Error generating Birt report - internet-explorer-6

When I try to open birt report in IE 6 (only browser I have, since it is old production server), i got message:
Line: 85
Char: 1
Error: Object expected
Code: 0
Report opens blank and Parameters screen do not show.
I am using this version of birt:
- Viewer Version : 2.5.1
- Engine Version: 2.5.1
- JRE version: 1.6.0_18
And this is .rptdesign data that I am using:
<report xmlns="http://www.eclipse.o...irt/2005/design" version="3.2.6" id="1">
<property name="createdBy">Eclipse BIRT Designer Version 2.5.2.v20100208 Build <2.5.2.v20100210-0630></property>
This data was taken from previous reports that work.
My orignal .rptdesign data is:
<report xmlns="http://www.eclipse.o...irt/2005/design" version="3.2.23" id="1">
<property name="createdBy">Eclipse BIRT Designer Version 3.7.2.v20120213 Build <3.7.2.v20120214-1408></property>
Note that I am running Birt on Tomcat 6.0 .
I don't know if you need any more information, but if you do, please let me know.

You can run 2.5 reports on BIRT 3.7. But you cannot run 3.7 reports on BIRT 2.5. Newer versions have newer features, BIRT looks to see what version designer version was used to create the report before running it. If you try to run a report created in version 3.7 on BIRT 2.5, it just won't run it. If it is simple report, you can get around this by copy and paste; Copy the design version from the xml of the 2.5 into the 3.7. BIRT will think it was created in 2.5 and run it.
Of course if the report uses anything new from the 3.7 version that is not supported by the 2.5 software, it won't work. But if it is a simple table, it should be fine.

Related

Why does my Selenium VBA code no longer work?

I have a very simple VGA macro in Excel that worked fine for awhile and now has stopped. I now get one of the two error message below:
The code is somewhat longer, but I've taken out the irrelevant lines; even what I have below doesn't work:
Public edgebot As WebDriver
Sub EUPatentClass()
edgebot.Start "edge"
End Sub
The references are as follows:
Current version of Edge is Version 108.0.1462.54 (Official build) (64-bit)
Current version of edgedriver.exe (renamed from msedgedriver.ext) is also Version 108.0.1462.54
I've tried uninstalling and then reinstalling Selenium 2.0.9, and also repairing .NET Core Runtime 3.1.32(x64) and .NET SDK 6.0.307(x64). I'm running Windows 10, ver 22H2 (Build 19045.2364), fully patched and up to date.
Can anyone give me a suggestion as to what to try next? THANKS!!!

Excel update history

I would like to know how outdated my version of Excel is so that I can defend myself when presenting a project.
The option to update Excel by myself is not available so I can't know what is the last one available.
My current version is
Microsoft Excel 2016 MSO (16.0.4266.1001) 32-bit
I would like to know the most recent version.
I can't find it in : microsoft version history
I found that there is an update :
Microsoft Excel 2016 MSO (16.0.4400.1000) 32-bit
but it's still from 2016 so I can't trust that it's the last one
Excel 2016:
Talking about the Microsoft Excel 2016 (Built 16.0) , the most current version per 2021-08-16 for retail, according to microsoft is:
Release: 2021-08-10, Version Number: Version 2107 (Build 14228.20250)
Excel 2019 & Office 365
Difference as far I'm understand is that "Excel 2019 is the perpetual, bought-outright, stand-alone version of Excel and Excel 365 is the subscription-based version of the software." but otherwise they are almost identical.
Source: https://plumsolutions.com.au/whats-new-in-excel-2019-excel-365-and-whats-the-difference/
Excel 2019 Professional:
Release: 2021-08-10, Version Number: Version 1808 (Build 10377.20023)
Office 365:
Release: 2021-08-10, Version Number: 2107, Build: 14228.20250,
You can find the version you use by:
The "detailed version number" (i.e. 16.0.4400.1000) doesn't seem to have any update history page, but seem to be a part of the build number for all office products

After Django is updated from 1.8 to 2.0, the service cannot be started

enter image description here
Django version 1.8 is normal. Update to version 2.0 and enter python manage.py Runser pops up bug:__ init__ () missing 1 required positional argument: 'on_ After that, I added the property on to the models ForeignKey_ delete= models.CASCADE . But it didn't solve the problem
Updating on major version changes throws in a lot of incompatibilities. It is better to read those first before deciding to move ahead.
For more info, checkout Django 2.0 Release Notes for the list of breaking changes so that you may act accordingly

Clone a entire Document/Excel/Presentation on specific Version

Is There any Options to Clone a Word / Excel / Presentation Based on document version number
for Ex:
version - 4
version - 3
version - 2
version - 1
Here I need to clone Version 4 In Onlyoffice Document Integration Server
and without any mismatch of editor contents
here I uploaded the image in that 7 version are there, I need to clone a 4'th version (which means version 4,3,2,1 and I don't want 5,6,7) it's not like rollback, original document should not get change while cloning.
Please describe the case more detailed, we need more information about the whole process, i.e. are you going to just copy the file or start a new conversion process?
Could you please specify if the versioning already works in your environment.
If yes, how is it organized.

(Unexpected SQL_NO_TOTAL) error on text fields larger than 4096 bytes

I filed a bug report: https://github.com/hdbc/hdbc-odbc/issues/4
But maybe this is not the hdbc-odbc issue, so i'll ask here as well.
OS: linux 64 bit (archlinux), ghc-7.4.1, hdbc-odbc-2.3.1.0
Connecting to MS Sql server 2005.
Retrieving a text field larger than 4096 bytes.
With unixodbc 2.3.0 and freetds 0.82 works fine
With unixodbc 2.3.1 and freetds 0.91 gives an error "Unexpected SQL_NO_TOTAL"
tsql utility retrieves and shows large text field fine on freetds 0.91.
Anyone had problems with latest freetds, large text fields and MS SQL server ?
EDIT: I added correct handling of large text fields into hdbc-odbc. The patch is here:
https://github.com/vagifverdi/hdbc-odbc/commit/8134f715c18a0d60cc7b0329c7c2dbfee3e3e932
I added correct handling of large text fields into hdbc-odbc. The patch is here: https://github.com/vagifverdi/hdbc-odbc/commit/8134f715c18a0d60cc7b0329c7c2dbfee3e3e932
It is included in the latest hdbc-odbc on hackage.

Resources