I have a set of data with over 1000 entries.
I can filter these using the auto filter.
At the bottom, I then have some simple formulas, for example AVERAGE() and QUARTILE().
What I would like to achieve is that when I filter the data, the results from AVERAGE should change, so they should only take into account the visible data.
I've been searching google and here, but can't seem to find anything like this, other than using "subtotal", but that's not for the formulas I want to use.
Is this possible?
Thanks,
Use SUBTOTAL
Function_num Function_num Function
(incl hidden) (ignores hidden)
1 101 AVERAGE
2 102 COUNT
3 103 COUNTA
4 104 MAX
5 105 MIN
6 106 PRODUCT
7 107 STDEV
8 108 STDEVP
9 109 SUM
10 110 VAR
11 111 VARP
So you could use :
=SUBTOTAL(101, yourRange)
I think you should use a pivot table.
Related
I cannot find a way to do this, is it possible (with excel functions or VBS)?
For example, these would be the initial values:
Number
Value
101
234
102
324
103
345
104
325
105
437
106
443
107
806
108
476
109
538
110
546
And after taking the three highest numbers, this would be the output:
Number
Value
107
806
110
546
109
538
The data is constantly updating, so that might cause some issues.
You can use FILTER in combination with LARGE function to achieve this:
Columns A and B represent sample data. Cell D2 can contain this formula:
=FILTER($A$2:$B$9,$B$2:$B$9>=LARGE($B$2:$B$9,3))
If data is constantly updating, better to have an Excel Table (I named TB_NumVal), so the range index get automatically updated.
In cell: J2:
=SORT(FILTER(SORT(TB_NumVal,2), (ROW(TB_NumVal[Number])-1)
> ROWS(TB_NumVal[Number])-3),2,-1)
Here is the output:
Explanation
We sort the data, then since we start on row 2 (row 1 is the header) we substract 1. So
ROW(TB_NumVal[Number])-1
will provide the row number starting from one.
ROWS(TB_NumVal[Number])
is the total number of rows, in our case 10.
Using a filter condition like this:
(ROW(TB_NumVal[Number])-1) > ROWS(TB_NumVal[Number])-3)
ensures only the last three row will be selected, then finally sorted the filtered result by value in descending order to match the result of the screenshot of the question.
If I haave a table like so:
Shop
01/03
02/03
03/03
04/03
05/03
06/03
shop A
400
40
300
100
50
10
shop b
300
30
400
10
50
20
shop c
200
20
100
10
70
30
how do i get the total for shop B between 04/03 and 06/03 so 80 or shop a between 01/03 and 04/03 so 840. I tried a sumifs but that seems to only be able to select across the table not able to select a specific row.
Cheers
Try SUMPRODUCT:
=SUMPRODUCT(B2:G4*(A2:A4=L2)*(B1:G1>=J2)*(B1:G1<=K2))
In B1:G1 should be real dates.
You got an answer I'd prefer too using SUMPRODUCT(), but just for the record; you can use SUMIFS() in this case and just feed it the right row:
Formula in L2:
=SUMIFS(INDEX(B2:G4,MATCH(K2,A2:A4,0),0),B1:G1,">="&I2,B1:G1,"<="&J2)
Though a little bit more verbose, it's not that resource heavy.
Need help regarding Excel dynamically search based sum of two columns matching from two different tables.
I have got this Table of Data Entered One Time
A B C
1 Qlty Warp Weft
2 Stpl.1 150 20
3 Cotn.1 80 60
4 Stpl.2 20 20
5 Cotn.2 20 20
6 Stpl.3 20 40
in Column A2:A6, Quality can not be duplicated, its a unique Name
The Data entry and report Table is here
A B C D E F
8 Yarn Name Sent Bags Remaining Qualty Used Warp Used Weft
9 20 800 600 Stpl.1 71 200
10 150 101 30 Stpl.2 70 30
11 40 300 290 Stpl.3 100 10
12 20 400
C9:C5000 is Returning Column, Values are calculated on the base of Column A9:A5000 (Yarn Name)
Need to Find Yarn Name (eg:) "20" in B2:B6 AND/OR C2:C6, wherever it matches, index that Quality from A2:A6
Then match the returned qualities(could be more than one) to D9:D5000 and sum the mathced results from E9:F5000
I have tried so far in C12
=SUMIF($A$9:$A12,A12,$B$9:$B12)-(SUMIF($D$9:$D12,INDEX($A$2:$A$6,MATCH(A12,$B$2:$B$6,0)),$D$9:$D12)+SUMIF($D$9:$D12,INDEX($A$2:$A$6,MATCH(A12,$C$2:$C$6,0)),$D$9:$D12))
PS:- I am using Excel 2007
If I understand correctly, then following array formula can help you:
=SUM(IFERROR(INDEX($A$2:$A$6,N(IF(1,(MMULT(--($B$2:$C$6=A9),TRANSPOSE(COLUMN($B$2:$C$6)^0))>0)*(ROW($B$2:$C$6))-1)))=TRANSPOSE($D$9:$D$12),0)*TRANSPOSE($E$9:$E$12+$F$9:$F$12))
Array formula after editing is confirmed by pressing ctrl + shift + enter
Edit:
To calculate Warp and Weft columns separately use following array formula:
=SUM(IFERROR(INDEX($A$2:$A$6,N(IF(1,((A9=$B$2:$B$6)*ROW($B$2:$B$6))-1)))=TRANSPOSE($D$9:$D$12),0)*TRANSPOSE($E$9:$E$12))+SUM(IFERROR(INDEX($A$2:$A$6,N(IF(1,((A9=$C$2:$C$6)*ROW($C$2:$C$6))-1)))=TRANSPOSE($D$9:$D$12),0)*TRANSPOSE($F$9:$F$12))
I have a form, thanks to user JamTay317, That lists data depending on folder number (bold number in form). I need to copy it for all 1500 folders (about 400 pages)
Form is divided on 4 labels on a page for easier printing
form overview
Form get it's folder number (nr teczki) from list with all folders from another sheet called "lista teczek":
list of folders
For first 4 folder numbers I use formula:
A2='lista teczek'!A1
J2='lista teczek'!A2
A21='lista teczek'!A3
J21='lista teczek'!A4
When I copy whole page underneath it increments by 36 (number of rows between)
A38='lista teczek'!A37
J38='lista teczek'!A38
A57='lista teczek'!A39
J38='lista teczek'!A40
Instead of A5, A6, etc.
Is there any way to override excel's incrementation to force it to use consecutive numbers? Or at least formula which will make it easier to follow folders list?
So I would use offset() to get the correct position
=A2=OFFSET('lista teczek'!$A$1;ROW(A1)-INT(ROW(A1)/36)*36+4*INT(ROW(A1)/36)-1;0)
So this will offset from A1 in the list sheet.
Below are row numbers a resultant lookup row numbers
Note the formula I used in the offset has an extra "-1" as this is an OFFSET so to get 1 from 1 we need to offset by 0
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
37 5
38 6
39 7
40 8
73 9
74 10
75 11
76 12
109 13
110 14
111 15
112 16
145 17
146 18
147 19
----LOGIC--- (edit)
So the idea is that you work out the occurrence you are on. Int(row()/36) gives us this. For example
int(1/36)=0
Int(363/36)=10
First part gives us the offset from the start of the occurrence
3-int(3/36)*36=3
378-Int(363/36)*36=3
Second part give the total of the previous occurrence
4*int(3/36)=0
4*Int(363/36)*36=40
So you need to change the 36 to the gap between the occurrences and the 4 to the length of occurrences Not sure if that helps to explain
I've got some raw data like the one shown below and I want to search the value under, Category B, sub-category 3. This is something like a pivot table in compact display form.
I cannot simply use MATCH function since the name of the category is not displayed on each row. I reckon I could probably use an extra lookup column and add some mappings but that seems rather fiddly.
Category Sub-Category Value
A 1 431
2 543
3 13421
4 754
5 43
B 1 456
2 35
3 906
C 1 562
2 13
3 1243
4 765
5 35
6 12
You need to use INDEX/MATCH function pairs to reshape the ranges searched through with the lookups.
The standard formula in G2 is,
=INDEX(INDEX(C$2:C$999, MATCH(E2, A$2:A$999, 0)):C$999, MATCH(F2, INDEX(B$2:B$999, MATCH(E2, A$2:A$999, 0)):B$999, 0))
Fill down as necessary.