I used this tutorial http://delphi.about.com/od/kbthread/a/thread-gui.htm to create a class that asynchronously downloads a file from the internet in another thread with a TDownLoadURL. I did this because I want to download a file without blocking the UI thread so the program doesn't become unresponsive during large downloads, the progress bar can update, etc.
I am having a problem because even though I have done the download in another thread (inheriting from TThread and doing the work in the Execute method) the GUI thread seems to be blocked and does not process messages until the download is finished. Here is the code for my class: http://codepad.org/nArfOPJK (it's just 99 lines, a simple class). I am executing it by this, in the event handler for a button click:
var
frame: TTProgressFrame;
dlt: TDownloadThread;
begin
dlt := TDownloadThread.Create(True);
dlt.SetFile('C:\ohayo.zip');
dlt.SetURL('http://download.thinkbroadband.com/512MB.zip');
dlt.SetFrame(frame);
dlt.SetApp(Application);
dlt.Start;
Note: The SetApp method was for when I was manually calling app.ProcessMessages from inside the UpdateDownloadProgress method of my class TDownloadThread. This would keep the GUI from being unresponsive, but it made the progress bar behave wierdly (the moving glowing light thing of aero's progress bar moving way too fast), so I removed it. I want to fix this properly, and if I have to call ProcessMessages there's really no point in multithreading it.
Can someone help me fix this problem? Thanks.
I now have the solution for you!
Calling TDownLoadURL.Execute (your call to dl.Execute in TDownloadThread) results in the action being transferred back into the main thread which is why your UI becomes unresponsive.
Instead you should call ExecuteTarget(nil) which performs no such machinations and works as you intend: the download runs on the worker thread.
Related
I am using NSURLSession dataTaskWithURL:completionHandler. It looks like completionHandler is executed in a thread which is different than the thread(in my case, it's the main thread) which calls dataTaskWithURL. So my question is, since it is asynchronized, is it possible that the main thread exit, but the completionHandler thread is still running since the response has not come back, which is the case I am trying to avoid. If this could happen, how should I solve the problem? BTW, I am building this as a framework, not an application.Thanks.
In the first part of your question you seem un-sure that the completion handler is running on a different thread. To confirm this let's look at the NSURLSession Class Reference. If we look at the "Creating a Session" section we can see in the description for the following method the answer.
+ sessionWithConfiguration:delegate:delegateQueue:
Swift
init(configuration configuration: NSURLSessionConfiguration,
delegate delegate: NSURLSessionDelegate?,
delegateQueue queue: NSOperationQueue?)
Objective-C
+ (NSURLSession *)sessionWithConfiguration:(NSURLSessionConfiguration *)configuration
delegate:(id<NSURLSessionDelegate>)delegate
delegateQueue:(NSOperationQueue *)queue
In the parameters table for the NSOperationQueue queue parameter is the following quote.
An operation queue for scheduling the delegate calls and completion handlers. The queue need not be a serial queue. If nil, the session creates a serial operation queue for performing all delegate method calls and completion handler calls.
So we can see the default behavior is to provide a queue whether from the developer or as the default class behavior. Again we can see this in the comments for the method + sessionWithConfiguration:
Discussion
Calling this method is equivalent to calling
sessionWithConfiguration:delegate:delegateQueue: with a nil delegate
and queue.
If you would like a more information you should read Apple's Concurrency Programming Guide. This is also useful in understanding Apple's approach to threading in general.
So the completion handler from - dataTaskWithURL:completionHandler: is running on a different queue, with queues normally providing their own thread(s). This leads the main component of your question. Can the main thread exit, while the completion handler is still running?
The concise answer is no, but why?
To answer this answer this we again turn to Apple's documentation, to a document that everyone should read early in their app developer career!
The App Programming Guide
The Main Run Loop
An app’s main run loop processes all user-related events. The
UIApplication object sets up the main run loop at launch time and uses
it to process events and handle updates to view-based interfaces. As
the name suggests, the main run loop executes on the app’s main
thread. This behavior ensures that user-related events are processed
serially in the order in which they were received.
All of the user interact happens on the main thread - no main thread, no main run loop, no app! So the possible condition you question mentions should never exist!
Apple seems more concerned with you doing background work on the main thread. Checkout the section "Move Work off the Main Thread"...
Be sure to limit the type of work you do on the main thread of your
app. The main thread is where your app handles touch events and other
user input. To ensure that your app is always responsive to the user,
you should never use the main thread to perform long-running or
potentially unbounded tasks, such as tasks that access the network.
Instead, you should always move those tasks onto background threads.
The preferred way to do so is to use Grand Central Dispatch (GCD) or
NSOperation objects to perform tasks asynchronously.
I know this answer is long winded, but I felt the need to offer insight and detail in answering your question - "the why" is just as important and it was good review :)
NSURLSessionTasks always run in background by default that's why we have completion handler which can be used when we get response from Web service.
If you don't get any response explore your request URL and whether HTTPHeaderFields are set properly.
Paste your code so that we can help it
I just asked the same question. Then figured out the answer. The thread of the completion handler is setup in the init of the NSURLSession.
From the documentation:
init(configuration configuration: NSURLSessionConfiguration,
delegate delegate: NSURLSessionDelegate?,
delegateQueue queue: NSOperationQueue?)`
queue - A queue for scheduling the delegate calls and completion handlers. If nil, the session creates a serial operation queue for performing all delegate method calls and completion handler calls.*
My code that sets up for completion on main thread:
var session = NSURLSession(configuration: configuration, delegate:nil, delegateQueue:NSOperationQueue.mainQueue())
(Shown in Swift, Objective-C the same) Maybe post more code if this does not solve.
I am trying to use MFC to create a tool. This tool main job is to sort data. Well, I found that when the tool is sorting, since there is only main thread; therefore, while it is doing sorting work, no dialog boxes can be moved or clicked. Hence, I created another thread to do sorting work and works fine.
But there is another problem after I used a thread. I don't how to make main thread to wait for the sorting thread. I want to do something after sorting thread is done, but right now, main thread just moves onto the next procedures without waiting for sorting thread to finish its work.
Here is snippet
AfxBeginThread(processfiles, tVals) // A thread do its work.
// below I want to do something with the result I got from the thread above.
//But main thread just do its work separately without waiting for the thread to finish its work.
.
please help thanks!!
So write code to do that. Pop up a dialog box. Indicate that the sorting is taking place. Do whatever you want. Have the other thread send your thread a signal when it's done, say by sending you a message with PostMessage.
At the moment, I am using WaitForSingleObject to wait for a sub-task thread to complete. Unfortunately, this causes my GUI to lock up. What I would like to do instead, is set a handler (in the GUI thread) that will be called after the sub-task thread is complete. Is there another function for this?
What you can do is to let the last thing that your thread does be posting a custom message to your window. Then handle that as a regular message using MFC's message map. If you cannot change the thread code, you can create a new thread that waits for your thread and then sends the message.
As you already noticed, it is not a good idea to lock up the GUI thread...
Edit: Posting the message is done using the PostMessage function as pointed out by Hans in the comments.
Could also have a look at MsgWaitForMultipleObjects (or MsgWaitForMultipleObjectsEx).
These allow a thread to wait for event handles and service windows messages (examine the return value to see what causes the call to return). Examples of usage should be available via a goodle search.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms684245(VS.85).aspx
If I am wrong then please correct me as I am new in this. I have one thread which display image captured from webcam on a windows created using CreateWindowEx() function. Now when i execute my program I can see that my paint code (in WindowProc()) in never reached (called InvalidateRect() from child thread to redraw), checked using breakpoint.
Actually frame capture and display is being done in thread and I think because its in child thread and Window is in Main thread that is why its not able to call paint event.
Can you help me on this
Calling InvalidateRect() from a child thread should make your window redraw. However WM_PAINT is a low priority message, so it is possible that the window doesn't get redrawn if there is too much other activity. Have you tried putting a Sleep() into you processing thread to give the painting a chance to get done?
Error Log says:
bool _WebTryThreadLock(bool), 0x3c689f0: Tried to obtain the web lock from a thread other than the main thread or the web thread. This may be a result of calling to UIKit from a secondary thread. Crashing now...
App structure:
worker threads are detached from the MainThread as new data is needed via user interaction, each worker thread feeds data into its own slot in an array. The problem arises only when I use the NavigationController to go "back" to the previous view WHILE a thread is still gathering data. I've tried to send a [NSThread exit] to each thread upon viewWillDisappear thats not going to work...
Any suggestions on thread clean-up upon poppin' the view controller?
So apparently i needed to build in checks to the runloop as well as the didRecieveData loop to watch for a global variable to indicate if the view has disappeared. This in turn needs to toggle the global var, causing all open threads to cancel the connection as well as exit the thread.