I have merged few bat and xml files from one branch to another. After merging, I was able to see all my files merged properly (these files were already in the branch I was merging to).
However, when I tried committing, under "changes made" section I only saw four of my files. Two were missing. The missing files had xml extension. I am afraid to commit since I do not see all of my files in the list.
Has anone ever encounter this problem before?
Try to Check Out your repository in another directory, at previous revision from this commit. Verify if your files are there.
If not, I'm afraid that your files were never versioned. Otherwise, verify if the files have the old content before your commit.
Related
I did a merge of bunch of files in perforce from one project into another. Turns out one of the file (VC++ .rc) file didn't merge properly and can't even open this in IDE as a result. I just want to remerge this single file again and leave the rest as is. Is this possible?
I did try 'rollback' on the file in target project but haven't checked in yet. Than I tried to re-merge/integrate just this file but it doesn't really work.
Perforce has a couple of suggestions in their knowledgebase: http://kb.perforce.com/article/517
Essentially what you probably have to do is to "update" the .rc file to the revision prior to the failed merge (probably using rollback) and then re-integrate that file. If it mumbles something about already having been integrated you should be able to use the "force" flag (-f) for p4 integrate.
I have added a file (say SomeFile.cs) to a specific folder. I did not commit as I wanted to do commit at once after achieving the functionality. An svn update worked just fine on this until someone changed the folder name and changed the names of files under it.
Now the next day when I did svn checkout, resulted in tree level conflicts, so I copied my newly added files to this "new" location and did as "Resolve using theirs".
The resolve deleted all my local files and replaced with new folder and files. I could not find my local files (which were in my working copy) in my entire computer (includint recycle bin).
Now is there at least an option to retrieve the files which were added ("Add" option) to svn and NOT committed to svn using "Commit"?
Regards
AFAIK, only files committed to svn will be recoverable. But if you merge the conflict with theirs, then it would have overriden the changes locally.
Try to "Update to revision", but as your files were NOT committed it will most likely restore your directory structure in best case scenario.
Generally "Resolve using theirs" option is an equivalent of saying "I screwed up, they are right" -> whatever I have is wrong, and what they have is right -> overwrite my copy.
What you are asking for is pretty much against the workflow of SVN. Things don't get stored in the repository until they are committed, and are thus not "safe". You are supposed to commit often.
If you are trying to work but worried about other people's tree changes getting in your way, consider making a branch.
http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.7/svn.branchmerge.html
However, SVN should never overwrite files in your local working copy that have modifications. If you do an svn update, and someone has added/changed something, you will get a "conflict", which you will have to resolve manually. You resolved these conflicts manually, and accidentally overwrote you work. This is why you should commit often. Anything you commit can be recovered.
I have a bunch of files that I've changed that I don't really want to commit, but I would like to back them up locally in case I would like to use them again. (Then I'll revert them.)
TortoiseSvn working status helps to view the modified files, but I want a way to save them all to a separate directory like Backups\, preferably with their folder heirararchy still in tact.
How can I do that?
UPDATE:
Apparently branching is the way to go.
But what I did was just copied the modified files paths to the clipboard (which is an option in tortoisesvn) then to a file, and created a program to copy them to a backup folder.
You can create a branch and commit those files only in that branch.
You can commit it inside a branch, so it doesn't affect your current 'trunk' or branch.
If you had a try with bazaar , that is compatible with SVN, there is a shelf command to temporarily store a set of modification and apply back them later.
I am trying to figure out svn:ignore. I am using:
svn propedit svn:ignore file://path/myrepository/project
Within there I am adding 'files' to that and then saving. It commits the revision fine. When I now go to a machine to SVN Update it, it downloads the files directory. How come that isn't applied? With SVN, do you need to apply things by doing some sort of restart? I am using a Red Hat Linux box.
Thanks.
EDIT:
Looks like I misunderstood ignore.
svn:ignore only works for untracked files. once you have added a file to your repository it cannot be ignored again (unless removed again). Why should you ignore a file that you initially wanted to track?
svn:ignore only saves you from accidentally adding garbage (build products, backup/swap-files, log files, etc.). It will not forbid downloading of files from the repository (if I understood your last sentence)
I am working on a shared project which is put in SVN. The directory structure of the project is as follows:
ParentDir
- Child_Dir_1
+ GrandChild_Dir_1
+ GrandChild_Dir_2
- Child_Dir_2
Child_Dir_1 contains configuration files (Eclipse's .LAUNCH files), and people put all sorts of file in this folder.
So each time I update my source code (by right clicking on ParentDir and picking Update), I got a lot of configurations that I don't really need, and I have to delete them manually.
I still need to have the children of Child_Dir_1 (which are GrandChild_Dir_1 and GrandChild_Dir_2) to be updated.
I have tried to go to set the "ignore" property of the of Child_Dir_1 to exclude *.LAUNCH files, but each time I update the source code, the ones that I manually deleted are restored to Child_Dir_1.
Since you are using TortoiseSVN:
Go into Child_Dir_1, select GrandChild_Dir_1 and GrandChild_Dir_2 and right click, TortoiseSVN -> Update.
That will update only those two folders.
Ignore is so that you can "ignore" ( from commit, status etc.) untracked files, files that are not checked in.
It could be that manojlds' answer is the solution for you, but I have doubts. The problem here is that those files are really part of the project. They are kind of unavoidable, and must be in sync with the rest of working copy.
Option 1 (best): Remove all configuration files form repository, or better yet have in repository only configuration template files (with, say, $ as first character in file names). Each user could copy those template files to true configuration files and change them accordingly. Configuration files should not ever be committed. Only template files should, but updating template files will not mess with current configuration files of any user.
Option 2 (second best): Ignore those configuration files. Use your own files for your own configuration, with names that don't clash with existing. You may even add your files to SVN, but you may just as well not add them. Does not matter, as long as you don't need your configuration on another machine.
Option 3: Use ignore-on-commit group. Use those configuration files that already exist. Change them to your likings, but don't ever commit them. To ensure that you don't commit them by accident flag them as non-committable (go to commit window, select all non-committable files, right click > Move to changelist > ignore-on-commit). The problem with this is your files are not protected from other users' updates, but may actually be a good thing.
Option 4: Chop the folder out (a horrible hack). Remove Child_Dir_1 from working copy (Right click on it > Update to revision > set Working depth to Exclude). Save the folder elsewhere first, because it will disappear. After that create it again, inside it checkout all subfolders (GrandChild_Dir_1 and GrandChild_Dir_2), and copy your configuration files. Now you have complete control over folder's contents, but update and commit become more complicated.
Edit: There is option 5 in theory, but I doubt it can be implemented successfully. You can try: Use NTFS hard links. Copy the whole tree with all files as hard links to existing files, except .svn folders and their contents. Original directory is used for SVN operations update, commit, add and delete, and new directory is used for editing files. From new directory delete all the files you don't need, and insert all the files you do need that are not the part of SVN. The problem here is minor extra work when deleting files from and adding them to SVN.