I want to use ptrace to write a piece of binary code in a running process's stack.
However, this causes segmentation fault (signal 11).
I can make sure the %eip register stores the pointer to the first instruction that I want to execute in the stack. I guess there is some mechanism that linux protects the stack data to be executable.
So, does anyone know how to disable such protection for stack. Specifically, I'm trying Fedora 15.
Thanks a lot!
After reading all replies, I tried execstack, which really makes code in stack executable. Thank you all!
This is probably due to the NX bit on modern processors. You may be able to disable this for your program using execstack.
http://advosys.ca/viewpoints/2009/07/disabling-the-nx-bit-for-specific-apps/
http://linux.die.net/man/8/execstack
As already mentioned it is due to the NX bit. But it is possible. I know for sure that gcc uses it itself for trampolines (which are a workaround to make e.g. function pointers of nested functions). I dont looked at the detailes, but I would recommend a look at the gcc code. Search in the sources for the architecture specific macro TARGET_ASM_TRAMPOLINE_TEMPLATE, there you should see how they do it.
EDIT: A quick google for that macro, gave me the hint: mprotect is used to change the permissions of the memory page. Also be carefull when you generate date and execute it - you maybe have in addition to flush the instruction cache.
Related
I've tried to understand the behavior of the function clock_gettime by looking at the source code of the linux kernel.
I'm currently using a 4.4.0-83-lowlatency but I only could get the 4.4.76 source files (but it should be close enough).
My first issue is that there is several occurrence of the function. I chose pc_clock_gettime which appears to be the closest and the only one handling CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW but if I'm wrong, please correct me.
I tracked back the execution flow of the function and came to a mysterious ravb_ptp_gettime64 and ravb_ptp_time_read which is related to the Ethernet driver.
So... If I understand correctly when I ask the system to give me the time, it ask to the Ethernet driver ?
This is the first time I looked into kernel code so I'm not used to it. If someone could give me an explanation of "how" and "why", it would be marvelous.
clock_gettime use a mechanism named vDSO (Virutal Dynamic Shared Object). It's a shared library which is mapped in the user space by the kernel.
vDSO allow the use of syscall frequently without a drawback on performances. So the kernel "puts" time informations into memory which user programm can access. In the end, it won't be a system call but only a simple function call.
I am trying to measure the performance of some library calls. My primary measurement tool is the rdtsc call. After doing some reading I realize that I need to disable preemption and interrupts in order to get the most accurate readings. Can someone help me figure out how to do these? I know that pthreads have a 'set affinity' mechanism. Is that enough to get the job done?
I also read somewhere that I can make calls into the kernel of the sort
preempt_disable()
raw_local_irq_save(...)
Is there any benefit to using one approach over the other? I tried the latter approach and got this error.
error: 'preempt_disable' was not declared in this scope
which can be fixed by including linux/preempt.h but the compiler still complains.
linux/preempt.h: No such file or directory
Obviously I have not done any kernel hacking and I could not find this file on my system anywhere. I am really hoping I wont have to install a new linux kernel. :)
Thanks for your input.
Pinning a pthread to a single CPU can be done using pthread_setaffinity_np
But what you want to achieve at the end is not so simple. I'll explain you why.
preempt.h is part of the Linux Kernel source. Its located here. You need to have kernel sources with you. Anyways, you need to write a kernel module to access it, you cannot use it from user space. Learn how to write a kernel module here. Same is the case with functions preempt_disable and other interrupt disabling kernel functions
Now the point is, pthreads are in user space and your preemption disabling function is in kernel space. How to interact?
Either you need to write a new system call of your own where you do your preemption and interrupt disabling and call it from user space. Or you need to resort to other Kernel-User Space Interfaces like procfs, sysfs, ioctl etc
But I am really skeptical as to how all these will help you to benchmark library functions. You may want to have a look at how performance is typically measured using rdtsc
I was wondering if anyone knows a way to prevent building unneeded device drivers when building the 2.6.32 kernel in Ubuntu 10.4 on VB? The reason I ask is we have to do a project for my operating systems class that involves adding some system calls to the kernel and the instructions say that after you add your call you need to rebuild the kernel(which takes like 3 freakin hours) and I know its because Ubuntu doesn't know which device drivers I need on so it builds them all so I'm wondering if there is a way to have it only build the ones I need? and if so how to go about that? or if anyone knows a way of being able to test added system calls without rebuilding the whole kernel(as this is really the issue)?
Thanks in advance
You can manually change kernel configuration with with rather friendly menus. Just type make nconfig (or menuconfig, or xconfig for gui). And remove drivers that you don't need.
Here are some links that may help you:
http://www.linuxtopia.org/online_books/linux_kernel/kernel_configuration/ch05.html
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/handbook-x86.xml?part=1&chap=7
http://kernel.xc.net/
Also, do you have a multicore processor? If so do you use advantages of it like here?
UPDATE: I've remembered a faster way. You can wrap a new syscall in module, thus avoiding recompilation of the whole kernel. Look here and there.
You can easily find everything here with the help of Google, though.
I've just spent my 2 extra hours trying to find bug in my modification of the kernel of the linux, every time when I was connecting module to the kernel it was good but when I unconnected it my mouse stopped to work, so using printk I found infinite loop, my question is does somebody know nice techniques to detect such bugs, sometimes it is difficult to find such loops, and linux becomes unpredictable, so how can I avoid infinite loops in kernel thanks in advance
There is some infrastructure in the kernel that allows you to detect some lockup conditions :
CONFIG_DETECT_SOFTLOCKUP
CONFIG_DETECT_HUNG_TASK
And the various lock checking function you can find in the "Kernel Hacking" section of the kernel config
I've always found printk useful for that, as you did.
Other options would be running your kernel in Bochs in debugging mode. And as I recall, there's a way of running the kernel in gdb. Google can help with those options.
Oh, you said "avoid" not "debug"... hmm, the best way to avoid is do not hack the kernel :^)
Seriously, when doing kernel-level programming you have to be extra careful. Add a main() to the code that stress-tests your routines in usermode before adding to the running kernel. And read over your code, especially after you've isolated the bug to a particular section. I once found an infinite loop in LynxOS's terminal driver when some ANSI art hung the operating system. Some junior programmer, apparently, had written that part, parsing the escape sequence options as text rather than numbers. The code was so bad, I got disgusted trying to locate the exact error that forced the loop, and just rewrote most of the driver. And tested it in usermode before adding to the kernel.
You could try to enable the NMI watchdog.
I am an intern who was offered the task of porting a test application from Solaris to Red Hat. The application is written in Ada. It works just fine on the Unix side. I compiled it on the linux side, but now it is giving me a seg fault. I ran the debugger to see where the fault was and got this:
Warning: In non-Ada task, selecting an Ada task.
=> runtime tasking structures have not yet been initialized.
<non-Ada task> with thread id 0b7fe46c0
process received signal "Segmentation fault" [11]
task #1 stopped in _dl_allocate_tls
at 0870b71b: mov edx, [edi] ;edx := [edi]
This seg fault happens before any calls are made or anything is initialized. I have been told that 'tasks' in ada get started before the rest of the program, and the problem could be with a task that is running.
But here is the kicker. This program just generates some code for another program to use. The OTHER program, when compiled under linux gives me the same kind of seg fault with the same kind of error message. This leads me to believe there might be some little tweak I can use to fix all of this, but I just don't have enough knowledge about Unix, Linux, and Ada to figure this one out all by myself.
This is a total shot in the dark, but you can have tasks blow up like this at startup if they are trying to allocate too much local memory on the stack. Your main program can safely use the system stack, but tasks have to have their stack allocated at startup from dynamic memory, so typcially your runtime has a default stack size for tasks. If your task tries to allocate a large array, it can easily blow past that limit. I've had it happen to me before.
There are multiple ways to fix this. One way is to move all your task-local data into package global areas. Another is to dynamically allocate it all.
If you can figure out how much memory would be enough, you have a couple more options. You can make the task a task type, and then use a
for My_Task_Type_Name'Storage_Size use Some_Huge_Number;
statement. You can also use a "pragma Storage_Size(My_Task_Type_Name)", but I think the "for" statement is preferred.
Lastly, with Gnat you can also change the default task stack size with the -d flag to gnatbind.
Off the top of my head, if the code was used on Sparc machines, and you're now runing on an x86 machine, you may be running into endian problems.
It's not much help, but it is a common gotcha when going multiplat.
Hunch: the linking step didn't go right. Perhaps the wrong run-time startup library got linked in?
(How likely to find out what the real trouble was, months after the question was asked?)