME=""
SUDO=$(command -v sudo 2>/dev/null)
echo foo
When I run it as-is or with bash -x, it stops after the assignment to SUDO, I get as only output
+ DISTRO=
+ CODENAME=
++ command -v sudo
+ SUDO=
When I add -v to the bash invocation to get even more verbose output, the script runs normally and I see my "foo". I'm using bash 4.4.23 as shipped on https://git-scm.com/downloads
What is going wrong on my system and how can I debug this?
This happens because $(command ...) is a subshell.
Instead of set -x or bash -x create a file like follow inside your home folder:
.bash_env
set -x
So the set -x will be applied to any new bash instance and subinstance.
I have a script where I need to start a command, then pass some additional commands as commands to that command. I tried
su
echo I should be root now:
who am I
exit
echo done.
... but it doesn't work: The su succeeds, but then the command prompt is just staring at me. If I type exit at the prompt, the echo and who am i etc start executing! And the echo done. doesn't get executed at all.
Similarly, I need for this to work over ssh:
ssh remotehost
# this should run under my account on remotehost
su
## this should run as root on remotehost
whoami
exit
## back
exit
# back
How do I solve this?
I am looking for answers which solve this in a general fashion, and which are not specific to su or ssh in particular. The intent is for this question to become a canonical for this particular pattern.
Adding to tripleee's answer:
It is important to remember that the section of the script formatted as a here-document for another shell is executed in a different shell with its own environment (and maybe even on a different machine).
If that block of your script contains parameter expansion, command substitution, and/or arithmetic expansion, then you must use the here-document facility of the shell slightly differently, depending on where you want those expansions to be performed.
1. All expansions must be performed within the scope of the parent shell.
Then the delimiter of the here document must be unquoted.
command <<DELIMITER
...
DELIMITER
Example:
#!/bin/bash
a=0
mylogin=$(whoami)
sudo sh <<END
a=1
mylogin=$(whoami)
echo a=$a
echo mylogin=$mylogin
END
echo a=$a
echo mylogin=$mylogin
Output:
a=0
mylogin=leon
a=0
mylogin=leon
2. All expansions must be performed within the scope of the child shell.
Then the delimiter of the here document must be quoted.
command <<'DELIMITER'
...
DELIMITER
Example:
#!/bin/bash
a=0
mylogin=$(whoami)
sudo sh <<'END'
a=1
mylogin=$(whoami)
echo a=$a
echo mylogin=$mylogin
END
echo a=$a
echo mylogin=$mylogin
Output:
a=1
mylogin=root
a=0
mylogin=leon
3. Some expansions must be performed in the child shell, some - in the parent.
Then the delimiter of the here document must be unquoted and you must escape those expansion expressions that must be performed in the child shell.
Example:
#!/bin/bash
a=0
mylogin=$(whoami)
sudo sh <<END
a=1
mylogin=\$(whoami)
echo a=$a
echo mylogin=\$mylogin
END
echo a=$a
echo mylogin=$mylogin
Output:
a=0
mylogin=root
a=0
mylogin=leon
A shell script is a sequence of commands. The shell will read the script file, and execute those commands one after the other.
In the usual case, there are no surprises here; but a frequent beginner error is assuming that some commands will take over from the shell, and start executing the following commands in the script file instead of the shell which is currently running this script. But that's not how it works.
Basically, scripts work exactly like interactive commands, but how exactly they work needs to be properly understood. Interactively, the shell reads a command (from standard input), runs that command (with input from standard input), and when it's done, it reads another command (from standard input).
Now, when executing a script, standard input is still the terminal (unless you used a redirection) but the commands are read from the script file, not from standard input. (The opposite would be very cumbersome indeed - any read would consume the next line of the script, cat would slurp all the rest of the script, and there would be no way to interact with it!) The script file only contains commands for the shell instance which executes it (though you can of course still use a here document etc to embed inputs as command arguments).
In other words, these "misunderstood" commands (su, ssh, sh, sudo, bash etc) when run alone (without arguments) will start an interactive shell, and in an interactive session, that's obviously fine; but when run from a script, that's very often not what you want.
All of these commands have ways to accept commands by ways other than in an interactive terminal session. Typically, each command supports a way to pass it commands as options or arguments:
su root -c 'who am i'
ssh user#remote uname -a
sh -c 'who am i; echo success'
Many of these commands will also accept commands on standard input:
printf 'uname -a; who am i; uptime' | su
printf 'uname -a; who am i; uptime' | ssh user#remote
printf 'uname -a; who am i; uptime' | sh
which also conveniently allows you to use here documents:
ssh user#remote <<'____HERE'
uname -a
who am i
uptime
____HERE
sh <<'____HERE'
uname -a
who am i
uptime
____HERE
For commands which accept a single command argument, that command can be sh or bash with multiple commands:
sudo sh -c 'uname -a; who am i; uptime'
As an aside, you generally don't need an explicit exit because the command will terminate anyway when it has executed the script (sequence of commands) you passed in for execution.
If you want a generic solution which will work for any kind of program, you can use the expect command.
Extract from the manual page:
Expect is a program that "talks" to other interactive programs according to a script. Following the script, Expect knows what can be expected from a program and what the correct response should be. An interpreted language provides branching and high-level control structures to direct the dialogue. In addition, the user can take control and interact directly when desired, afterward returning control to the script.
Here is a working example using expect:
set timeout 60
spawn sudo su -
expect "*?assword" { send "*secretpassword*\r" }
send_user "I should be root now:"
expect "#" { send "whoami\r" }
expect "#" { send "exit\r" }
send_user "Done.\n"
exit
The script can then be launched with a simple command:
$ expect -f custom.script
You can view a full example in the following page: http://www.journaldev.com/1405/expect-script-example-for-ssh-and-su-login-and-running-commands
Note: The answer proposed by #tripleee would only work if standard input could be read once at the start of the command, or if a tty had been allocated, and won't work for any interactive program.
Example of errors if you use a pipe
echo "su whoami" |ssh remotehost
--> su: must be run from a terminal
echo "sudo whoami" |ssh remotehost
--> sudo: no tty present and no askpass program specified
In SSH, you might force a TTY allocation with multiple -t parameters, but when sudo will ask for the password, it will fail.
Without the use of a program like expect any call to a function/program which might get information from stdin will make the next command fail:
ssh use#host <<'____HERE'
echo "Enter your name:"
read name
echo "ok."
____HERE
--> The `echo "ok."` string will be passed to the "read" command
How do you run a shell script in a new terminal in Linux from a terminal like "start test.bat" in Windows, also it should be working in the console mode.
Here's a simple example to get you started:
To write a shell script, do this on your command prompt:
echo -e '#!/bin/sh\n echo "hello world"' > abc.sh
This writes:
#!/bin/sh
echo "hello world"
To a file called abc.sh
Next, you want to set it to executable by:
chmod +x abc.sh
Now, you can run it by:
./abc.sh
And you should see:
hello world
On your terminal.
To run it in a new terminal, you can do:
gnome-terminal -x ./abc.sh
or, if it's xterm:
xterm -e ./abc.sh
Here's a list of different terminal emulators.
Alternatively, you just run it in your current terminal, but background it instead by:
./abc.sh &
I came here wanting to figure out how to make a script spawn a terminal and run it self in it, so for those who want to do that I figured out this solution:
if [ ! -t 0 ]; then # script is executed outside the terminal?
# execute the script inside a terminal window with same arguments
x-terminal-emulator -e "$0" "$#"
# and abort running the rest of it
exit 0
fi
For gnome try this.
Replace ls with the command you want to run
gnome-terminal -x sh -c "ls|less"
I hope this is what you want
As of January 2020, the -e and -x option in gnome-terminal still run properly but throw out the following warnings:
For -e:
# Option “-e” is deprecated and might be removed in a later version
of gnome-terminal.
# Use “-- ” to terminate the options and put the command line to
execute after it.
For -x:
# Option “-x” is deprecated and might be removed in a later version
of gnome-terminal.
# Use “-- ” to terminate the options and put the command line to
execute after it.
Based on that information above, I confirmed that you can run the following two commands without receiving any warning messages:
gnome-terminal -- /bin/sh -c '<your command>'
gnome-terminal -- ./<your script>.sh
I hope this helps anyone else presently having this issue :)
i want to do something like:
schroot -c name -u root "export A=3 && export B=4"
but I get the error:
Failed to execute “export”: No such file or directory
In other words, I want to be able to programmatically execute shell commands inside the schroot environment. What is the right way to get this behavior?
I recommend:
schroot -c name -u root sh -c "export A=3 && export B=4"
or better:
schroot -c name -u root -- sh -c "export A=3 && export B=4"
This runs the shell with the '-c' option telling it (the shell) to read the following argument as the command (script) to be executed. The same technique works with other analogous commands: 'su', 'nohup', ...
The -- option terminates the arguments to schroot and ensures that any options on the rest of the command line are passed to and interpreted by the shell, not by schroot. This was suggested by SR_ in a comment, and the man page for schroot also suggests it should be used too (search for 'Separator'). The GNU getopt() function by default permutes arguments, which is not wanted here. The -- prevents it from permuting the arguments after the --.
schroot -c name -u root -- export A=3 && export B=4
Ensuring that /etc/schroot/schroot.conf has
run-exec-scripts=true
run-setup-scripts=true
You could try
schroot -c name -u root "/bin/bash -c 'export A=3; export B=4'"
but this is the first time i've heard of schroot. And the exports look like they're useless...even running the double-quoted stuff directly from the command line, it seems the child shell doesn't want to affect the parent's environment.